Robert: Statistics About The Baby Name Robert
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
2023 | 89 | 3,807 | 0.2079% | * | * | * |
2022 | 84 | 4,051 | 0.2174% | * | * | * |
2021 | 79 | 4,402 | 0.2366% | * | * | * |
2020 | 80 | 4,376 | 0.2373% | * | * | * |
2019 | 76 | 4,813 | 0.2522% | * | * | * |
2018 | 71 | 5,140 | 0.2665% | * | * | * |
2017 | 65 | 5,507 | 0.2805% | * | * | * |
2016 | 62 | 5,977 | 0.2962% | * | * | * |
2015 | 63 | 6,076 | 0.2998% | * | * | * |
2014 | 61 | 6,572 | 0.3238% | * | * | * |
2013 | 62 | 6,641 | 0.3320% | * | * | * |
2012 | 61 | 6,875 | 0.3421% | * | * | * |
2011 | 61 | 6,904 | 0.3430% | * | * | * |
2010 | 54 | 7,471 | 0.3674% | * | * | * |
2009 | 55 | 7,714 | 0.3681% | * | * | * |
2008 | 49 | 8,693 | 0.4042% | * | * | * |
2007 | 47 | 9,228 | 0.4232% | * | * | * |
2006 | 47 | 9,716 | 0.4507% | * | * | * |
2005 | 39 | 9,953 | 0.4769% | * | * | * |
2004 | 36 | 10,485 | 0.5042% | * | * | * |
2003 | 35 | 11,287 | 0.5406% | * | * | * |
2002 | 34 | 11,969 | 0.5817% | * | * | * |
2001 | 30 | 12,612 | 0.6119% | * | * | * |
2000 | 29 | 13,683 | 0.6572% | * | * | * |
1999 | 26 | 14,503 | 0.7130% | * | * | * |
1998 | 23 | 15,504 | 0.7662% | * | * | * |
1997 | 23 | 16,285 | 0.8165% | * | * | * |
1996 | 23 | 17,661 | 0.8827% | * | * | * |
1995 | 22 | 18,563 | 0.9242% | * | * | * |
1994 | 21 | 20,541 | 1.0093% | * | * | * |
1993 | 17 | 22,428 | 1.0875% | * | * | * |
1992 | 17 | 24,082 | 1.1490% | * | * | * |
1991 | 13 | 26,829 | 1.2673% | * | * | * |
1990 | 13 | 28,833 | 1.3420% | * | * | * |
1989 | 10 | 30,072 | 1.4365% | * | * | * |
1988 | 10 | 30,280 | 1.5163% | 922 | 184 | 0.0096% |
1987 | 10 | 30,213 | 1.5519% | 799 | 219 | 0.0117% |
1986 | 9 | 31,318 | 1.6333% | 739 | 240 | 0.0130% |
1985 | 8 | 32,072 | 1.6698% | 724 | 238 | 0.0129% |
1984 | 9 | 31,727 | 1.6943% | 722 | 229 | 0.0127% |
1983 | 10 | 32,698 | 1.7582% | 674 | 255 | 0.0143% |
1982 | 9 | 34,363 | 1.8250% | 731 | 233 | 0.0129% |
1981 | 9 | 34,352 | 1.8487% | 723 | 229 | 0.0128% |
1980 | 9 | 34,204 | 1.8486% | 683 | 254 | 0.0143% |
1979 | 8 | 34,002 | 1.9017% | 684 | 250 | 0.0145% |
1978 | 8 | 33,304 | 1.9536% | 642 | 253 | 0.0154% |
1977 | 6 | 34,175 | 2.0032% | 665 | 238 | 0.0145% |
1976 | 7 | 33,773 | 2.0718% | 653 | 237 | 0.0151% |
1975 | 6 | 35,283 | 2.1783% | 636 | 244 | 0.0156% |
1974 | 7 | 36,994 | 2.2726% | 634 | 243 | 0.0155% |
1973 | 7 | 38,698 | 2.4016% | 616 | 250 | 0.0161% |
1972 | 6 | 42,976 | 2.5702% | 573 | 288 | 0.0179% |
1971 | 5 | 50,570 | 2.7872% | 582 | 299 | 0.0171% |
1970 | 5 | 57,130 | 3.0037% | 562 | 327 | 0.0179% |
1969 | 5 | 58,321 | 3.1897% | 538 | 336 | 0.0191% |
1968 | 5 | 58,157 | 3.2776% | 589 | 265 | 0.0155% |
1967 | 5 | 56,345 | 3.1688% | 594 | 257 | 0.0150% |
1966 | 5 | 59,288 | 3.2645% | 598 | 250 | 0.0142% |
1965 | 5 | 63,091 | 3.3309% | 607 | 256 | 0.0140% |
1964 | 5 | 69,933 | 3.4527% | 595 | 279 | 0.0143% |
1963 | 5 | 70,001 | 3.3914% | 637 | 251 | 0.0126% |
1962 | 5 | 70,177 | 3.3412% | 669 | 233 | 0.0115% |
1961 | 5 | 72,830 | 3.3838% | 592 | 289 | 0.0139% |
1960 | 5 | 72,316 | 3.3405% | 613 | 268 | 0.0129% |
1959 | 5 | 74,465 | 3.4398% | 651 | 238 | 0.0115% |
1958 | 4 | 77,197 | 3.5904% | 648 | 232 | 0.0112% |
1957 | 4 | 81,605 | 3.7344% | 609 | 259 | 0.0124% |
1956 | 3 | 83,826 | 3.9134% | 660 | 210 | 0.0102% |
1955 | 4 | 83,618 | 4.0081% | 603 | 236 | 0.0118% |
1954 | 3 | 86,206 | 4.1722% | 670 | 193 | 0.0097% |
1953 | 1 | 85,948 | 4.3043% | 591 | 226 | 0.0117% |
1952 | 2 | 86,541 | 4.3862% | 640 | 193 | 0.0101% |
1951 | 2 | 86,049 | 4.5207% | 598 | 208 | 0.0113% |
1950 | 2 | 83,499 | 4.5924% | 593 | 204 | 0.0116% |
1949 | 2 | 83,660 | 4.6571% | 587 | 199 | 0.0113% |
1948 | 2 | 85,258 | 4.7958% | 587 | 203 | 0.0117% |
1947 | 2 | 91,358 | 4.9339% | 551 | 237 | 0.0131% |
1946 | 2 | 83,781 | 5.0966% | 538 | 216 | 0.0134% |
1945 | 2 | 69,908 | 5.1041% | 515 | 200 | 0.0149% |
1944 | 2 | 70,572 | 5.0976% | 521 | 194 | 0.0142% |
1943 | 2 | 74,522 | 5.1484% | 470 | 246 | 0.0172% |
1942 | 2 | 71,825 | 5.0983% | 513 | 211 | 0.0152% |
1941 | 2 | 64,150 | 5.1215% | 499 | 195 | 0.0157% |
1940 | 2 | 61,149 | 5.1562% | 467 | 206 | 0.0174% |
1939 | 2 | 59,675 | 5.2636% | 465 | 209 | 0.0184% |
1938 | 1 | 62,231 | 5.4799% | 456 | 218 | 0.0191% |
1937 | 1 | 61,766 | 5.6549% | 441 | 223 | 0.0202% |
1936 | 1 | 58,434 | 5.4965% | 434 | 221 | 0.0205% |
1935 | 1 | 56,443 | 5.2845% | 426 | 231 | 0.0213% |
1934 | 1 | 55,771 | 5.2589% | 398 | 265 | 0.0245% |
1933 | 1 | 54,113 | 5.3151% | 389 | 274 | 0.0262% |
1932 | 1 | 59,177 | 5.5163% | 352 | 325 | 0.0294% |
1931 | 1 | 60,374 | 5.6583% | 345 | 344 | 0.0312% |
1930 | 1 | 62,037 | 5.5036% | 321 | 421 | 0.0361% |
1929 | 1 | 59,744 | 5.4038% | 314 | 438 | 0.0379% |
1928 | 1 | 60,595 | 5.3182% | 313 | 438 | 0.0367% |
1927 | 1 | 61,528 | 5.3047% | 332 | 410 | 0.0332% |
1926 | 1 | 61,122 | 5.3420% | 347 | 370 | 0.0301% |
1925 | 1 | 60,824 | 5.2890% | 363 | 352 | 0.0279% |
1924 | 1 | 60,811 | 5.2047% | 400 | 295 | 0.0228% |
1923 | 2 | 56,150 | 4.9585% | 424 | 252 | 0.0201% |
1922 | 2 | 53,840 | 4.7828% | 434 | 238 | 0.0191% |
1921 | 2 | 52,759 | 4.6393% | 437 | 245 | 0.0192% |
1920 | 3 | 48,691 | 4.4236% | 481 | 203 | 0.0163% |
1919 | 4 | 41,057 | 4.0416% | 497 | 183 | 0.0156% |
1918 | 4 | 40,671 | 3.8728% | 519 | 178 | 0.0148% |
1917 | 4 | 35,232 | 3.6726% | 516 | 168 | 0.0150% |
1916 | 4 | 31,737 | 3.4368% | 614 | 122 | 0.0112% |
1915 | 4 | 28,759 | 3.2631% | 609 | 116 | 0.0113% |
1914 | 4 | 21,192 | 3.1029% | 654 | 79 | 0.0099% |
1913 | 4 | 15,680 | 2.9271% | 612 | 72 | 0.0110% |
1912 | 4 | 12,820 | 2.8427% | 617 | 64 | 0.0109% |
1911 | 5 | 6,506 | 2.7011% | 701 | 39 | 0.0089% |
1910 | 4 | 5,601 | 2.6905% | 808 | 29 | 0.0069% |
1909 | 5 | 4,560 | 2.5820% | 829 | 25 | 0.0068% |
1908 | 5 | 4,220 | 2.5381% | 765 | 26 | 0.0073% |
1907 | 5 | 4,022 | 2.5373% | 789 | 23 | 0.0068% |
1906 | 5 | 3,636 | 2.5241% | 954 | 16 | 0.0051% |
1905 | 6 | 3,412 | 2.3817% | 819 | 21 | 0.0068% |
1904 | 5 | 3,417 | 2.4670% | * | * | * |
1903 | 7 | 3,045 | 2.3540% | * | * | * |
1902 | 6 | 3,181 | 2.3957% | 770 | 21 | 0.0075% |
1901 | 7 | 2,544 | 2.2000% | 850 | 16 | 0.0063% |
1900 | 6 | 3,842 | 2.3636% | 757 | 24 | 0.0075% |
1899 | 7 | 2,613 | 2.2678% | 784 | 18 | 0.0073% |
1898 | 7 | 2,937 | 2.2225% | * | * | * |
1897 | 8 | 2,703 | 2.2159% | 759 | 18 | 0.0073% |
1896 | 8 | 2,719 | 2.1060% | 592 | 28 | 0.0111% |
1895 | 8 | 2,637 | 2.0817% | 722 | 20 | 0.0081% |
1894 | 8 | 2,497 | 1.9988% | 660 | 21 | 0.0089% |
1893 | 8 | 2,563 | 2.1169% | 734 | 17 | 0.0075% |
1892 | 8 | 2,713 | 2.0634% | 720 | 17 | 0.0076% |
1891 | 8 | 2,240 | 2.0498% | 993 | 9 | 0.0046% |
1890 | 8 | 2,542 | 2.1233% | 818 | 12 | 0.0060% |
1889 | 9 | 2,515 | 2.1123% | 714 | 14 | 0.0074% |
1888 | 8 | 2,814 | 2.1659% | 591 | 19 | 0.0100% |
1887 | 11 | 2,124 | 1.9428% | 928 | 8 | 0.0051% |
1886 | 8 | 2,445 | 2.0537% | 568 | 16 | 0.0104% |
1885 | 9 | 2,321 | 2.0017% | 692 | 11 | 0.0077% |
1884 | 10 | 2,469 | 2.0114% | 911 | 7 | 0.0051% |
1883 | 9 | 2,334 | 2.0748% | 608 | 11 | 0.0092% |
1882 | 10 | 2,501 | 2.0491% | 557 | 12 | 0.0104% |
1881 | 11 | 2,141 | 1.9767% | 618 | 9 | 0.0091% |
1880 | 10 | 2,416 | 2.0402% | 539 | 11 | 0.0113% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |