William: Statistics About The Baby Name William
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
2023 | 10 | 10,598 | 0.5788% | * | * | * |
2022 | 6 | 11,282 | 0.6054% | * | * | * |
2021 | 6 | 12,088 | 0.6497% | * | * | * |
2020 | 5 | 12,613 | 0.6840% | * | * | * |
2019 | 4 | 13,542 | 0.7095% | * | * | * |
2018 | 3 | 14,516 | 0.7526% | * | * | * |
2017 | 3 | 14,904 | 0.7591% | * | * | * |
2016 | 3 | 15,739 | 0.7800% | * | * | * |
2015 | 5 | 15,809 | 0.7800% | * | * | * |
2014 | 5 | 16,687 | 0.8221% | * | * | * |
2013 | 5 | 16,495 | 0.8246% | * | * | * |
2012 | 5 | 16,726 | 0.8323% | * | * | * |
2011 | 3 | 17,151 | 0.8522% | * | * | * |
2010 | 5 | 16,870 | 0.8295% | * | * | * |
2009 | 5 | 17,696 | 0.8443% | * | * | * |
2008 | 8 | 18,149 | 0.8438% | * | * | * |
2007 | 8 | 18,595 | 0.8529% | * | * | * |
2006 | 10 | 18,645 | 0.8649% | * | * | * |
2005 | 11 | 18,695 | 0.8957% | * | * | * |
2004 | 8 | 19,890 | 0.9564% | * | * | * |
2003 | 11 | 19,866 | 0.9514% | * | * | * |
2002 | 11 | 20,050 | 0.9745% | * | * | * |
2001 | 10 | 20,041 | 0.9724% | * | * | * |
2000 | 11 | 20,603 | 0.9895% | * | * | * |
1999 | 14 | 20,667 | 1.0160% | * | * | * |
1998 | 14 | 20,799 | 1.0278% | * | * | * |
1997 | 19 | 19,967 | 1.0012% | * | * | * |
1996 | 18 | 20,518 | 1.0255% | * | * | * |
1995 | 20 | 20,138 | 1.0026% | * | * | * |
1994 | 19 | 21,477 | 1.0553% | * | * | * |
1993 | 18 | 22,181 | 1.0755% | * | * | * |
1992 | 20 | 23,047 | 1.0997% | * | * | * |
1991 | 19 | 23,847 | 1.1265% | * | * | * |
1990 | 16 | 24,856 | 1.1569% | * | * | * |
1989 | 15 | 24,676 | 1.1788% | * | * | * |
1988 | 16 | 24,065 | 1.2051% | 995 | 166 | 0.0087% |
1987 | 15 | 24,171 | 1.2416% | 960 | 167 | 0.0089% |
1986 | 15 | 24,289 | 1.2667% | 955 | 165 | 0.0090% |
1985 | 16 | 24,594 | 1.2805% | 877 | 183 | 0.0099% |
1984 | 16 | 24,851 | 1.3271% | 931 | 159 | 0.0088% |
1983 | 16 | 25,344 | 1.3628% | 825 | 186 | 0.0104% |
1982 | 15 | 25,565 | 1.3578% | 867 | 178 | 0.0098% |
1981 | 15 | 24,760 | 1.3325% | 888 | 171 | 0.0096% |
1980 | 14 | 25,602 | 1.3837% | 770 | 214 | 0.0120% |
1979 | 13 | 24,661 | 1.3792% | 822 | 191 | 0.0111% |
1978 | 13 | 24,125 | 1.4151% | 810 | 185 | 0.0113% |
1977 | 12 | 24,740 | 1.4501% | 796 | 189 | 0.0115% |
1976 | 11 | 24,417 | 1.4978% | 730 | 202 | 0.0129% |
1975 | 10 | 25,527 | 1.5760% | 845 | 159 | 0.0102% |
1974 | 10 | 26,954 | 1.6558% | 797 | 170 | 0.0109% |
1973 | 9 | 28,001 | 1.7377% | 816 | 161 | 0.0104% |
1972 | 9 | 30,483 | 1.8230% | 726 | 195 | 0.0121% |
1971 | 7 | 35,384 | 1.9502% | 741 | 202 | 0.0115% |
1970 | 7 | 38,846 | 2.0424% | 729 | 204 | 0.0111% |
1969 | 6 | 37,595 | 2.0562% | 715 | 198 | 0.0112% |
1968 | 6 | 36,952 | 2.0825% | 710 | 189 | 0.0111% |
1967 | 6 | 37,603 | 2.1147% | 719 | 186 | 0.0108% |
1966 | 6 | 38,249 | 2.1061% | 735 | 180 | 0.0103% |
1965 | 6 | 40,144 | 2.1194% | 794 | 155 | 0.0085% |
1964 | 7 | 44,203 | 2.1824% | 842 | 153 | 0.0078% |
1963 | 7 | 44,474 | 2.1547% | 757 | 185 | 0.0093% |
1962 | 7 | 44,834 | 2.1346% | 784 | 176 | 0.0087% |
1961 | 7 | 47,955 | 2.2281% | 729 | 204 | 0.0098% |
1960 | 7 | 49,298 | 2.2772% | 808 | 165 | 0.0079% |
1959 | 7 | 51,377 | 2.3733% | 818 | 158 | 0.0076% |
1958 | 6 | 54,139 | 2.5180% | 793 | 161 | 0.0078% |
1957 | 6 | 56,746 | 2.5968% | 775 | 168 | 0.0080% |
1956 | 6 | 58,908 | 2.7501% | 798 | 156 | 0.0076% |
1955 | 6 | 59,821 | 2.8674% | 922 | 114 | 0.0057% |
1954 | 6 | 61,410 | 2.9721% | 824 | 131 | 0.0066% |
1953 | 6 | 61,674 | 3.0886% | 803 | 132 | 0.0068% |
1952 | 6 | 62,955 | 3.1908% | 729 | 149 | 0.0078% |
1951 | 6 | 62,509 | 3.2840% | 875 | 106 | 0.0058% |
1950 | 6 | 60,686 | 3.3377% | 772 | 127 | 0.0072% |
1949 | 4 | 61,278 | 3.4111% | 764 | 128 | 0.0073% |
1948 | 4 | 61,799 | 3.4762% | 668 | 157 | 0.0090% |
1947 | 4 | 66,779 | 3.6065% | 679 | 153 | 0.0084% |
1946 | 4 | 59,805 | 3.6380% | 631 | 157 | 0.0098% |
1945 | 4 | 50,140 | 3.6608% | 611 | 141 | 0.0105% |
1944 | 4 | 52,136 | 3.7659% | 624 | 139 | 0.0102% |
1943 | 4 | 55,682 | 3.8468% | 579 | 170 | 0.0119% |
1942 | 4 | 54,868 | 3.8947% | 565 | 171 | 0.0123% |
1941 | 4 | 47,722 | 3.8099% | 605 | 136 | 0.0109% |
1940 | 4 | 44,787 | 3.7765% | 563 | 152 | 0.0129% |
1939 | 4 | 42,106 | 3.7140% | 539 | 152 | 0.0134% |
1938 | 4 | 42,397 | 3.7334% | 590 | 138 | 0.0121% |
1937 | 4 | 40,663 | 3.7228% | 515 | 164 | 0.0149% |
1936 | 4 | 39,359 | 3.7023% | 524 | 153 | 0.0142% |
1935 | 4 | 40,146 | 3.7587% | 494 | 164 | 0.0151% |
1934 | 4 | 40,150 | 3.7860% | 489 | 174 | 0.0161% |
1933 | 4 | 38,976 | 3.8283% | 470 | 196 | 0.0188% |
1932 | 4 | 42,068 | 3.9215% | 429 | 234 | 0.0212% |
1931 | 4 | 43,163 | 4.0452% | 420 | 237 | 0.0215% |
1930 | 4 | 47,135 | 4.1816% | 399 | 288 | 0.0247% |
1929 | 4 | 47,720 | 4.3162% | 365 | 335 | 0.0290% |
1928 | 4 | 49,039 | 4.3040% | 367 | 350 | 0.0293% |
1927 | 4 | 51,399 | 4.4314% | 381 | 322 | 0.0261% |
1926 | 4 | 51,830 | 4.5299% | 396 | 300 | 0.0244% |
1925 | 3 | 53,228 | 4.6285% | 405 | 290 | 0.0230% |
1924 | 3 | 53,493 | 4.5784% | 444 | 249 | 0.0192% |
1923 | 3 | 52,151 | 4.6053% | 462 | 224 | 0.0179% |
1922 | 3 | 51,162 | 4.5449% | 501 | 193 | 0.0155% |
1921 | 3 | 51,834 | 4.5579% | 511 | 192 | 0.0150% |
1920 | 2 | 50,167 | 4.5577% | 476 | 205 | 0.0165% |
1919 | 2 | 43,997 | 4.3310% | 516 | 175 | 0.0149% |
1918 | 2 | 45,349 | 4.3183% | 535 | 172 | 0.0143% |
1917 | 2 | 42,408 | 4.4206% | 519 | 166 | 0.0148% |
1916 | 2 | 40,445 | 4.3797% | 574 | 137 | 0.0126% |
1915 | 2 | 38,582 | 4.3776% | 566 | 130 | 0.0127% |
1914 | 2 | 29,743 | 4.3549% | 575 | 97 | 0.0122% |
1913 | 2 | 23,532 | 4.3929% | 529 | 93 | 0.0142% |
1912 | 2 | 19,613 | 4.3489% | 551 | 79 | 0.0135% |
1911 | 2 | 10,586 | 4.3951% | 608 | 50 | 0.0114% |
1910 | 3 | 8,834 | 4.2435% | 704 | 37 | 0.0088% |
1909 | 2 | 7,906 | 4.4766% | 682 | 35 | 0.0095% |
1908 | 2 | 7,528 | 4.5277% | 557 | 46 | 0.0130% |
1907 | 2 | 6,911 | 4.3599% | 708 | 29 | 0.0086% |
1906 | 2 | 6,568 | 4.5595% | 705 | 28 | 0.0089% |
1905 | 2 | 6,496 | 4.5344% | 682 | 28 | 0.0090% |
1904 | 2 | 6,418 | 4.6336% | 709 | 25 | 0.0085% |
1903 | 2 | 6,313 | 4.8803% | 557 | 35 | 0.0126% |
1902 | 2 | 6,615 | 4.9819% | 686 | 25 | 0.0089% |
1901 | 2 | 5,993 | 5.1827% | 545 | 32 | 0.0126% |
1900 | 2 | 8,596 | 5.2883% | 514 | 44 | 0.0138% |
1899 | 2 | 6,086 | 5.2821% | 663 | 23 | 0.0093% |
1898 | 2 | 7,400 | 5.5997% | 485 | 41 | 0.0150% |
1897 | 2 | 7,200 | 5.9025% | 529 | 32 | 0.0129% |
1896 | 2 | 7,750 | 6.0027% | 439 | 44 | 0.0175% |
1895 | 2 | 7,279 | 5.7462% | 464 | 40 | 0.0162% |
1894 | 2 | 7,275 | 5.8236% | 493 | 34 | 0.0144% |
1893 | 2 | 7,223 | 5.9658% | 486 | 32 | 0.0142% |
1892 | 2 | 7,783 | 5.9196% | 405 | 44 | 0.0196% |
1891 | 2 | 6,763 | 6.1887% | 354 | 50 | 0.0254% |
1890 | 2 | 7,494 | 6.2597% | 435 | 35 | 0.0174% |
1889 | 2 | 7,773 | 6.5285% | 357 | 46 | 0.0243% |
1888 | 2 | 8,704 | 6.6994% | 371 | 42 | 0.0222% |
1887 | 2 | 7,471 | 6.8337% | 323 | 44 | 0.0283% |
1886 | 2 | 8,252 | 6.9313% | 364 | 35 | 0.0228% |
1885 | 2 | 8,044 | 6.9374% | 353 | 33 | 0.0232% |
1884 | 2 | 8,896 | 7.2473% | 340 | 34 | 0.0247% |
1883 | 2 | 8,387 | 7.4554% | 281 | 40 | 0.0333% |
1882 | 2 | 9,298 | 7.6181% | 322 | 31 | 0.0268% |
1881 | 2 | 8,525 | 7.8709% | 289 | 30 | 0.0303% |
1880 | 2 | 9,535 | 8.0517% | 288 | 30 | 0.0307% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |