Theo: Statistics About The Baby Name Theo
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
2023 | 78 | 4,122 | 0.2251% | * | * | * |
2022 | 99 | 3,614 | 0.1939% | * | * | * |
2021 | 142 | 2,688 | 0.1445% | * | * | * |
2020 | 172 | 2,221 | 0.1204% | * | * | * |
2019 | 195 | 2,002 | 0.1049% | * | * | * |
2018 | 243 | 1,541 | 0.0799% | * | * | * |
2017 | 289 | 1,223 | 0.0623% | * | * | * |
2016 | 354 | 947 | 0.0469% | * | * | * |
2015 | 408 | 758 | 0.0374% | * | * | * |
2014 | 509 | 542 | 0.0267% | * | * | * |
2013 | 666 | 358 | 0.0179% | * | * | * |
2012 | 794 | 282 | 0.0140% | * | * | * |
2011 | 867 | 240 | 0.0119% | * | * | * |
2010 | 915 | 220 | 0.0108% | * | * | * |
1945 | 946 | 47 | 0.0034% | * | * | * |
1944 | 984 | 44 | 0.0032% | * | * | * |
1943 | 852 | 61 | 0.0042% | * | * | * |
1939 | 760 | 64 | 0.0056% | * | * | * |
1938 | 769 | 64 | 0.0056% | * | * | * |
1936 | 696 | 73 | 0.0069% | * | * | * |
1935 | 733 | 70 | 0.0066% | * | * | * |
1934 | 845 | 56 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
1933 | 781 | 62 | 0.0061% | * | * | * |
1932 | 715 | 76 | 0.0071% | * | * | * |
1931 | 646 | 85 | 0.0080% | * | * | * |
1930 | 661 | 89 | 0.0079% | * | * | * |
1929 | 731 | 74 | 0.0067% | 838 | 72 | 0.0062% |
1928 | 654 | 92 | 0.0081% | 962 | 61 | 0.0051% |
1927 | 602 | 108 | 0.0093% | * | * | * |
1926 | 614 | 105 | 0.0092% | 764 | 90 | 0.0073% |
1925 | 644 | 98 | 0.0085% | 733 | 102 | 0.0081% |
1924 | 659 | 97 | 0.0083% | 707 | 111 | 0.0086% |
1923 | 670 | 92 | 0.0081% | 849 | 75 | 0.0060% |
1922 | 624 | 108 | 0.0096% | 722 | 102 | 0.0082% |
1921 | 617 | 107 | 0.0094% | 748 | 96 | 0.0075% |
1920 | 638 | 98 | 0.0089% | 730 | 98 | 0.0079% |
1919 | 642 | 91 | 0.0090% | 673 | 109 | 0.0093% |
1918 | 665 | 87 | 0.0083% | 704 | 105 | 0.0087% |
1917 | 637 | 88 | 0.0092% | 741 | 91 | 0.0081% |
1916 | 592 | 97 | 0.0105% | 695 | 98 | 0.0090% |
1915 | 604 | 91 | 0.0103% | 668 | 98 | 0.0096% |
1914 | 553 | 81 | 0.0119% | 722 | 64 | 0.0081% |
1913 | 551 | 62 | 0.0116% | 746 | 50 | 0.0077% |
1912 | 572 | 50 | 0.0111% | 694 | 53 | 0.0091% |
1911 | 545 | 31 | 0.0129% | 730 | 36 | 0.0082% |
1910 | 471 | 35 | 0.0168% | 809 | 29 | 0.0069% |
1909 | 572 | 22 | 0.0125% | 585 | 44 | 0.0120% |
1908 | 412 | 34 | 0.0204% | 807 | 24 | 0.0068% |
1907 | 435 | 29 | 0.0183% | 679 | 32 | 0.0095% |
1906 | 586 | 17 | 0.0118% | 714 | 27 | 0.0086% |
1905 | 475 | 23 | 0.0161% | 630 | 32 | 0.0103% |
1904 | 407 | 27 | 0.0195% | 627 | 31 | 0.0106% |
1903 | 523 | 18 | 0.0139% | 627 | 29 | 0.0104% |
1902 | 425 | 24 | 0.0181% | 557 | 35 | 0.0125% |
1901 | 464 | 18 | 0.0156% | 765 | 19 | 0.0075% |
1900 | 697 | 14 | 0.0086% | 798 | 22 | 0.0069% |
1899 | 710 | 10 | 0.0087% | 830 | 16 | 0.0065% |
1898 | 538 | 16 | 0.0121% | 665 | 25 | 0.0091% |
1897 | 677 | 11 | 0.0090% | 582 | 28 | 0.0113% |
1896 | 670 | 12 | 0.0093% | 650 | 24 | 0.0095% |
1895 | 578 | 14 | 0.0111% | 620 | 25 | 0.0101% |
1894 | 624 | 12 | 0.0096% | 738 | 17 | 0.0072% |
1893 | 646 | 11 | 0.0091% | 686 | 19 | 0.0084% |
1892 | 789 | 9 | 0.0068% | 563 | 25 | 0.0111% |
1891 | 589 | 11 | 0.0101% | 585 | 21 | 0.0107% |
1890 | 599 | 12 | 0.0100% | 820 | 12 | 0.0060% |
1889 | 783 | 8 | 0.0067% | 616 | 18 | 0.0095% |
1888 | 750 | 9 | 0.0069% | 631 | 17 | 0.0090% |
1887 | 627 | 10 | 0.0091% | 522 | 19 | 0.0122% |
1886 | 752 | 8 | 0.0067% | 603 | 15 | 0.0098% |
1885 | 760 | 8 | 0.0069% | 694 | 11 | 0.0077% |
1884 | 839 | 7 | 0.0057% | 540 | 16 | 0.0116% |
1883 | 493 | 14 | 0.0124% | 813 | 7 | 0.0058% |
1882 | 573 | 12 | 0.0098% | 631 | 10 | 0.0086% |
1881 | 697 | 8 | 0.0074% | 670 | 8 | 0.0081% |
1880 | 680 | 9 | 0.0076% | 730 | 7 | 0.0072% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |