Raymundo: Statistics About The Baby Name Raymundo
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
2004 | 967 | 171 | 0.0082% | * | * | * |
2003 | 859 | 200 | 0.0096% | * | * | * |
2002 | 910 | 176 | 0.0086% | * | * | * |
2001 | 852 | 188 | 0.0091% | * | * | * |
2000 | 813 | 198 | 0.0095% | * | * | * |
1999 | 786 | 195 | 0.0096% | * | * | * |
1998 | 816 | 184 | 0.0091% | * | * | * |
1997 | 779 | 190 | 0.0095% | * | * | * |
1996 | 705 | 224 | 0.0112% | * | * | * |
1995 | 759 | 202 | 0.0101% | * | * | * |
1994 | 676 | 235 | 0.0115% | * | * | * |
1993 | 832 | 161 | 0.0078% | * | * | * |
1992 | 800 | 170 | 0.0081% | * | * | * |
1991 | 865 | 148 | 0.0070% | * | * | * |
1990 | 826 | 153 | 0.0071% | * | * | * |
1989 | 919 | 122 | 0.0058% | * | * | * |
1988 | 926 | 107 | 0.0054% | * | * | * |
1987 | 783 | 139 | 0.0071% | * | * | * |
1986 | 876 | 107 | 0.0056% | * | * | * |
1985 | 781 | 129 | 0.0067% | * | * | * |
1984 | 835 | 110 | 0.0059% | * | * | * |
1983 | 779 | 125 | 0.0067% | * | * | * |
1982 | 812 | 119 | 0.0063% | * | * | * |
1981 | 722 | 143 | 0.0077% | * | * | * |
1980 | 788 | 124 | 0.0067% | * | * | * |
1979 | 836 | 108 | 0.0060% | * | * | * |
1978 | 893 | 93 | 0.0055% | * | * | * |
1977 | 792 | 116 | 0.0068% | * | * | * |
1976 | 805 | 107 | 0.0066% | * | * | * |
1975 | 855 | 95 | 0.0059% | * | * | * |
1974 | 803 | 100 | 0.0061% | * | * | * |
1973 | 814 | 95 | 0.0059% | * | * | * |
1972 | 777 | 106 | 0.0063% | * | * | * |
1971 | 872 | 87 | 0.0048% | * | * | * |
1970 | 891 | 82 | 0.0043% | * | * | * |
1969 | 871 | 78 | 0.0043% | * | * | * |
1968 | 815 | 83 | 0.0047% | * | * | * |
1967 | 804 | 82 | 0.0046% | * | * | * |
1966 | 979 | 56 | 0.0031% | * | * | * |
1965 | 835 | 78 | 0.0041% | * | * | * |
1964 | 891 | 74 | 0.0037% | * | * | * |
1963 | 886 | 72 | 0.0035% | * | * | * |
1962 | 874 | 76 | 0.0036% | * | * | * |
1961 | 873 | 77 | 0.0036% | * | * | * |
1960 | 934 | 66 | 0.0030% | * | * | * |
1957 | 902 | 71 | 0.0032% | * | * | * |
1955 | 919 | 66 | 0.0032% | * | * | * |
1954 | 982 | 58 | 0.0028% | * | * | * |
1953 | 996 | 53 | 0.0027% | * | * | * |
1952 | 953 | 57 | 0.0029% | * | * | * |
1951 | 838 | 70 | 0.0037% | * | * | * |
1950 | 873 | 62 | 0.0034% | * | * | * |
1949 | 998 | 49 | 0.0027% | * | * | * |
1948 | 847 | 65 | 0.0037% | * | * | * |
1947 | 915 | 59 | 0.0032% | * | * | * |
1946 | 927 | 52 | 0.0032% | * | * | * |
1945 | 898 | 51 | 0.0037% | * | * | * |
1944 | 968 | 45 | 0.0033% | * | * | * |
1937 | 904 | 48 | 0.0044% | * | * | * |
1931 | 990 | 45 | 0.0042% | * | * | * |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |