
Sarah: Statistics About The Baby Name Sarah
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
| 2024 | * | * | * | 95 | 2,697 | 0.1526% |
| 2023 | * | * | * | 91 | 2,749 | 0.1572% |
| 2022 | * | * | * | 94 | 2,780 | 0.1558% |
| 2021 | * | * | * | 92 | 2,825 | 0.1588% |
| 2020 | * | * | * | 86 | 3,054 | 0.1733% |
| 2019 | * | * | * | 81 | 3,287 | 0.1803% |
| 2018 | * | * | * | 67 | 3,734 | 0.2023% |
| 2017 | * | * | * | 62 | 3,986 | 0.2126% |
| 2016 | * | * | * | 57 | 4,402 | 0.2283% |
| 2015 | * | * | * | 58 | 4,476 | 0.2313% |
| 2014 | * | * | * | 50 | 4,647 | 0.2397% |
| 2013 | * | * | * | 48 | 4,635 | 0.2428% |
| 2012 | * | * | * | 43 | 5,107 | 0.2658% |
| 2011 | * | * | * | 39 | 5,472 | 0.2849% |
| 2010 | * | * | * | 30 | 6,223 | 0.3205% |
| 2009 | * | * | * | 21 | 7,652 | 0.3822% |
| 2008 | * | * | * | 20 | 8,904 | 0.4332% |
| 2007 | * | * | * | 18 | 9,823 | 0.4713% |
| 2006 | * | * | * | 15 | 10,910 | 0.5304% |
| 2005 | * | * | * | 15 | 11,263 | 0.5654% |
| 2004 | * | * | * | 12 | 12,483 | 0.6284% |
| 2003 | * | * | * | 12 | 13,654 | 0.6847% |
| 2002 | * | * | * | 8 | 14,683 | 0.7468% |
| 2001 | * | * | * | 6 | 15,834 | 0.8023% |
| 2000 | * | * | * | 5 | 17,621 | 0.8856% |
| 1999 | * | * | * | 4 | 19,041 | 0.9804% |
| 1998 | * | * | * | 5 | 19,829 | 1.0250% |
| 1997 | * | * | * | 4 | 20,645 | 1.0832% |
| 1996 | * | * | * | 4 | 20,979 | 1.0958% |
| 1995 | * | * | * | 5 | 21,335 | 1.1118% |
| 1994 | * | * | * | 5 | 22,240 | 1.1425% |
| 1993 | * | * | * | 3 | 24,190 | 1.2287% |
| 1992 | * | * | * | 5 | 24,590 | 1.2282% |
| 1991 | * | * | * | 6 | 25,195 | 1.2404% |
| 1990 | * | * | * | 6 | 25,776 | 1.2564% |
| 1989 | 828 | 145 | 0.0069% | 5 | 27,776 | 1.3953% |
| 1988 | * | * | * | 4 | 28,289 | 1.4746% |
| 1987 | 895 | 110 | 0.0057% | 5 | 27,855 | 1.4884% |
| 1986 | 840 | 117 | 0.0061% | 5 | 28,093 | 1.5251% |
| 1985 | 908 | 100 | 0.0052% | 5 | 24,841 | 1.3475% |
| 1984 | 787 | 122 | 0.0065% | 5 | 25,839 | 1.4353% |
| 1983 | 806 | 118 | 0.0063% | 5 | 27,186 | 1.5213% |
| 1982 | 794 | 124 | 0.0066% | 4 | 28,444 | 1.5706% |
| 1981 | 844 | 109 | 0.0059% | 4 | 28,136 | 1.5757% |
| 1980 | 986 | 84 | 0.0045% | 5 | 25,721 | 1.4467% |
| 1979 | 960 | 85 | 0.0048% | 6 | 20,998 | 1.2199% |
| 1978 | 965 | 81 | 0.0048% | 8 | 19,955 | 1.2155% |
| 1977 | * | * | * | 11 | 18,070 | 1.0997% |
| 1976 | * | * | * | 15 | 13,984 | 0.8904% |
| 1975 | * | * | * | 17 | 11,159 | 0.7156% |
| 1974 | * | * | * | 20 | 9,775 | 0.6245% |
| 1973 | * | * | * | 35 | 7,213 | 0.4644% |
| 1972 | * | * | * | 50 | 6,106 | 0.3788% |
| 1971 | * | * | * | 58 | 5,835 | 0.3333% |
| 1970 | * | * | * | 65 | 5,598 | 0.3058% |
| 1969 | * | * | * | 72 | 5,073 | 0.2879% |
| 1968 | * | * | * | 78 | 4,489 | 0.2627% |
| 1967 | * | * | * | 83 | 4,131 | 0.2407% |
| 1966 | * | * | * | 85 | 4,033 | 0.2298% |
| 1965 | * | * | * | 92 | 4,055 | 0.2220% |
| 1964 | * | * | * | 92 | 4,580 | 0.2341% |
| 1963 | * | * | * | 94 | 4,575 | 0.2302% |
| 1962 | * | * | * | 98 | 4,546 | 0.2243% |
| 1961 | * | * | * | 113 | 4,198 | 0.2024% |
| 1960 | * | * | * | 116 | 4,207 | 0.2023% |
| 1959 | * | * | * | 119 | 3,863 | 0.1859% |
| 1958 | * | * | * | 117 | 3,910 | 0.1895% |
| 1957 | * | * | * | 116 | 3,976 | 0.1896% |
| 1956 | * | * | * | 115 | 3,879 | 0.1884% |
| 1955 | * | * | * | 108 | 3,987 | 0.1990% |
| 1954 | * | * | * | 103 | 4,035 | 0.2027% |
| 1953 | * | * | * | 93 | 4,076 | 0.2115% |
| 1952 | * | * | * | 93 | 4,042 | 0.2125% |
| 1951 | * | * | * | 91 | 4,025 | 0.2183% |
| 1950 | * | * | * | 88 | 4,155 | 0.2363% |
| 1949 | * | * | * | 84 | 4,300 | 0.2451% |
| 1948 | * | * | * | 85 | 4,144 | 0.2380% |
| 1947 | * | * | * | 93 | 4,216 | 0.2322% |
| 1946 | * | * | * | 93 | 3,890 | 0.2416% |
| 1945 | * | * | * | 74 | 3,598 | 0.2673% |
| 1944 | * | * | * | 68 | 3,847 | 0.2818% |
| 1943 | * | * | * | 71 | 3,978 | 0.2778% |
| 1942 | * | * | * | 66 | 4,111 | 0.2954% |
| 1941 | * | * | * | 60 | 3,980 | 0.3197% |
| 1940 | * | * | * | 60 | 3,869 | 0.3276% |
| 1939 | * | * | * | 68 | 3,666 | 0.3233% |
| 1938 | * | * | * | 67 | 3,749 | 0.3285% |
| 1937 | * | * | * | 65 | 3,576 | 0.3247% |
| 1936 | * | * | * | 62 | 3,521 | 0.3269% |
| 1935 | * | * | * | 61 | 3,612 | 0.3325% |
| 1934 | * | * | * | 67 | 3,603 | 0.3331% |
| 1933 | * | * | * | 58 | 3,615 | 0.3459% |
| 1932 | * | * | * | 67 | 3,596 | 0.3252% |
| 1931 | * | * | * | 71 | 3,630 | 0.3293% |
| 1930 | * | * | * | 70 | 3,916 | 0.3360% |
| 1929 | * | * | * | 68 | 3,816 | 0.3298% |
| 1928 | * | * | * | 64 | 4,253 | 0.3561% |
| 1927 | * | * | * | 61 | 4,555 | 0.3686% |
| 1926 | * | * | * | 63 | 4,418 | 0.3595% |
| 1925 | * | * | * | 58 | 4,677 | 0.3705% |
| 1924 | * | * | * | 55 | 5,036 | 0.3887% |
| 1923 | * | * | * | 53 | 4,976 | 0.3974% |
| 1922 | * | * | * | 52 | 4,976 | 0.3990% |
| 1921 | * | * | * | 54 | 5,012 | 0.3920% |
| 1920 | * | * | * | 50 | 5,019 | 0.4036% |
| 1919 | * | * | * | 46 | 5,026 | 0.4279% |
| 1918 | * | * | * | 52 | 4,967 | 0.4131% |
| 1917 | * | * | * | 52 | 4,766 | 0.4244% |
| 1916 | * | * | * | 52 | 4,792 | 0.4417% |
| 1915 | * | * | * | 51 | 4,408 | 0.4308% |
| 1914 | * | * | * | 46 | 3,674 | 0.4623% |
| 1913 | * | * | * | 43 | 3,170 | 0.4854% |
| 1912 | * | * | * | 41 | 2,912 | 0.4976% |
| 1911 | * | * | * | 42 | 2,194 | 0.4981% |
| 1910 | * | * | * | 40 | 2,166 | 0.5175% |
| 1909 | 947 | 11 | 0.0062% | 49 | 1,844 | 0.5019% |
| 1908 | * | * | * | 48 | 1,812 | 0.5118% |
| 1907 | * | * | * | 48 | 1,800 | 0.5339% |
| 1906 | * | * | * | 44 | 1,697 | 0.5418% |
| 1905 | * | * | * | 41 | 1,763 | 0.5691% |
| 1904 | * | * | * | 43 | 1,594 | 0.5451% |
| 1903 | * | * | * | 41 | 1,553 | 0.5583% |
| 1902 | * | * | * | 39 | 1,710 | 0.6100% |
| 1901 | * | * | * | 40 | 1,513 | 0.5951% |
| 1900 | * | * | * | 37 | 2,055 | 0.6461% |
| 1899 | 654 | 11 | 0.0095% | 38 | 1,586 | 0.6408% |
| 1898 | * | * | * | 37 | 1,800 | 0.6565% |
| 1897 | 779 | 9 | 0.0074% | 34 | 1,713 | 0.6900% |
| 1896 | * | * | * | 35 | 1,691 | 0.6710% |
| 1895 | 860 | 8 | 0.0063% | 33 | 1,777 | 0.7191% |
| 1894 | 721 | 10 | 0.0080% | 34 | 1,701 | 0.7208% |
| 1893 | * | * | * | 33 | 1,632 | 0.7246% |
| 1892 | * | * | * | 28 | 1,799 | 0.7998% |
| 1891 | * | * | * | 24 | 1,669 | 0.8490% |
| 1890 | * | * | * | 21 | 1,786 | 0.8856% |
| 1889 | * | * | * | 20 | 1,731 | 0.9147% |
| 1888 | * | * | * | 20 | 1,755 | 0.9263% |
| 1887 | * | * | * | 20 | 1,436 | 0.9238% |
| 1886 | 950 | 6 | 0.0050% | 16 | 1,570 | 1.0211% |
| 1885 | 824 | 7 | 0.0060% | 18 | 1,424 | 1.0031% |
| 1884 | 955 | 6 | 0.0049% | 14 | 1,519 | 1.1040% |
| 1883 | 790 | 7 | 0.0062% | 12 | 1,359 | 1.1318% |
| 1882 | * | * | * | 12 | 1,410 | 1.2186% |
| 1881 | * | * | * | 12 | 1,226 | 1.2400% |
| 1880 | * | * | * | 10 | 1,288 | 1.3194% |
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
