
Ruthie: Statistics About The Baby Name Ruthie
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
| 2024 | * | * | * | 885 | 305 | 0.0173% |
| 2023 | * | * | * | 920 | 286 | 0.0164% |
| 1967 | * | * | * | 973 | 111 | 0.0065% |
| 1966 | * | * | * | 924 | 120 | 0.0068% |
| 1965 | * | * | * | 813 | 150 | 0.0082% |
| 1964 | * | * | * | 753 | 191 | 0.0098% |
| 1963 | * | * | * | 730 | 196 | 0.0099% |
| 1962 | * | * | * | 713 | 209 | 0.0103% |
| 1961 | * | * | * | 679 | 233 | 0.0112% |
| 1960 | * | * | * | 608 | 272 | 0.0131% |
| 1959 | * | * | * | 583 | 287 | 0.0138% |
| 1958 | * | * | * | 590 | 284 | 0.0138% |
| 1957 | * | * | * | 535 | 321 | 0.0153% |
| 1956 | * | * | * | 517 | 329 | 0.0160% |
| 1955 | * | * | * | 525 | 307 | 0.0153% |
| 1954 | * | * | * | 483 | 335 | 0.0168% |
| 1953 | * | * | * | 449 | 368 | 0.0191% |
| 1952 | * | * | * | 443 | 378 | 0.0199% |
| 1951 | * | * | * | 472 | 310 | 0.0168% |
| 1950 | * | * | * | 416 | 371 | 0.0211% |
| 1949 | * | * | * | 399 | 402 | 0.0229% |
| 1948 | * | * | * | 400 | 399 | 0.0229% |
| 1947 | * | * | * | 394 | 412 | 0.0227% |
| 1946 | * | * | * | 368 | 420 | 0.0261% |
| 1945 | * | * | * | 360 | 375 | 0.0279% |
| 1944 | * | * | * | 348 | 391 | 0.0286% |
| 1943 | * | * | * | 372 | 371 | 0.0259% |
| 1942 | * | * | * | 344 | 414 | 0.0297% |
| 1941 | * | * | * | 347 | 361 | 0.0290% |
| 1940 | * | * | * | 318 | 398 | 0.0337% |
| 1939 | * | * | * | 314 | 389 | 0.0343% |
| 1938 | * | * | * | 320 | 383 | 0.0336% |
| 1937 | * | * | * | 318 | 377 | 0.0342% |
| 1936 | * | * | * | 318 | 371 | 0.0344% |
| 1935 | * | * | * | 309 | 401 | 0.0369% |
| 1934 | * | * | * | 323 | 374 | 0.0346% |
| 1933 | * | * | * | 328 | 367 | 0.0351% |
| 1932 | * | * | * | 335 | 361 | 0.0326% |
| 1931 | * | * | * | 338 | 357 | 0.0324% |
| 1930 | * | * | * | 330 | 400 | 0.0343% |
| 1929 | * | * | * | 330 | 386 | 0.0334% |
| 1928 | * | * | * | 344 | 386 | 0.0323% |
| 1927 | * | * | * | 327 | 423 | 0.0342% |
| 1926 | * | * | * | 325 | 411 | 0.0334% |
| 1925 | * | * | * | 345 | 383 | 0.0303% |
| 1924 | * | * | * | 356 | 374 | 0.0289% |
| 1923 | * | * | * | 371 | 319 | 0.0255% |
| 1922 | * | * | * | 419 | 251 | 0.0201% |
| 1921 | * | * | * | 444 | 241 | 0.0188% |
| 1920 | * | * | * | 438 | 235 | 0.0189% |
| 1919 | * | * | * | 484 | 191 | 0.0163% |
| 1918 | * | * | * | 516 | 179 | 0.0149% |
| 1917 | * | * | * | 557 | 147 | 0.0131% |
| 1916 | * | * | * | 560 | 144 | 0.0133% |
| 1915 | * | * | * | 602 | 119 | 0.0116% |
| 1914 | * | * | * | 545 | 107 | 0.0135% |
| 1913 | * | * | * | 520 | 96 | 0.0147% |
| 1912 | * | * | * | 509 | 90 | 0.0154% |
| 1911 | * | * | * | 528 | 63 | 0.0143% |
| 1910 | * | * | * | 534 | 59 | 0.0141% |
| 1909 | * | * | * | 640 | 38 | 0.0103% |
| 1908 | * | * | * | 545 | 47 | 0.0133% |
| 1907 | * | * | * | 598 | 39 | 0.0116% |
| 1906 | * | * | * | 547 | 42 | 0.0134% |
| 1905 | * | * | * | 639 | 31 | 0.0100% |
| 1904 | * | * | * | 708 | 25 | 0.0085% |
| 1903 | * | * | * | 652 | 27 | 0.0097% |
| 1902 | * | * | * | 752 | 22 | 0.0078% |
| 1901 | * | * | * | 627 | 26 | 0.0102% |
| 1900 | * | * | * | 829 | 21 | 0.0066% |
| 1899 | * | * | * | 785 | 18 | 0.0073% |
| 1898 | * | * | * | 712 | 22 | 0.0080% |
| 1897 | * | * | * | 674 | 22 | 0.0089% |
| 1896 | * | * | * | 648 | 24 | 0.0095% |
| 1895 | * | * | * | 592 | 27 | 0.0109% |
| 1894 | * | * | * | 808 | 15 | 0.0064% |
| 1893 | * | * | * | 735 | 17 | 0.0075% |
| 1892 | * | * | * | 900 | 12 | 0.0053% |
| 1891 | * | * | * | 886 | 11 | 0.0056% |
| 1889 | * | * | * | 792 | 12 | 0.0063% |
| 1888 | * | * | * | 883 | 10 | 0.0053% |
| 1887 | * | * | * | 846 | 9 | 0.0058% |
| 1885 | * | * | * | 912 | 7 | 0.0049% |
| 1883 | * | * | * | 910 | 6 | 0.0050% |
| 1882 | * | * | * | 886 | 6 | 0.0052% |
| 1881 | * | * | * | 810 | 6 | 0.0061% |
| 1880 | * | * | * | 925 | 5 | 0.0051% |
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
