
Raleigh: Statistics About The Baby Name Raleigh
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
| 1968 | 989 | 56 | 0.0032% | * | * | * |
| 1965 | 871 | 72 | 0.0038% | * | * | * |
| 1962 | 894 | 73 | 0.0035% | * | * | * |
| 1961 | 910 | 71 | 0.0033% | * | * | * |
| 1959 | 882 | 76 | 0.0035% | * | * | * |
| 1958 | 801 | 88 | 0.0041% | * | * | * |
| 1957 | 877 | 75 | 0.0034% | * | * | * |
| 1956 | 819 | 83 | 0.0039% | * | * | * |
| 1955 | 846 | 76 | 0.0036% | * | * | * |
| 1954 | 771 | 86 | 0.0042% | * | * | * |
| 1953 | 769 | 85 | 0.0043% | * | * | * |
| 1952 | 710 | 98 | 0.0050% | * | * | * |
| 1951 | 720 | 93 | 0.0049% | * | * | * |
| 1950 | 706 | 95 | 0.0052% | * | * | * |
| 1949 | 711 | 94 | 0.0052% | * | * | * |
| 1948 | 679 | 99 | 0.0056% | * | * | * |
| 1947 | 655 | 111 | 0.0060% | * | * | * |
| 1946 | 653 | 98 | 0.0060% | * | * | * |
| 1945 | 596 | 103 | 0.0075% | * | * | * |
| 1944 | 617 | 99 | 0.0072% | * | * | * |
| 1943 | 613 | 106 | 0.0073% | * | * | * |
| 1942 | 548 | 126 | 0.0089% | * | * | * |
| 1941 | 638 | 92 | 0.0073% | * | * | * |
| 1940 | 629 | 90 | 0.0076% | * | * | * |
| 1939 | 602 | 94 | 0.0083% | * | * | * |
| 1938 | 620 | 92 | 0.0081% | * | * | * |
| 1937 | 651 | 83 | 0.0076% | * | * | * |
| 1936 | 669 | 79 | 0.0074% | * | * | * |
| 1935 | 601 | 94 | 0.0088% | * | * | * |
| 1934 | 569 | 108 | 0.0102% | * | * | * |
| 1933 | 591 | 97 | 0.0095% | * | * | * |
| 1932 | 686 | 81 | 0.0076% | * | * | * |
| 1931 | 607 | 96 | 0.0090% | * | * | * |
| 1930 | 650 | 90 | 0.0080% | * | * | * |
| 1929 | 642 | 92 | 0.0083% | * | * | * |
| 1928 | 650 | 93 | 0.0082% | * | * | * |
| 1927 | 555 | 124 | 0.0107% | * | * | * |
| 1926 | 617 | 104 | 0.0091% | * | * | * |
| 1925 | 637 | 100 | 0.0087% | * | * | * |
| 1924 | 542 | 137 | 0.0117% | * | * | * |
| 1923 | 594 | 113 | 0.0100% | * | * | * |
| 1922 | 549 | 132 | 0.0117% | * | * | * |
| 1921 | 533 | 137 | 0.0120% | * | * | * |
| 1920 | 529 | 134 | 0.0122% | * | * | * |
| 1919 | 616 | 97 | 0.0095% | * | * | * |
| 1918 | 565 | 116 | 0.0110% | * | * | * |
| 1917 | 542 | 116 | 0.0121% | * | * | * |
| 1916 | 571 | 102 | 0.0110% | * | * | * |
| 1915 | 500 | 124 | 0.0141% | * | * | * |
| 1914 | 496 | 98 | 0.0143% | * | * | * |
| 1913 | 516 | 70 | 0.0131% | * | * | * |
| 1912 | 480 | 68 | 0.0151% | * | * | * |
| 1911 | 522 | 33 | 0.0137% | * | * | * |
| 1910 | 629 | 22 | 0.0106% | * | * | * |
| 1909 | 468 | 30 | 0.0170% | * | * | * |
| 1908 | 607 | 19 | 0.0114% | * | * | * |
| 1907 | 468 | 25 | 0.0158% | * | * | * |
| 1906 | 636 | 15 | 0.0104% | * | * | * |
| 1905 | 378 | 31 | 0.0216% | * | * | * |
| 1904 | 488 | 20 | 0.0144% | * | * | * |
| 1903 | 518 | 18 | 0.0139% | * | * | * |
| 1902 | 412 | 25 | 0.0188% | * | * | * |
| 1901 | 449 | 19 | 0.0164% | * | * | * |
| 1900 | 411 | 31 | 0.0191% | * | * | * |
| 1899 | 543 | 14 | 0.0122% | * | * | * |
| 1898 | 517 | 17 | 0.0129% | * | * | * |
| 1897 | 407 | 22 | 0.0180% | * | * | * |
| 1896 | 515 | 17 | 0.0132% | * | * | * |
| 1895 | 522 | 16 | 0.0126% | * | * | * |
| 1894 | 459 | 19 | 0.0152% | * | * | * |
| 1893 | 445 | 18 | 0.0149% | * | * | * |
| 1892 | 441 | 20 | 0.0152% | * | * | * |
| 1891 | 357 | 24 | 0.0220% | * | * | * |
| 1890 | 431 | 18 | 0.0150% | * | * | * |
| 1889 | 402 | 21 | 0.0176% | * | * | * |
| 1888 | 687 | 10 | 0.0077% | * | * | * |
| 1887 | 453 | 15 | 0.0137% | * | * | * |
| 1886 | 366 | 23 | 0.0193% | * | * | * |
| 1885 | 383 | 22 | 0.0190% | * | * | * |
| 1884 | 412 | 20 | 0.0163% | * | * | * |
| 1883 | 445 | 17 | 0.0151% | * | * | * |
| 1882 | 484 | 15 | 0.0123% | * | * | * |
| 1881 | 557 | 11 | 0.0102% | * | * | * |
| 1880 | 499 | 14 | 0.0118% | * | * | * |
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
