
Ruth: Statistics About The Baby Name Ruth
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls | 
| 2024 | * | * | * | 172 | 1,767 | 0.1000% | 
| 2023 | * | * | * | 187 | 1,594 | 0.0911% | 
| 2022 | * | * | * | 179 | 1,656 | 0.0928% | 
| 2021 | * | * | * | 189 | 1,553 | 0.0873% | 
| 2020 | * | * | * | 219 | 1,323 | 0.0751% | 
| 2019 | * | * | * | 231 | 1,335 | 0.0732% | 
| 2018 | * | * | * | 265 | 1,234 | 0.0668% | 
| 2017 | * | * | * | 265 | 1,194 | 0.0637% | 
| 2016 | * | * | * | 298 | 1,094 | 0.0567% | 
| 2015 | * | * | * | 293 | 1,092 | 0.0564% | 
| 2014 | * | * | * | 315 | 1,042 | 0.0538% | 
| 2013 | * | * | * | 329 | 970 | 0.0508% | 
| 2012 | * | * | * | 344 | 914 | 0.0476% | 
| 2011 | * | * | * | 362 | 885 | 0.0461% | 
| 2010 | * | * | * | 348 | 915 | 0.0471% | 
| 2009 | * | * | * | 357 | 898 | 0.0449% | 
| 2008 | * | * | * | 362 | 899 | 0.0437% | 
| 2007 | * | * | * | 347 | 932 | 0.0447% | 
| 2006 | * | * | * | 373 | 860 | 0.0418% | 
| 2005 | * | * | * | 351 | 880 | 0.0442% | 
| 2004 | * | * | * | 352 | 883 | 0.0445% | 
| 2003 | * | * | * | 354 | 868 | 0.0435% | 
| 2002 | * | * | * | 338 | 888 | 0.0452% | 
| 2001 | * | * | * | 331 | 926 | 0.0469% | 
| 2000 | * | * | * | 344 | 890 | 0.0447% | 
| 1999 | * | * | * | 350 | 854 | 0.0440% | 
| 1998 | * | * | * | 347 | 835 | 0.0432% | 
| 1997 | * | * | * | 336 | 846 | 0.0444% | 
| 1996 | * | * | * | 351 | 789 | 0.0412% | 
| 1995 | * | * | * | 323 | 840 | 0.0438% | 
| 1994 | * | * | * | 311 | 871 | 0.0447% | 
| 1993 | * | * | * | 316 | 841 | 0.0427% | 
| 1992 | * | * | * | 323 | 841 | 0.0420% | 
| 1991 | * | * | * | 287 | 980 | 0.0482% | 
| 1990 | * | * | * | 306 | 899 | 0.0438% | 
| 1989 | * | * | * | 277 | 970 | 0.0487% | 
| 1988 | * | * | * | 257 | 988 | 0.0515% | 
| 1987 | * | * | * | 251 | 1,016 | 0.0543% | 
| 1986 | * | * | * | 243 | 1,074 | 0.0583% | 
| 1985 | * | * | * | 233 | 1,114 | 0.0604% | 
| 1984 | * | * | * | 223 | 1,158 | 0.0643% | 
| 1983 | * | * | * | 224 | 1,117 | 0.0625% | 
| 1982 | * | * | * | 222 | 1,177 | 0.0650% | 
| 1981 | * | * | * | 209 | 1,261 | 0.0706% | 
| 1980 | * | * | * | 207 | 1,255 | 0.0706% | 
| 1979 | * | * | * | 216 | 1,200 | 0.0697% | 
| 1978 | * | * | * | 213 | 1,204 | 0.0733% | 
| 1977 | * | * | * | 212 | 1,182 | 0.0719% | 
| 1976 | * | * | * | 205 | 1,199 | 0.0763% | 
| 1975 | * | * | * | 199 | 1,227 | 0.0787% | 
| 1974 | * | * | * | 195 | 1,306 | 0.0834% | 
| 1973 | * | * | * | 202 | 1,271 | 0.0818% | 
| 1972 | * | * | * | 201 | 1,390 | 0.0862% | 
| 1971 | * | * | * | 191 | 1,620 | 0.0925% | 
| 1970 | * | * | * | 178 | 1,820 | 0.0994% | 
| 1969 | * | * | * | 168 | 1,900 | 0.1078% | 
| 1968 | * | * | * | 149 | 2,152 | 0.1259% | 
| 1967 | * | * | * | 145 | 2,421 | 0.1411% | 
| 1966 | * | * | * | 128 | 2,845 | 0.1621% | 
| 1965 | * | * | * | 118 | 3,237 | 0.1772% | 
| 1964 | * | * | * | 114 | 3,637 | 0.1859% | 
| 1963 | * | * | * | 113 | 3,863 | 0.1944% | 
| 1962 | * | * | * | 104 | 4,296 | 0.2120% | 
| 1961 | * | * | * | 96 | 4,887 | 0.2356% | 
| 1960 | * | * | * | 97 | 4,946 | 0.2378% | 
| 1959 | * | * | * | 97 | 5,052 | 0.2431% | 
| 1958 | * | * | * | 90 | 5,246 | 0.2542% | 
| 1957 | * | * | * | 84 | 5,664 | 0.2701% | 
| 1956 | * | * | * | 78 | 6,060 | 0.2944% | 
| 1955 | * | * | * | 69 | 6,191 | 0.3090% | 
| 1954 | * | * | * | 66 | 6,561 | 0.3297% | 
| 1953 | * | * | * | 62 | 6,576 | 0.3412% | 
| 1952 | * | * | * | 58 | 6,933 | 0.3645% | 
| 1951 | * | * | * | 53 | 7,074 | 0.3837% | 
| 1950 | * | * | * | 49 | 7,123 | 0.4051% | 
| 1949 | * | * | * | 47 | 7,649 | 0.4360% | 
| 1948 | * | * | * | 45 | 7,896 | 0.4535% | 
| 1947 | * | * | * | 44 | 8,483 | 0.4671% | 
| 1946 | * | * | * | 38 | 8,456 | 0.5253% | 
| 1945 | * | * | * | 33 | 8,037 | 0.5971% | 
| 1944 | * | * | * | 32 | 8,668 | 0.6350% | 
| 1943 | * | * | * | 33 | 9,343 | 0.6525% | 
| 1942 | * | * | * | 33 | 9,328 | 0.6702% | 
| 1941 | * | * | * | 28 | 8,851 | 0.7111% | 
| 1940 | * | * | * | 24 | 8,884 | 0.7522% | 
| 1939 | 884 | 50 | 0.0044% | 22 | 9,063 | 0.7992% | 
| 1938 | 975 | 43 | 0.0038% | 21 | 9,300 | 0.8150% | 
| 1937 | 888 | 49 | 0.0045% | 15 | 9,596 | 0.8713% | 
| 1936 | 949 | 43 | 0.0040% | 15 | 9,216 | 0.8557% | 
| 1935 | 875 | 52 | 0.0049% | 15 | 9,978 | 0.9186% | 
| 1934 | 767 | 65 | 0.0061% | 13 | 10,559 | 0.9761% | 
| 1933 | 865 | 52 | 0.0051% | 13 | 11,132 | 1.0650% | 
| 1932 | 708 | 77 | 0.0072% | 11 | 12,249 | 1.1076% | 
| 1931 | 808 | 61 | 0.0057% | 11 | 13,127 | 1.1908% | 
| 1930 | 773 | 69 | 0.0061% | 10 | 14,917 | 1.2800% | 
| 1929 | 776 | 69 | 0.0062% | 8 | 16,018 | 1.3845% | 
| 1928 | 796 | 68 | 0.0060% | 6 | 17,829 | 1.4929% | 
| 1927 | 670 | 92 | 0.0079% | 6 | 19,411 | 1.5708% | 
| 1926 | 754 | 73 | 0.0064% | 6 | 20,179 | 1.6419% | 
| 1925 | 760 | 76 | 0.0066% | 6 | 22,248 | 1.7624% | 
| 1924 | 805 | 71 | 0.0061% | 6 | 23,594 | 1.8209% | 
| 1923 | 859 | 63 | 0.0056% | 6 | 23,642 | 1.8881% | 
| 1922 | 786 | 73 | 0.0065% | 5 | 23,622 | 1.8941% | 
| 1921 | 927 | 58 | 0.0051% | 5 | 25,775 | 2.0158% | 
| 1920 | 946 | 54 | 0.0049% | 5 | 26,082 | 2.0975% | 
| 1919 | 826 | 63 | 0.0062% | 5 | 24,567 | 2.0917% | 
| 1918 | 987 | 47 | 0.0045% | 5 | 25,552 | 2.1251% | 
| 1917 | 901 | 51 | 0.0053% | 5 | 23,549 | 2.0968% | 
| 1916 | 853 | 55 | 0.0060% | 5 | 23,175 | 2.1360% | 
| 1915 | 938 | 45 | 0.0051% | 5 | 21,867 | 2.1373% | 
| 1914 | 792 | 45 | 0.0066% | 5 | 15,808 | 1.9890% | 
| 1913 | 850 | 33 | 0.0062% | 5 | 12,568 | 1.9246% | 
| 1912 | 648 | 43 | 0.0095% | 5 | 11,235 | 1.9200% | 
| 1911 | 594 | 27 | 0.0112% | 5 | 7,976 | 1.8109% | 
| 1910 | 468 | 35 | 0.0168% | 5 | 7,200 | 1.7202% | 
| 1909 | 670 | 17 | 0.0096% | 4 | 6,499 | 1.7689% | 
| 1908 | 608 | 19 | 0.0114% | 4 | 6,172 | 1.7433% | 
| 1907 | 694 | 15 | 0.0095% | 5 | 5,567 | 1.6511% | 
| 1906 | 560 | 18 | 0.0125% | 5 | 5,137 | 1.6400% | 
| 1905 | 522 | 20 | 0.0140% | 5 | 5,065 | 1.6350% | 
| 1904 | 608 | 15 | 0.0108% | 5 | 4,900 | 1.6757% | 
| 1903 | 651 | 13 | 0.0100% | 5 | 4,521 | 1.6254% | 
| 1902 | 533 | 17 | 0.0128% | 5 | 4,383 | 1.5636% | 
| 1901 | 528 | 15 | 0.0130% | 5 | 3,974 | 1.5632% | 
| 1900 | 645 | 16 | 0.0098% | 5 | 4,765 | 1.4981% | 
| 1899 | 771 | 9 | 0.0078% | 5 | 3,911 | 1.5802% | 
| 1898 | 568 | 15 | 0.0114% | 5 | 4,249 | 1.5498% | 
| 1897 | 435 | 20 | 0.0164% | 5 | 3,877 | 1.5616% | 
| 1896 | 667 | 12 | 0.0093% | 5 | 3,905 | 1.5495% | 
| 1895 | 968 | 7 | 0.0055% | 6 | 3,551 | 1.4370% | 
| 1894 | 535 | 15 | 0.0120% | 6 | 3,372 | 1.4289% | 
| 1893 | 607 | 12 | 0.0099% | 3 | 3,658 | 1.6240% | 
| 1892 | 632 | 12 | 0.0091% | 5 | 3,291 | 1.4631% | 
| 1891 | * | * | * | 19 | 1,858 | 0.9451% | 
| 1890 | * | * | * | 46 | 1,195 | 0.5925% | 
| 1889 | * | * | * | 46 | 1,074 | 0.5676% | 
| 1888 | * | * | * | 59 | 850 | 0.4486% | 
| 1887 | * | * | * | 62 | 627 | 0.4034% | 
| 1886 | * | * | * | 66 | 581 | 0.3779% | 
| 1885 | * | * | * | 70 | 507 | 0.3571% | 
| 1884 | * | * | * | 74 | 442 | 0.3212% | 
| 1883 | * | * | * | 74 | 387 | 0.3223% | 
| 1882 | * | * | * | 80 | 323 | 0.2792% | 
| 1881 | * | * | * | 84 | 277 | 0.2802% | 
| 1880 | * | * | * | 93 | 234 | 0.2397% | 
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
