Rudolph: Statistics About The Baby Name Rudolph
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1992 | 994 | 119 | 0.0057% | * | * | * |
1991 | 942 | 127 | 0.0060% | * | * | * |
1990 | 848 | 146 | 0.0068% | * | * | * |
1989 | 729 | 184 | 0.0088% | * | * | * |
1988 | 724 | 169 | 0.0085% | * | * | * |
1987 | 735 | 154 | 0.0079% | * | * | * |
1986 | 773 | 138 | 0.0072% | * | * | * |
1985 | 705 | 157 | 0.0082% | * | * | * |
1984 | 675 | 165 | 0.0088% | * | * | * |
1983 | 645 | 175 | 0.0094% | * | * | * |
1982 | 624 | 192 | 0.0102% | * | * | * |
1981 | 661 | 169 | 0.0091% | * | * | * |
1980 | 622 | 197 | 0.0106% | * | * | * |
1979 | 617 | 192 | 0.0107% | * | * | * |
1978 | 621 | 181 | 0.0106% | * | * | * |
1977 | 624 | 181 | 0.0106% | * | * | * |
1976 | 577 | 199 | 0.0122% | * | * | * |
1975 | 589 | 188 | 0.0116% | * | * | * |
1974 | 548 | 214 | 0.0131% | * | * | * |
1973 | 536 | 215 | 0.0133% | * | * | * |
1972 | 515 | 231 | 0.0138% | * | * | * |
1971 | 484 | 273 | 0.0150% | * | * | * |
1970 | 462 | 308 | 0.0162% | * | * | * |
1969 | 485 | 251 | 0.0137% | * | * | * |
1968 | 463 | 270 | 0.0152% | * | * | * |
1967 | 453 | 276 | 0.0155% | * | * | * |
1966 | 402 | 353 | 0.0194% | * | * | * |
1965 | 426 | 329 | 0.0174% | * | * | * |
1964 | 412 | 379 | 0.0187% | * | * | * |
1963 | 396 | 410 | 0.0199% | * | * | * |
1962 | 399 | 416 | 0.0198% | * | * | * |
1961 | 393 | 408 | 0.0190% | * | * | * |
1960 | 376 | 444 | 0.0205% | * | * | * |
1959 | 366 | 459 | 0.0212% | * | * | * |
1958 | 345 | 484 | 0.0225% | * | * | * |
1957 | 319 | 571 | 0.0261% | * | * | * |
1956 | 274 | 716 | 0.0334% | * | * | * |
1955 | 279 | 654 | 0.0313% | * | * | * |
1954 | 276 | 651 | 0.0315% | * | * | * |
1953 | 255 | 734 | 0.0368% | * | * | * |
1952 | 239 | 783 | 0.0397% | * | * | * |
1951 | 228 | 827 | 0.0434% | * | * | * |
1950 | 243 | 752 | 0.0414% | * | * | * |
1949 | 224 | 816 | 0.0454% | * | * | * |
1948 | 240 | 717 | 0.0403% | * | * | * |
1947 | 250 | 693 | 0.0374% | * | * | * |
1946 | 246 | 626 | 0.0381% | * | * | * |
1945 | 234 | 575 | 0.0420% | * | * | * |
1944 | 238 | 568 | 0.0410% | * | * | * |
1943 | 222 | 661 | 0.0457% | * | * | * |
1942 | 222 | 656 | 0.0466% | * | * | * |
1941 | 218 | 603 | 0.0481% | * | * | * |
1940 | 205 | 629 | 0.0530% | * | * | * |
1939 | 210 | 584 | 0.0515% | * | * | * |
1938 | 192 | 682 | 0.0601% | * | * | * |
1937 | 197 | 627 | 0.0574% | * | * | * |
1936 | 192 | 646 | 0.0608% | * | * | * |
1935 | 181 | 743 | 0.0696% | * | * | * |
1934 | 175 | 777 | 0.0733% | * | * | * |
1933 | 167 | 848 | 0.0833% | * | * | * |
1932 | 158 | 958 | 0.0893% | * | * | * |
1931 | 147 | 1,096 | 0.1027% | * | * | * |
1930 | 140 | 1,216 | 0.1079% | * | * | * |
1929 | 140 | 1,216 | 0.1100% | * | * | * |
1928 | 134 | 1,303 | 0.1144% | * | * | * |
1927 | 111 | 1,675 | 0.1444% | * | * | * |
1926 | 111 | 1,638 | 0.1432% | * | * | * |
1925 | 136 | 1,249 | 0.1086% | * | * | * |
1924 | 138 | 1,226 | 0.1049% | * | * | * |
1923 | 128 | 1,305 | 0.1152% | * | * | * |
1922 | 138 | 1,134 | 0.1007% | * | * | * |
1921 | 157 | 969 | 0.0852% | * | * | * |
1920 | 169 | 832 | 0.0756% | * | * | * |
1919 | 168 | 808 | 0.0795% | * | * | * |
1918 | 148 | 965 | 0.0919% | * | * | * |
1917 | 141 | 943 | 0.0983% | * | * | * |
1916 | 138 | 986 | 0.1068% | * | * | * |
1915 | 135 | 975 | 0.1106% | * | * | * |
1914 | 139 | 729 | 0.1067% | * | * | * |
1913 | 137 | 566 | 0.1057% | * | * | * |
1912 | 141 | 453 | 0.1004% | * | * | * |
1911 | 155 | 216 | 0.0897% | * | * | * |
1910 | 148 | 217 | 0.1042% | * | * | * |
1909 | 148 | 172 | 0.0974% | * | * | * |
1908 | 140 | 173 | 0.1040% | * | * | * |
1907 | 162 | 135 | 0.0852% | * | * | * |
1906 | 158 | 125 | 0.0868% | * | * | * |
1905 | 156 | 132 | 0.0921% | * | * | * |
1904 | 150 | 128 | 0.0924% | * | * | * |
1903 | 153 | 121 | 0.0935% | * | * | * |
1902 | 151 | 119 | 0.0896% | * | * | * |
1901 | 172 | 87 | 0.0752% | * | * | * |
1900 | 145 | 147 | 0.0904% | * | * | * |
1899 | 153 | 100 | 0.0868% | * | * | * |
1898 | 147 | 115 | 0.0870% | * | * | * |
1897 | 147 | 109 | 0.0894% | * | * | * |
1896 | 154 | 108 | 0.0837% | * | * | * |
1895 | 147 | 106 | 0.0837% | * | * | * |
1894 | 148 | 104 | 0.0833% | * | * | * |
1893 | 149 | 101 | 0.0834% | * | * | * |
1892 | 169 | 95 | 0.0723% | * | * | * |
1891 | 187 | 68 | 0.0622% | * | * | * |
1890 | 154 | 92 | 0.0768% | * | * | * |
1889 | 165 | 83 | 0.0697% | * | * | * |
1888 | 238 | 54 | 0.0416% | * | * | * |
1887 | 178 | 71 | 0.0649% | * | * | * |
1886 | 198 | 69 | 0.0580% | * | * | * |
1885 | 189 | 70 | 0.0604% | * | * | * |
1884 | 182 | 77 | 0.0627% | * | * | * |
1883 | 196 | 61 | 0.0542% | * | * | * |
1882 | 230 | 52 | 0.0426% | * | * | * |
1881 | 186 | 62 | 0.0572% | * | * | * |
1880 | 218 | 54 | 0.0456% | * | * | * |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |