
Thelma: Statistics About The Baby Name Thelma
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
| 1982 | * | * | * | 975 | 152 | 0.0084% |
| 1981 | * | * | * | 967 | 152 | 0.0085% |
| 1980 | * | * | * | 998 | 148 | 0.0083% |
| 1979 | * | * | * | 909 | 164 | 0.0095% |
| 1978 | * | * | * | 857 | 172 | 0.0105% |
| 1977 | * | * | * | 781 | 194 | 0.0118% |
| 1976 | * | * | * | 751 | 193 | 0.0123% |
| 1975 | * | * | * | 737 | 198 | 0.0127% |
| 1974 | * | * | * | 643 | 238 | 0.0152% |
| 1973 | * | * | * | 683 | 219 | 0.0141% |
| 1972 | * | * | * | 667 | 226 | 0.0140% |
| 1971 | * | * | * | 609 | 281 | 0.0161% |
| 1970 | * | * | * | 623 | 273 | 0.0149% |
| 1969 | * | * | * | 553 | 320 | 0.0182% |
| 1968 | * | * | * | 481 | 400 | 0.0234% |
| 1967 | * | * | * | 482 | 387 | 0.0225% |
| 1966 | * | * | * | 429 | 474 | 0.0270% |
| 1965 | * | * | * | 383 | 577 | 0.0316% |
| 1964 | * | * | * | 372 | 653 | 0.0334% |
| 1963 | * | * | * | 353 | 724 | 0.0364% |
| 1962 | * | * | * | 346 | 751 | 0.0371% |
| 1961 | * | * | * | 338 | 772 | 0.0372% |
| 1960 | * | * | * | 326 | 834 | 0.0401% |
| 1959 | * | * | * | 305 | 903 | 0.0435% |
| 1958 | * | * | * | 318 | 840 | 0.0407% |
| 1957 | * | * | * | 290 | 968 | 0.0462% |
| 1956 | * | * | * | 256 | 1,069 | 0.0519% |
| 1955 | * | * | * | 246 | 1,107 | 0.0553% |
| 1954 | * | * | * | 229 | 1,241 | 0.0624% |
| 1953 | * | * | * | 223 | 1,290 | 0.0669% |
| 1952 | * | * | * | 209 | 1,373 | 0.0722% |
| 1951 | * | * | * | 189 | 1,521 | 0.0825% |
| 1950 | * | * | * | 189 | 1,451 | 0.0825% |
| 1949 | * | * | * | 172 | 1,625 | 0.0926% |
| 1948 | * | * | * | 163 | 1,768 | 0.1015% |
| 1947 | * | * | * | 152 | 1,907 | 0.1050% |
| 1946 | * | * | * | 150 | 1,783 | 0.1108% |
| 1945 | * | * | * | 131 | 1,853 | 0.1377% |
| 1944 | * | * | * | 131 | 1,993 | 0.1460% |
| 1943 | * | * | * | 127 | 2,202 | 0.1538% |
| 1942 | * | * | * | 121 | 2,260 | 0.1624% |
| 1941 | * | * | * | 108 | 2,364 | 0.1899% |
| 1940 | * | * | * | 101 | 2,458 | 0.2081% |
| 1939 | * | * | * | 88 | 2,688 | 0.2370% |
| 1938 | * | * | * | 86 | 2,866 | 0.2512% |
| 1937 | * | * | * | 78 | 3,064 | 0.2782% |
| 1936 | * | * | * | 74 | 3,197 | 0.2968% |
| 1935 | * | * | * | 76 | 3,184 | 0.2931% |
| 1934 | * | * | * | 65 | 3,648 | 0.3372% |
| 1933 | * | * | * | 57 | 3,632 | 0.3475% |
| 1932 | * | * | * | 51 | 4,281 | 0.3871% |
| 1931 | * | * | * | 53 | 4,429 | 0.4018% |
| 1930 | * | * | * | 45 | 5,243 | 0.4499% |
| 1929 | * | * | * | 41 | 5,472 | 0.4730% |
| 1928 | * | * | * | 40 | 5,960 | 0.4991% |
| 1927 | * | * | * | 38 | 6,300 | 0.5098% |
| 1926 | * | * | * | 36 | 6,584 | 0.5357% |
| 1925 | * | * | * | 35 | 6,822 | 0.5404% |
| 1924 | * | * | * | 33 | 7,304 | 0.5637% |
| 1923 | * | * | * | 31 | 7,386 | 0.5899% |
| 1922 | * | * | * | 32 | 7,228 | 0.5796% |
| 1921 | * | * | * | 30 | 7,837 | 0.6129% |
| 1920 | * | * | * | 31 | 7,812 | 0.6282% |
| 1919 | * | * | * | 31 | 7,562 | 0.6438% |
| 1918 | * | * | * | 32 | 7,740 | 0.6437% |
| 1917 | * | * | * | 32 | 7,239 | 0.6446% |
| 1916 | * | * | * | 29 | 7,283 | 0.6712% |
| 1915 | * | * | * | 30 | 6,763 | 0.6610% |
| 1914 | * | * | * | 26 | 5,484 | 0.6900% |
| 1913 | 928 | 29 | 0.0054% | 26 | 4,580 | 0.7014% |
| 1912 | * | * | * | 26 | 4,173 | 0.7131% |
| 1911 | * | * | * | 27 | 3,157 | 0.7168% |
| 1910 | 751 | 17 | 0.0082% | 25 | 2,966 | 0.7086% |
| 1909 | 884 | 12 | 0.0068% | 26 | 2,610 | 0.7104% |
| 1908 | * | * | * | 26 | 2,517 | 0.7109% |
| 1907 | 770 | 13 | 0.0082% | 28 | 2,338 | 0.6934% |
| 1906 | 750 | 12 | 0.0083% | 31 | 2,114 | 0.6749% |
| 1905 | 833 | 10 | 0.0070% | 36 | 1,944 | 0.6275% |
| 1904 | 870 | 9 | 0.0065% | 37 | 1,757 | 0.6009% |
| 1903 | 840 | 9 | 0.0070% | 47 | 1,479 | 0.5317% |
| 1902 | * | * | * | 52 | 1,310 | 0.4673% |
| 1901 | * | * | * | 57 | 1,090 | 0.4287% |
| 1900 | * | * | * | 73 | 1,094 | 0.3440% |
| 1899 | * | * | * | 78 | 736 | 0.2974% |
| 1898 | * | * | * | 99 | 605 | 0.2207% |
| 1897 | * | * | * | 117 | 419 | 0.1688% |
| 1896 | * | * | * | 168 | 260 | 0.1032% |
| 1895 | * | * | * | 205 | 173 | 0.0700% |
| 1894 | * | * | * | 335 | 70 | 0.0297% |
| 1893 | * | * | * | 421 | 42 | 0.0186% |
| 1892 | * | * | * | 479 | 33 | 0.0147% |
| 1891 | * | * | * | 522 | 25 | 0.0127% |
| 1890 | * | * | * | 568 | 22 | 0.0109% |
| 1889 | * | * | * | 531 | 24 | 0.0127% |
| 1888 | * | * | * | 661 | 16 | 0.0084% |
| 1886 | * | * | * | 689 | 12 | 0.0078% |
| 1884 | * | * | * | 920 | 7 | 0.0051% |
| 1883 | * | * | * | 915 | 6 | 0.0050% |
| 1880 | * | * | * | 936 | 5 | 0.0051% |
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
