Stacey: Statistics About The Baby Name Stacey
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
2006 | * | * | * | 976 | 264 | 0.0128% |
2005 | * | * | * | 847 | 293 | 0.0147% |
2004 | * | * | * | 831 | 292 | 0.0147% |
2003 | * | * | * | 758 | 326 | 0.0163% |
2002 | * | * | * | 769 | 311 | 0.0158% |
2001 | * | * | * | 713 | 343 | 0.0174% |
2000 | * | * | * | 682 | 350 | 0.0176% |
1999 | * | * | * | 649 | 355 | 0.0183% |
1998 | * | * | * | 563 | 437 | 0.0226% |
1997 | * | * | * | 486 | 511 | 0.0268% |
1996 | * | * | * | 436 | 582 | 0.0304% |
1995 | * | * | * | 375 | 699 | 0.0364% |
1994 | * | * | * | 329 | 815 | 0.0419% |
1993 | * | * | * | 276 | 1,001 | 0.0508% |
1992 | 983 | 122 | 0.0058% | 230 | 1,198 | 0.0598% |
1991 | 901 | 137 | 0.0065% | 213 | 1,406 | 0.0692% |
1990 | 875 | 138 | 0.0064% | 168 | 1,734 | 0.0845% |
1989 | 904 | 126 | 0.0060% | 146 | 2,021 | 0.1015% |
1988 | 872 | 119 | 0.0060% | 119 | 2,365 | 0.1233% |
1987 | 887 | 112 | 0.0058% | 103 | 2,707 | 0.1446% |
1986 | 918 | 100 | 0.0052% | 94 | 3,034 | 0.1647% |
1985 | 870 | 109 | 0.0057% | 89 | 3,114 | 0.1689% |
1984 | 928 | 90 | 0.0048% | 79 | 3,647 | 0.2026% |
1983 | 809 | 117 | 0.0063% | 76 | 3,798 | 0.2125% |
1982 | 904 | 98 | 0.0052% | 85 | 3,458 | 0.1909% |
1981 | 774 | 127 | 0.0068% | 83 | 3,752 | 0.2101% |
1980 | 694 | 157 | 0.0085% | 74 | 4,218 | 0.2372% |
1979 | 654 | 171 | 0.0096% | 60 | 4,610 | 0.2678% |
1978 | 590 | 203 | 0.0119% | 53 | 4,992 | 0.3041% |
1977 | 600 | 199 | 0.0117% | 56 | 5,205 | 0.3168% |
1976 | 425 | 335 | 0.0206% | 51 | 5,389 | 0.3431% |
1975 | 356 | 470 | 0.0290% | 44 | 5,926 | 0.3800% |
1974 | 327 | 534 | 0.0328% | 48 | 5,799 | 0.3705% |
1973 | 309 | 569 | 0.0353% | 41 | 6,250 | 0.4024% |
1972 | 330 | 540 | 0.0323% | 41 | 6,380 | 0.3958% |
1971 | 350 | 524 | 0.0289% | 41 | 7,480 | 0.4272% |
1970 | 296 | 688 | 0.0362% | 48 | 7,151 | 0.3906% |
1969 | 251 | 831 | 0.0454% | 52 | 6,614 | 0.3754% |
1968 | 216 | 1,072 | 0.0604% | 55 | 6,147 | 0.3597% |
1967 | 219 | 1,021 | 0.0574% | 69 | 5,121 | 0.2984% |
1966 | 312 | 559 | 0.0308% | 76 | 4,583 | 0.2612% |
1965 | 344 | 494 | 0.0261% | 84 | 4,266 | 0.2335% |
1964 | 413 | 379 | 0.0187% | 126 | 3,361 | 0.1718% |
1963 | 383 | 431 | 0.0209% | 127 | 3,300 | 0.1660% |
1962 | 403 | 404 | 0.0192% | 178 | 2,182 | 0.1077% |
1961 | 458 | 309 | 0.0144% | 227 | 1,454 | 0.0701% |
1960 | 502 | 249 | 0.0115% | 249 | 1,228 | 0.0591% |
1959 | 648 | 142 | 0.0066% | 250 | 1,213 | 0.0584% |
1958 | 693 | 118 | 0.0055% | 275 | 1,040 | 0.0504% |
1957 | 713 | 109 | 0.0050% | 349 | 673 | 0.0321% |
1956 | 773 | 92 | 0.0043% | 410 | 488 | 0.0237% |
1955 | 782 | 87 | 0.0042% | 469 | 374 | 0.0187% |
1954 | 868 | 72 | 0.0035% | 485 | 332 | 0.0167% |
1953 | 877 | 67 | 0.0034% | 696 | 172 | 0.0089% |
1952 | 922 | 60 | 0.0030% | 793 | 130 | 0.0068% |
1951 | 959 | 54 | 0.0028% | 903 | 102 | 0.0055% |
1950 | 925 | 56 | 0.0031% | 976 | 87 | 0.0049% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |