
Sammie: Statistics About The Baby Name Sammie
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls | 
| 1983 | 998 | 79 | 0.0042% | * | * | * | 
| 1981 | 882 | 102 | 0.0055% | * | * | * | 
| 1980 | 950 | 90 | 0.0049% | * | * | * | 
| 1979 | 869 | 101 | 0.0056% | * | * | * | 
| 1978 | 900 | 92 | 0.0054% | * | * | * | 
| 1977 | 916 | 86 | 0.0050% | * | * | * | 
| 1976 | 920 | 83 | 0.0051% | * | * | * | 
| 1975 | 832 | 100 | 0.0062% | * | * | * | 
| 1974 | 721 | 129 | 0.0079% | * | * | * | 
| 1973 | 735 | 119 | 0.0074% | * | * | * | 
| 1972 | 651 | 151 | 0.0090% | * | * | * | 
| 1971 | 662 | 155 | 0.0085% | * | * | * | 
| 1970 | 657 | 155 | 0.0081% | * | * | * | 
| 1969 | 636 | 156 | 0.0085% | * | * | * | 
| 1968 | 631 | 144 | 0.0081% | * | * | * | 
| 1967 | 580 | 169 | 0.0095% | * | * | * | 
| 1966 | 551 | 194 | 0.0107% | * | * | * | 
| 1965 | 545 | 197 | 0.0104% | * | * | * | 
| 1964 | 548 | 208 | 0.0103% | * | * | * | 
| 1963 | 511 | 247 | 0.0120% | * | * | * | 
| 1962 | 508 | 242 | 0.0115% | * | * | * | 
| 1961 | 483 | 273 | 0.0127% | * | * | * | 
| 1960 | 469 | 287 | 0.0133% | * | * | * | 
| 1959 | 472 | 278 | 0.0128% | * | * | * | 
| 1958 | 447 | 306 | 0.0142% | * | * | * | 
| 1957 | 450 | 294 | 0.0135% | * | * | * | 
| 1956 | 419 | 324 | 0.0151% | * | * | * | 
| 1955 | 391 | 342 | 0.0164% | * | * | * | 
| 1954 | 370 | 361 | 0.0175% | * | * | * | 
| 1953 | 360 | 360 | 0.0180% | * | * | * | 
| 1952 | 360 | 353 | 0.0179% | 963 | 96 | 0.0050% | 
| 1951 | 342 | 398 | 0.0209% | 937 | 98 | 0.0053% | 
| 1950 | 340 | 394 | 0.0217% | 911 | 96 | 0.0055% | 
| 1949 | 331 | 429 | 0.0239% | 821 | 114 | 0.0065% | 
| 1948 | 311 | 471 | 0.0265% | 808 | 115 | 0.0066% | 
| 1947 | 311 | 492 | 0.0266% | 707 | 145 | 0.0080% | 
| 1946 | 317 | 409 | 0.0249% | 645 | 150 | 0.0093% | 
| 1945 | 293 | 413 | 0.0302% | 655 | 127 | 0.0094% | 
| 1944 | 285 | 431 | 0.0311% | 586 | 157 | 0.0115% | 
| 1943 | 307 | 407 | 0.0281% | 555 | 186 | 0.0130% | 
| 1942 | 299 | 414 | 0.0294% | 557 | 179 | 0.0129% | 
| 1941 | 304 | 357 | 0.0285% | 572 | 149 | 0.0120% | 
| 1940 | 303 | 342 | 0.0288% | 597 | 136 | 0.0115% | 
| 1939 | 302 | 346 | 0.0305% | 606 | 125 | 0.0110% | 
| 1938 | 294 | 347 | 0.0306% | 598 | 134 | 0.0117% | 
| 1937 | 310 | 299 | 0.0274% | 574 | 139 | 0.0126% | 
| 1936 | 299 | 319 | 0.0300% | 548 | 143 | 0.0133% | 
| 1935 | 298 | 331 | 0.0310% | 578 | 125 | 0.0115% | 
| 1934 | 292 | 340 | 0.0321% | 557 | 133 | 0.0123% | 
| 1933 | 311 | 299 | 0.0294% | 551 | 134 | 0.0128% | 
| 1932 | 297 | 344 | 0.0321% | 563 | 134 | 0.0121% | 
| 1931 | 298 | 347 | 0.0325% | 612 | 118 | 0.0107% | 
| 1930 | 303 | 352 | 0.0312% | 602 | 132 | 0.0113% | 
| 1929 | 313 | 308 | 0.0279% | 716 | 97 | 0.0084% | 
| 1928 | 305 | 332 | 0.0291% | 594 | 141 | 0.0118% | 
| 1927 | 317 | 328 | 0.0283% | 657 | 120 | 0.0097% | 
| 1926 | 342 | 285 | 0.0249% | 634 | 129 | 0.0105% | 
| 1925 | 345 | 286 | 0.0249% | 678 | 120 | 0.0095% | 
| 1924 | 362 | 274 | 0.0235% | 668 | 124 | 0.0096% | 
| 1923 | 376 | 253 | 0.0223% | 679 | 121 | 0.0097% | 
| 1922 | 380 | 251 | 0.0223% | 657 | 123 | 0.0099% | 
| 1921 | 366 | 272 | 0.0239% | 820 | 81 | 0.0063% | 
| 1920 | 371 | 261 | 0.0237% | 687 | 113 | 0.0091% | 
| 1919 | 377 | 236 | 0.0232% | 652 | 114 | 0.0097% | 
| 1918 | 360 | 263 | 0.0250% | 675 | 113 | 0.0094% | 
| 1917 | 436 | 170 | 0.0177% | 686 | 100 | 0.0089% | 
| 1916 | 452 | 154 | 0.0167% | 913 | 56 | 0.0052% | 
| 1915 | 431 | 159 | 0.0180% | 846 | 60 | 0.0059% | 
| 1914 | 421 | 131 | 0.0192% | 768 | 57 | 0.0072% | 
| 1913 | 462 | 87 | 0.0162% | 773 | 47 | 0.0072% | 
| 1912 | 493 | 65 | 0.0144% | 806 | 39 | 0.0067% | 
| 1911 | 346 | 63 | 0.0262% | 797 | 30 | 0.0068% | 
| 1910 | 373 | 48 | 0.0231% | 792 | 30 | 0.0072% | 
| 1909 | 381 | 40 | 0.0226% | 788 | 27 | 0.0073% | 
| 1908 | 449 | 30 | 0.0180% | 627 | 38 | 0.0107% | 
| 1907 | 356 | 39 | 0.0246% | 985 | 16 | 0.0047% | 
| 1906 | 384 | 32 | 0.0222% | 956 | 16 | 0.0051% | 
| 1905 | 369 | 32 | 0.0223% | 820 | 21 | 0.0068% | 
| 1904 | 349 | 34 | 0.0245% | 665 | 28 | 0.0096% | 
| 1903 | 690 | 12 | 0.0093% | 832 | 18 | 0.0065% | 
| 1902 | 473 | 21 | 0.0158% | 867 | 17 | 0.0061% | 
| 1901 | 450 | 19 | 0.0164% | 741 | 20 | 0.0079% | 
| 1900 | 402 | 32 | 0.0197% | 796 | 22 | 0.0069% | 
| 1899 | 435 | 19 | 0.0165% | 677 | 22 | 0.0089% | 
| 1898 | 602 | 14 | 0.0106% | 837 | 17 | 0.0062% | 
| 1897 | 644 | 12 | 0.0098% | 973 | 12 | 0.0048% | 
| 1896 | 668 | 12 | 0.0093% | 837 | 16 | 0.0063% | 
| 1895 | 523 | 16 | 0.0126% | * | * | * | 
| 1894 | 940 | 7 | 0.0056% | * | * | * | 
| 1893 | 698 | 10 | 0.0083% | 951 | 11 | 0.0049% | 
| 1892 | 633 | 12 | 0.0091% | * | * | * | 
| 1891 | 588 | 11 | 0.0101% | * | * | * | 
| 1890 | 728 | 9 | 0.0075% | 819 | 12 | 0.0060% | 
| 1889 | 517 | 14 | 0.0118% | 656 | 16 | 0.0085% | 
| 1888 | 806 | 8 | 0.0062% | 833 | 11 | 0.0058% | 
| 1882 | 824 | 7 | 0.0057% | * | * | * | 
| 1881 | * | * | * | 812 | 6 | 0.0061% | 
| 1880 | 893 | 6 | 0.0051% | 824 | 6 | 0.0061% | 
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
