Phyllis: Statistics About The Baby Name Phyllis
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1984 | * | * | * | 957 | 151 | 0.0084% |
1983 | * | * | * | 882 | 173 | 0.0097% |
1982 | * | * | * | 871 | 177 | 0.0098% |
1981 | * | * | * | 852 | 183 | 0.0102% |
1980 | * | * | * | 854 | 181 | 0.0102% |
1979 | * | * | * | 790 | 201 | 0.0117% |
1978 | * | * | * | 714 | 222 | 0.0135% |
1977 | * | * | * | 666 | 237 | 0.0144% |
1976 | * | * | * | 639 | 242 | 0.0154% |
1975 | * | * | * | 531 | 325 | 0.0208% |
1974 | * | * | * | 548 | 309 | 0.0197% |
1973 | * | * | * | 454 | 406 | 0.0261% |
1972 | * | * | * | 398 | 507 | 0.0315% |
1971 | * | * | * | 374 | 629 | 0.0359% |
1970 | * | * | * | 342 | 765 | 0.0418% |
1969 | * | * | * | 301 | 905 | 0.0514% |
1968 | * | * | * | 250 | 1,089 | 0.0637% |
1967 | * | * | * | 215 | 1,396 | 0.0813% |
1966 | * | * | * | 173 | 1,940 | 0.1105% |
1965 | * | * | * | 154 | 2,471 | 0.1353% |
1964 | * | * | * | 140 | 2,890 | 0.1477% |
1963 | * | * | * | 130 | 3,251 | 0.1636% |
1962 | * | * | * | 129 | 3,491 | 0.1723% |
1961 | * | * | * | 120 | 3,836 | 0.1849% |
1960 | * | * | * | 108 | 4,437 | 0.2134% |
1959 | * | * | * | 103 | 4,684 | 0.2254% |
1958 | * | * | * | 94 | 5,072 | 0.2458% |
1957 | * | * | * | 90 | 5,306 | 0.2531% |
1956 | * | * | * | 82 | 5,653 | 0.2746% |
1955 | * | * | * | 75 | 5,685 | 0.2837% |
1954 | * | * | * | 75 | 5,766 | 0.2897% |
1953 | * | * | * | 69 | 5,940 | 0.3082% |
1952 | * | * | * | 65 | 6,154 | 0.3235% |
1951 | * | * | * | 57 | 6,782 | 0.3679% |
1950 | * | * | * | 53 | 6,688 | 0.3804% |
1949 | * | * | * | 50 | 7,318 | 0.4172% |
1948 | * | * | * | 46 | 7,864 | 0.4517% |
1947 | * | * | * | 37 | 9,178 | 0.5054% |
1946 | * | * | * | 41 | 8,036 | 0.4992% |
1945 | * | * | * | 40 | 6,525 | 0.4848% |
1944 | * | * | * | 40 | 7,012 | 0.5137% |
1943 | * | * | * | 39 | 7,596 | 0.5305% |
1942 | * | * | * | 37 | 7,796 | 0.5602% |
1941 | * | * | * | 35 | 7,341 | 0.5898% |
1940 | * | * | * | 33 | 7,414 | 0.6277% |
1939 | * | * | * | 30 | 7,596 | 0.6698% |
1938 | * | * | * | 28 | 7,639 | 0.6695% |
1937 | * | * | * | 27 | 7,245 | 0.6579% |
1936 | * | * | * | 25 | 7,369 | 0.6842% |
1935 | * | * | * | 26 | 7,363 | 0.6779% |
1934 | * | * | * | 28 | 7,174 | 0.6632% |
1933 | * | * | * | 28 | 7,103 | 0.6796% |
1932 | * | * | * | 30 | 7,301 | 0.6602% |
1931 | * | * | * | 29 | 7,209 | 0.6539% |
1930 | * | * | * | 28 | 7,762 | 0.6660% |
1929 | * | * | * | 24 | 7,991 | 0.6907% |
1928 | * | * | * | 26 | 7,918 | 0.6630% |
1927 | * | * | * | 29 | 7,422 | 0.6006% |
1926 | * | * | * | 33 | 6,909 | 0.5621% |
1925 | * | * | * | 40 | 6,484 | 0.5136% |
1924 | * | * | * | 44 | 6,261 | 0.4832% |
1923 | * | * | * | 45 | 5,487 | 0.4382% |
1922 | * | * | * | 53 | 4,933 | 0.3955% |
1921 | * | * | * | 60 | 4,585 | 0.3586% |
1920 | * | * | * | 72 | 3,852 | 0.3098% |
1919 | * | * | * | 84 | 3,187 | 0.2713% |
1918 | * | * | * | 80 | 3,329 | 0.2769% |
1917 | * | * | * | 92 | 2,696 | 0.2401% |
1916 | * | * | * | 96 | 2,424 | 0.2234% |
1915 | * | * | * | 99 | 2,092 | 0.2045% |
1914 | * | * | * | 113 | 1,406 | 0.1769% |
1913 | * | * | * | 123 | 1,051 | 0.1609% |
1912 | * | * | * | 140 | 776 | 0.1326% |
1911 | * | * | * | 155 | 525 | 0.1192% |
1910 | * | * | * | 175 | 390 | 0.0932% |
1909 | * | * | * | 172 | 351 | 0.0955% |
1908 | * | * | * | 194 | 288 | 0.0813% |
1907 | * | * | * | 200 | 262 | 0.0777% |
1906 | * | * | * | 225 | 195 | 0.0623% |
1905 | * | * | * | 235 | 183 | 0.0591% |
1904 | * | * | * | 229 | 181 | 0.0619% |
1903 | * | * | * | 245 | 150 | 0.0539% |
1902 | * | * | * | 237 | 164 | 0.0585% |
1901 | * | * | * | 261 | 124 | 0.0488% |
1900 | * | * | * | 292 | 127 | 0.0399% |
1899 | * | * | * | 272 | 111 | 0.0448% |
1898 | * | * | * | 299 | 108 | 0.0394% |
1897 | * | * | * | 359 | 67 | 0.0270% |
1896 | * | * | * | 350 | 69 | 0.0274% |
1895 | * | * | * | 350 | 65 | 0.0263% |
1894 | * | * | * | 375 | 56 | 0.0237% |
1893 | * | * | * | 373 | 53 | 0.0235% |
1892 | * | * | * | 495 | 31 | 0.0138% |
1891 | * | * | * | 470 | 31 | 0.0158% |
1890 | * | * | * | 391 | 42 | 0.0208% |
1889 | * | * | * | 510 | 25 | 0.0132% |
1888 | * | * | * | 466 | 29 | 0.0153% |
1887 | * | * | * | 533 | 18 | 0.0116% |
1886 | * | * | * | 506 | 20 | 0.0130% |
1885 | * | * | * | 689 | 11 | 0.0077% |
1884 | * | * | * | 538 | 16 | 0.0116% |
1883 | * | * | * | 512 | 15 | 0.0125% |
1882 | * | * | * | 725 | 8 | 0.0069% |
1881 | * | * | * | 919 | 5 | 0.0051% |
1880 | * | * | * | 820 | 6 | 0.0061% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |