Virgil: Statistics About The Baby Name Virgil
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1991 | 866 | 148 | 0.0070% | * | * | * |
1990 | 810 | 158 | 0.0074% | * | * | * |
1989 | 823 | 146 | 0.0070% | * | * | * |
1988 | 797 | 142 | 0.0071% | * | * | * |
1987 | 773 | 142 | 0.0073% | * | * | * |
1986 | 670 | 179 | 0.0093% | * | * | * |
1985 | 731 | 146 | 0.0076% | * | * | * |
1984 | 641 | 180 | 0.0096% | * | * | * |
1983 | 676 | 160 | 0.0086% | * | * | * |
1982 | 569 | 227 | 0.0121% | * | * | * |
1981 | 575 | 221 | 0.0119% | * | * | * |
1980 | 618 | 201 | 0.0109% | * | * | * |
1979 | 557 | 238 | 0.0133% | * | * | * |
1978 | 556 | 226 | 0.0133% | * | * | * |
1977 | 525 | 252 | 0.0148% | * | * | * |
1976 | 488 | 265 | 0.0163% | * | * | * |
1975 | 451 | 311 | 0.0192% | * | * | * |
1974 | 448 | 313 | 0.0192% | * | * | * |
1973 | 421 | 345 | 0.0214% | * | * | * |
1972 | 415 | 365 | 0.0218% | * | * | * |
1971 | 392 | 422 | 0.0233% | * | * | * |
1970 | 396 | 407 | 0.0214% | * | * | * |
1969 | 407 | 385 | 0.0211% | * | * | * |
1968 | 371 | 439 | 0.0247% | * | * | * |
1967 | 356 | 444 | 0.0250% | * | * | * |
1966 | 348 | 458 | 0.0252% | * | * | * |
1965 | 338 | 503 | 0.0266% | * | * | * |
1964 | 333 | 548 | 0.0271% | * | * | * |
1963 | 332 | 562 | 0.0272% | * | * | * |
1962 | 334 | 554 | 0.0264% | * | * | * |
1961 | 315 | 623 | 0.0289% | * | * | * |
1960 | 296 | 685 | 0.0316% | * | * | * |
1959 | 303 | 653 | 0.0302% | * | * | * |
1958 | 288 | 705 | 0.0328% | * | * | * |
1957 | 292 | 658 | 0.0301% | * | * | * |
1956 | 276 | 711 | 0.0332% | * | * | * |
1955 | 272 | 690 | 0.0331% | * | * | * |
1954 | 260 | 743 | 0.0360% | * | * | * |
1953 | 249 | 754 | 0.0378% | * | * | * |
1952 | 238 | 786 | 0.0398% | * | * | * |
1951 | 242 | 783 | 0.0411% | * | * | * |
1950 | 234 | 785 | 0.0432% | * | * | * |
1949 | 228 | 788 | 0.0439% | * | * | * |
1948 | 229 | 795 | 0.0447% | * | * | * |
1947 | 219 | 848 | 0.0458% | * | * | * |
1946 | 197 | 881 | 0.0536% | * | * | * |
1945 | 184 | 843 | 0.0615% | * | * | * |
1944 | 177 | 920 | 0.0665% | * | * | * |
1943 | 175 | 991 | 0.0685% | * | * | * |
1942 | 169 | 993 | 0.0705% | * | * | * |
1941 | 170 | 919 | 0.0734% | * | * | * |
1940 | 166 | 941 | 0.0793% | * | * | * |
1939 | 164 | 937 | 0.0826% | * | * | * |
1938 | 152 | 1,065 | 0.0938% | * | * | * |
1937 | 157 | 965 | 0.0883% | * | * | * |
1936 | 149 | 1,036 | 0.0974% | * | * | * |
1935 | 140 | 1,100 | 0.1030% | * | * | * |
1934 | 141 | 1,120 | 0.1056% | * | * | * |
1933 | 138 | 1,136 | 0.1116% | * | * | * |
1932 | 139 | 1,228 | 0.1145% | * | * | * |
1931 | 121 | 1,383 | 0.1296% | * | * | * |
1930 | 128 | 1,361 | 0.1207% | * | * | * |
1929 | 129 | 1,328 | 0.1201% | * | * | * |
1928 | 125 | 1,407 | 0.1235% | * | * | * |
1927 | 122 | 1,497 | 0.1291% | * | * | * |
1926 | 118 | 1,578 | 0.1379% | * | * | * |
1925 | 120 | 1,488 | 0.1294% | * | * | * |
1924 | 111 | 1,633 | 0.1398% | * | * | * |
1923 | 100 | 1,717 | 0.1516% | * | * | * |
1922 | 99 | 1,788 | 0.1588% | * | * | * |
1921 | 98 | 1,828 | 0.1607% | * | * | * |
1920 | 102 | 1,707 | 0.1551% | 979 | 57 | 0.0046% |
1919 | 103 | 1,580 | 0.1555% | * | * | * |
1918 | 99 | 1,711 | 0.1629% | * | * | * |
1917 | 103 | 1,519 | 0.1583% | * | * | * |
1916 | 104 | 1,498 | 0.1622% | * | * | * |
1915 | 108 | 1,375 | 0.1560% | * | * | * |
1914 | 107 | 1,046 | 0.1532% | * | * | * |
1913 | 107 | 818 | 0.1527% | * | * | * |
1912 | 111 | 682 | 0.1512% | * | * | * |
1911 | 107 | 355 | 0.1474% | * | * | * |
1910 | 112 | 279 | 0.1340% | * | * | * |
1909 | 110 | 250 | 0.1416% | * | * | * |
1908 | 100 | 258 | 0.1552% | * | * | * |
1907 | 93 | 277 | 0.1748% | * | * | * |
1906 | 103 | 207 | 0.1437% | * | * | * |
1905 | 97 | 226 | 0.1578% | * | * | * |
1904 | 100 | 211 | 0.1523% | * | * | * |
1903 | 112 | 173 | 0.1337% | 931 | 15 | 0.0054% |
1902 | 119 | 163 | 0.1228% | * | * | * |
1901 | 110 | 158 | 0.1366% | * | * | * |
1900 | 111 | 212 | 0.1304% | 969 | 16 | 0.0050% |
1899 | 111 | 154 | 0.1337% | 981 | 12 | 0.0048% |
1898 | 120 | 155 | 0.1173% | 917 | 15 | 0.0055% |
1897 | 110 | 159 | 0.1303% | * | * | * |
1896 | 126 | 138 | 0.1069% | 997 | 12 | 0.0048% |
1895 | 116 | 146 | 0.1153% | * | * | * |
1894 | 130 | 125 | 0.1001% | * | * | * |
1893 | 127 | 119 | 0.0983% | * | * | * |
1892 | 129 | 130 | 0.0989% | * | * | * |
1891 | 114 | 123 | 0.1126% | 941 | 10 | 0.0051% |
1890 | 142 | 100 | 0.0835% | * | * | * |
1889 | 154 | 93 | 0.0781% | * | * | * |
1888 | 137 | 112 | 0.0862% | * | * | * |
1887 | 165 | 77 | 0.0704% | * | * | * |
1886 | 175 | 79 | 0.0664% | * | * | * |
1885 | 165 | 82 | 0.0707% | * | * | * |
1884 | 160 | 88 | 0.0717% | * | * | * |
1883 | 176 | 70 | 0.0622% | * | * | * |
1882 | 171 | 80 | 0.0655% | * | * | * |
1881 | 182 | 65 | 0.0600% | * | * | * |
1880 | 164 | 81 | 0.0684% | * | * | * |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |