
Rita: Statistics About The Baby Name Rita
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls | 
| 2002 | * | * | * | 926 | 241 | 0.0123% | 
| 2001 | * | * | * | 846 | 270 | 0.0137% | 
| 2000 | * | * | * | 882 | 250 | 0.0126% | 
| 1999 | * | * | * | 929 | 227 | 0.0117% | 
| 1998 | * | * | * | 865 | 244 | 0.0126% | 
| 1997 | * | * | * | 849 | 241 | 0.0126% | 
| 1996 | * | * | * | 704 | 303 | 0.0158% | 
| 1995 | * | * | * | 706 | 297 | 0.0155% | 
| 1994 | * | * | * | 670 | 318 | 0.0163% | 
| 1993 | * | * | * | 653 | 340 | 0.0173% | 
| 1992 | * | * | * | 588 | 391 | 0.0195% | 
| 1991 | * | * | * | 554 | 424 | 0.0209% | 
| 1990 | * | * | * | 547 | 432 | 0.0211% | 
| 1989 | * | * | * | 549 | 412 | 0.0207% | 
| 1988 | * | * | * | 465 | 482 | 0.0251% | 
| 1987 | * | * | * | 433 | 514 | 0.0275% | 
| 1986 | * | * | * | 408 | 542 | 0.0294% | 
| 1985 | * | * | * | 385 | 591 | 0.0321% | 
| 1984 | * | * | * | 378 | 599 | 0.0333% | 
| 1983 | * | * | * | 376 | 591 | 0.0331% | 
| 1982 | * | * | * | 339 | 707 | 0.0390% | 
| 1981 | * | * | * | 284 | 855 | 0.0479% | 
| 1980 | * | * | * | 300 | 832 | 0.0468% | 
| 1979 | * | * | * | 277 | 882 | 0.0512% | 
| 1978 | * | * | * | 264 | 887 | 0.0540% | 
| 1977 | * | * | * | 295 | 800 | 0.0487% | 
| 1976 | * | * | * | 271 | 860 | 0.0548% | 
| 1975 | * | * | * | 275 | 880 | 0.0564% | 
| 1974 | * | * | * | 256 | 990 | 0.0633% | 
| 1973 | * | * | * | 248 | 1,032 | 0.0664% | 
| 1972 | * | * | * | 230 | 1,201 | 0.0745% | 
| 1971 | * | * | * | 215 | 1,417 | 0.0809% | 
| 1970 | * | * | * | 204 | 1,584 | 0.0865% | 
| 1969 | * | * | * | 184 | 1,736 | 0.0985% | 
| 1968 | * | * | * | 158 | 2,079 | 0.1217% | 
| 1967 | * | * | * | 146 | 2,375 | 0.1384% | 
| 1966 | * | * | * | 135 | 2,690 | 0.1533% | 
| 1965 | * | * | * | 126 | 3,062 | 0.1676% | 
| 1964 | * | * | * | 122 | 3,465 | 0.1771% | 
| 1963 | * | * | * | 115 | 3,806 | 0.1915% | 
| 1962 | * | * | * | 110 | 4,098 | 0.2022% | 
| 1961 | * | * | * | 105 | 4,525 | 0.2181% | 
| 1960 | * | * | * | 96 | 5,028 | 0.2418% | 
| 1959 | * | * | * | 98 | 4,950 | 0.2382% | 
| 1958 | * | * | * | 88 | 5,328 | 0.2582% | 
| 1957 | * | * | * | 78 | 6,016 | 0.2869% | 
| 1956 | * | * | * | 79 | 6,056 | 0.2942% | 
| 1955 | * | * | * | 72 | 6,086 | 0.3038% | 
| 1954 | * | * | * | 67 | 6,532 | 0.3282% | 
| 1953 | * | * | * | 64 | 6,282 | 0.3259% | 
| 1952 | * | * | * | 66 | 6,144 | 0.3230% | 
| 1951 | * | * | * | 61 | 6,408 | 0.3476% | 
| 1950 | * | * | * | 56 | 6,426 | 0.3655% | 
| 1949 | * | * | * | 54 | 6,645 | 0.3788% | 
| 1948 | * | * | * | 59 | 5,830 | 0.3348% | 
| 1947 | * | * | * | 60 | 5,984 | 0.3295% | 
| 1946 | * | * | * | 56 | 5,534 | 0.3438% | 
| 1945 | * | * | * | 59 | 4,273 | 0.3175% | 
| 1944 | * | * | * | 54 | 4,526 | 0.3315% | 
| 1943 | * | * | * | 52 | 5,000 | 0.3492% | 
| 1942 | * | * | * | 55 | 4,711 | 0.3385% | 
| 1941 | * | * | * | 63 | 3,876 | 0.3114% | 
| 1940 | * | * | * | 70 | 3,441 | 0.2913% | 
| 1939 | * | * | * | 78 | 3,183 | 0.2807% | 
| 1938 | * | * | * | 74 | 3,359 | 0.2944% | 
| 1937 | * | * | * | 69 | 3,425 | 0.3110% | 
| 1936 | * | * | * | 69 | 3,331 | 0.3093% | 
| 1935 | * | * | * | 63 | 3,575 | 0.3291% | 
| 1934 | * | * | * | 63 | 3,685 | 0.3407% | 
| 1933 | * | * | * | 53 | 3,836 | 0.3670% | 
| 1932 | * | * | * | 52 | 4,258 | 0.3850% | 
| 1931 | * | * | * | 48 | 4,608 | 0.4180% | 
| 1930 | * | * | * | 42 | 5,465 | 0.4689% | 
| 1929 | * | * | * | 52 | 4,759 | 0.4113% | 
| 1928 | * | * | * | 57 | 4,807 | 0.4025% | 
| 1927 | * | * | * | 54 | 5,074 | 0.4106% | 
| 1926 | * | * | * | 50 | 5,012 | 0.4078% | 
| 1925 | * | * | * | 48 | 5,329 | 0.4221% | 
| 1924 | * | * | * | 49 | 5,376 | 0.4149% | 
| 1923 | * | * | * | 50 | 5,090 | 0.4065% | 
| 1922 | * | * | * | 51 | 4,976 | 0.3990% | 
| 1921 | * | * | * | 48 | 5,158 | 0.4034% | 
| 1920 | * | * | * | 52 | 4,971 | 0.3998% | 
| 1919 | * | * | * | 54 | 4,516 | 0.3845% | 
| 1918 | * | * | * | 57 | 4,446 | 0.3698% | 
| 1917 | * | * | * | 63 | 3,865 | 0.3441% | 
| 1916 | * | * | * | 67 | 3,472 | 0.3200% | 
| 1915 | * | * | * | 71 | 3,058 | 0.2989% | 
| 1914 | * | * | * | 88 | 2,008 | 0.2527% | 
| 1913 | * | * | * | 116 | 1,091 | 0.1671% | 
| 1912 | * | * | * | 165 | 632 | 0.1080% | 
| 1911 | * | * | * | 179 | 402 | 0.0913% | 
| 1910 | * | * | * | 198 | 333 | 0.0796% | 
| 1909 | * | * | * | 198 | 294 | 0.0800% | 
| 1908 | * | * | * | 212 | 254 | 0.0717% | 
| 1907 | * | * | * | 197 | 265 | 0.0786% | 
| 1906 | * | * | * | 219 | 203 | 0.0648% | 
| 1905 | * | * | * | 229 | 188 | 0.0607% | 
| 1904 | * | * | * | 242 | 166 | 0.0568% | 
| 1903 | * | * | * | 228 | 174 | 0.0626% | 
| 1902 | * | * | * | 257 | 148 | 0.0528% | 
| 1901 | * | * | * | 250 | 135 | 0.0531% | 
| 1900 | * | * | * | 255 | 163 | 0.0512% | 
| 1899 | * | * | * | 228 | 147 | 0.0594% | 
| 1898 | * | * | * | 244 | 147 | 0.0536% | 
| 1897 | * | * | * | 264 | 117 | 0.0471% | 
| 1896 | * | * | * | 275 | 109 | 0.0433% | 
| 1895 | * | * | * | 275 | 105 | 0.0425% | 
| 1894 | * | * | * | 273 | 104 | 0.0441% | 
| 1893 | * | * | * | 275 | 95 | 0.0422% | 
| 1892 | * | * | * | 291 | 87 | 0.0387% | 
| 1891 | * | * | * | 314 | 65 | 0.0331% | 
| 1890 | * | * | * | 349 | 54 | 0.0268% | 
| 1889 | * | * | * | 276 | 75 | 0.0396% | 
| 1888 | * | * | * | 335 | 52 | 0.0274% | 
| 1887 | * | * | * | 343 | 40 | 0.0257% | 
| 1886 | * | * | * | 414 | 28 | 0.0182% | 
| 1885 | * | * | * | 372 | 31 | 0.0218% | 
| 1884 | * | * | * | 414 | 24 | 0.0174% | 
| 1883 | * | * | * | 514 | 15 | 0.0125% | 
| 1882 | * | * | * | 402 | 21 | 0.0181% | 
| 1881 | * | * | * | 382 | 20 | 0.0202% | 
| 1880 | * | * | * | 385 | 19 | 0.0195% | 
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
