Ruth: Statistics About The Baby Name Ruth
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
2023 | * | * | * | 187 | 1,594 | 0.0911% |
2022 | * | * | * | 179 | 1,656 | 0.0928% |
2021 | * | * | * | 189 | 1,553 | 0.0873% |
2020 | * | * | * | 219 | 1,323 | 0.0751% |
2019 | * | * | * | 231 | 1,335 | 0.0732% |
2018 | * | * | * | 265 | 1,234 | 0.0668% |
2017 | * | * | * | 265 | 1,194 | 0.0637% |
2016 | * | * | * | 298 | 1,094 | 0.0567% |
2015 | * | * | * | 293 | 1,092 | 0.0564% |
2014 | * | * | * | 315 | 1,042 | 0.0538% |
2013 | * | * | * | 329 | 970 | 0.0508% |
2012 | * | * | * | 344 | 914 | 0.0476% |
2011 | * | * | * | 362 | 885 | 0.0461% |
2010 | * | * | * | 348 | 915 | 0.0471% |
2009 | * | * | * | 357 | 898 | 0.0449% |
2008 | * | * | * | 362 | 899 | 0.0437% |
2007 | * | * | * | 347 | 932 | 0.0447% |
2006 | * | * | * | 373 | 860 | 0.0418% |
2005 | * | * | * | 351 | 880 | 0.0442% |
2004 | * | * | * | 352 | 883 | 0.0445% |
2003 | * | * | * | 354 | 868 | 0.0435% |
2002 | * | * | * | 338 | 888 | 0.0452% |
2001 | * | * | * | 331 | 926 | 0.0469% |
2000 | * | * | * | 344 | 890 | 0.0447% |
1999 | * | * | * | 350 | 854 | 0.0440% |
1998 | * | * | * | 347 | 835 | 0.0432% |
1997 | * | * | * | 336 | 846 | 0.0444% |
1996 | * | * | * | 351 | 789 | 0.0412% |
1995 | * | * | * | 323 | 840 | 0.0438% |
1994 | * | * | * | 311 | 871 | 0.0447% |
1993 | * | * | * | 316 | 841 | 0.0427% |
1992 | * | * | * | 323 | 841 | 0.0420% |
1991 | * | * | * | 287 | 980 | 0.0482% |
1990 | * | * | * | 306 | 899 | 0.0438% |
1989 | * | * | * | 277 | 970 | 0.0487% |
1988 | * | * | * | 257 | 988 | 0.0515% |
1987 | * | * | * | 251 | 1,016 | 0.0543% |
1986 | * | * | * | 243 | 1,074 | 0.0583% |
1985 | * | * | * | 233 | 1,114 | 0.0604% |
1984 | * | * | * | 223 | 1,158 | 0.0643% |
1983 | * | * | * | 224 | 1,117 | 0.0625% |
1982 | * | * | * | 222 | 1,177 | 0.0650% |
1981 | * | * | * | 209 | 1,261 | 0.0706% |
1980 | * | * | * | 207 | 1,255 | 0.0706% |
1979 | * | * | * | 216 | 1,200 | 0.0697% |
1978 | * | * | * | 213 | 1,204 | 0.0733% |
1977 | * | * | * | 212 | 1,182 | 0.0719% |
1976 | * | * | * | 205 | 1,199 | 0.0763% |
1975 | * | * | * | 199 | 1,227 | 0.0787% |
1974 | * | * | * | 195 | 1,306 | 0.0834% |
1973 | * | * | * | 202 | 1,271 | 0.0818% |
1972 | * | * | * | 201 | 1,390 | 0.0862% |
1971 | * | * | * | 191 | 1,620 | 0.0925% |
1970 | * | * | * | 178 | 1,820 | 0.0994% |
1969 | * | * | * | 168 | 1,900 | 0.1078% |
1968 | * | * | * | 149 | 2,152 | 0.1259% |
1967 | * | * | * | 145 | 2,421 | 0.1411% |
1966 | * | * | * | 128 | 2,845 | 0.1621% |
1965 | * | * | * | 118 | 3,237 | 0.1772% |
1964 | * | * | * | 114 | 3,637 | 0.1859% |
1963 | * | * | * | 113 | 3,863 | 0.1944% |
1962 | * | * | * | 104 | 4,296 | 0.2120% |
1961 | * | * | * | 96 | 4,887 | 0.2356% |
1960 | * | * | * | 97 | 4,946 | 0.2378% |
1959 | * | * | * | 97 | 5,052 | 0.2431% |
1958 | * | * | * | 90 | 5,246 | 0.2542% |
1957 | * | * | * | 84 | 5,664 | 0.2701% |
1956 | * | * | * | 78 | 6,060 | 0.2944% |
1955 | * | * | * | 69 | 6,191 | 0.3090% |
1954 | * | * | * | 66 | 6,561 | 0.3297% |
1953 | * | * | * | 62 | 6,576 | 0.3412% |
1952 | * | * | * | 58 | 6,933 | 0.3645% |
1951 | * | * | * | 53 | 7,074 | 0.3837% |
1950 | * | * | * | 49 | 7,123 | 0.4051% |
1949 | * | * | * | 47 | 7,649 | 0.4360% |
1948 | * | * | * | 45 | 7,896 | 0.4535% |
1947 | * | * | * | 44 | 8,483 | 0.4671% |
1946 | * | * | * | 38 | 8,456 | 0.5253% |
1945 | * | * | * | 33 | 8,037 | 0.5971% |
1944 | * | * | * | 32 | 8,668 | 0.6350% |
1943 | * | * | * | 33 | 9,343 | 0.6525% |
1942 | * | * | * | 33 | 9,328 | 0.6702% |
1941 | * | * | * | 28 | 8,851 | 0.7111% |
1940 | * | * | * | 24 | 8,884 | 0.7522% |
1939 | 884 | 50 | 0.0044% | 22 | 9,063 | 0.7992% |
1938 | 975 | 43 | 0.0038% | 21 | 9,300 | 0.8150% |
1937 | 888 | 49 | 0.0045% | 15 | 9,596 | 0.8713% |
1936 | 949 | 43 | 0.0040% | 15 | 9,216 | 0.8557% |
1935 | 875 | 52 | 0.0049% | 15 | 9,978 | 0.9186% |
1934 | 767 | 65 | 0.0061% | 13 | 10,559 | 0.9761% |
1933 | 865 | 52 | 0.0051% | 13 | 11,132 | 1.0650% |
1932 | 708 | 77 | 0.0072% | 11 | 12,249 | 1.1076% |
1931 | 808 | 61 | 0.0057% | 11 | 13,127 | 1.1908% |
1930 | 773 | 69 | 0.0061% | 10 | 14,917 | 1.2800% |
1929 | 776 | 69 | 0.0062% | 8 | 16,018 | 1.3845% |
1928 | 796 | 68 | 0.0060% | 6 | 17,829 | 1.4929% |
1927 | 670 | 92 | 0.0079% | 6 | 19,411 | 1.5708% |
1926 | 754 | 73 | 0.0064% | 6 | 20,179 | 1.6419% |
1925 | 760 | 76 | 0.0066% | 6 | 22,248 | 1.7624% |
1924 | 805 | 71 | 0.0061% | 6 | 23,594 | 1.8209% |
1923 | 859 | 63 | 0.0056% | 6 | 23,642 | 1.8881% |
1922 | 786 | 73 | 0.0065% | 5 | 23,622 | 1.8941% |
1921 | 927 | 58 | 0.0051% | 5 | 25,775 | 2.0158% |
1920 | 946 | 54 | 0.0049% | 5 | 26,082 | 2.0975% |
1919 | 826 | 63 | 0.0062% | 5 | 24,567 | 2.0917% |
1918 | 987 | 47 | 0.0045% | 5 | 25,552 | 2.1251% |
1917 | 901 | 51 | 0.0053% | 5 | 23,549 | 2.0968% |
1916 | 853 | 55 | 0.0060% | 5 | 23,175 | 2.1360% |
1915 | 938 | 45 | 0.0051% | 5 | 21,867 | 2.1373% |
1914 | 792 | 45 | 0.0066% | 5 | 15,808 | 1.9890% |
1913 | 850 | 33 | 0.0062% | 5 | 12,568 | 1.9246% |
1912 | 648 | 43 | 0.0095% | 5 | 11,235 | 1.9200% |
1911 | 594 | 27 | 0.0112% | 5 | 7,976 | 1.8109% |
1910 | 468 | 35 | 0.0168% | 5 | 7,200 | 1.7202% |
1909 | 670 | 17 | 0.0096% | 4 | 6,499 | 1.7689% |
1908 | 608 | 19 | 0.0114% | 4 | 6,172 | 1.7433% |
1907 | 694 | 15 | 0.0095% | 5 | 5,567 | 1.6511% |
1906 | 560 | 18 | 0.0125% | 5 | 5,137 | 1.6400% |
1905 | 522 | 20 | 0.0140% | 5 | 5,065 | 1.6350% |
1904 | 608 | 15 | 0.0108% | 5 | 4,900 | 1.6757% |
1903 | 651 | 13 | 0.0100% | 5 | 4,521 | 1.6254% |
1902 | 533 | 17 | 0.0128% | 5 | 4,383 | 1.5636% |
1901 | 528 | 15 | 0.0130% | 5 | 3,974 | 1.5632% |
1900 | 645 | 16 | 0.0098% | 5 | 4,765 | 1.4981% |
1899 | 771 | 9 | 0.0078% | 5 | 3,911 | 1.5802% |
1898 | 568 | 15 | 0.0114% | 5 | 4,249 | 1.5498% |
1897 | 435 | 20 | 0.0164% | 5 | 3,877 | 1.5616% |
1896 | 667 | 12 | 0.0093% | 5 | 3,905 | 1.5495% |
1895 | 968 | 7 | 0.0055% | 6 | 3,551 | 1.4370% |
1894 | 535 | 15 | 0.0120% | 6 | 3,372 | 1.4289% |
1893 | 607 | 12 | 0.0099% | 3 | 3,658 | 1.6240% |
1892 | 632 | 12 | 0.0091% | 5 | 3,291 | 1.4631% |
1891 | * | * | * | 19 | 1,858 | 0.9451% |
1890 | * | * | * | 46 | 1,195 | 0.5925% |
1889 | * | * | * | 46 | 1,074 | 0.5676% |
1888 | * | * | * | 59 | 850 | 0.4486% |
1887 | * | * | * | 62 | 627 | 0.4034% |
1886 | * | * | * | 66 | 581 | 0.3779% |
1885 | * | * | * | 70 | 507 | 0.3571% |
1884 | * | * | * | 74 | 442 | 0.3212% |
1883 | * | * | * | 74 | 387 | 0.3223% |
1882 | * | * | * | 80 | 323 | 0.2792% |
1881 | * | * | * | 84 | 277 | 0.2802% |
1880 | * | * | * | 93 | 234 | 0.2397% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |