Peggy: Statistics About The Baby Name Peggy
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1990 | * | * | * | 998 | 182 | 0.0089% |
1989 | * | * | * | 873 | 212 | 0.0106% |
1988 | * | * | * | 807 | 228 | 0.0119% |
1987 | * | * | * | 770 | 233 | 0.0124% |
1986 | * | * | * | 705 | 255 | 0.0138% |
1985 | * | * | * | 699 | 250 | 0.0136% |
1984 | * | * | * | 565 | 327 | 0.0182% |
1983 | * | * | * | 615 | 284 | 0.0159% |
1982 | * | * | * | 531 | 367 | 0.0203% |
1981 | * | * | * | 484 | 433 | 0.0242% |
1980 | * | * | * | 441 | 484 | 0.0272% |
1979 | * | * | * | 413 | 518 | 0.0301% |
1978 | * | * | * | 351 | 611 | 0.0372% |
1977 | * | * | * | 329 | 715 | 0.0435% |
1976 | * | * | * | 302 | 761 | 0.0485% |
1975 | * | * | * | 267 | 898 | 0.0576% |
1974 | * | * | * | 270 | 942 | 0.0602% |
1973 | * | * | * | 220 | 1,148 | 0.0739% |
1972 | * | * | * | 207 | 1,346 | 0.0835% |
1971 | * | * | * | 182 | 1,696 | 0.0969% |
1970 | * | * | * | 174 | 1,901 | 0.1038% |
1969 | * | * | * | 158 | 2,062 | 0.1170% |
1968 | * | * | * | 155 | 2,112 | 0.1236% |
1967 | * | * | * | 151 | 2,263 | 0.1319% |
1966 | * | * | * | 139 | 2,652 | 0.1511% |
1965 | * | * | * | 123 | 3,109 | 0.1702% |
1964 | * | * | * | 106 | 3,849 | 0.1967% |
1963 | * | * | * | 105 | 4,106 | 0.2066% |
1962 | * | * | * | 93 | 4,897 | 0.2417% |
1961 | * | * | * | 88 | 5,568 | 0.2684% |
1960 | * | * | * | 69 | 6,436 | 0.3095% |
1959 | * | * | * | 57 | 7,402 | 0.3562% |
1958 | * | * | * | 42 | 10,076 | 0.4882% |
1957 | * | * | * | 62 | 7,374 | 0.3517% |
1956 | * | * | * | 63 | 7,489 | 0.3638% |
1955 | * | * | * | 51 | 7,980 | 0.3983% |
1954 | * | * | * | 48 | 8,442 | 0.4242% |
1953 | * | * | * | 44 | 8,762 | 0.4546% |
1952 | * | * | * | 43 | 8,993 | 0.4728% |
1951 | * | * | * | 40 | 9,198 | 0.4990% |
1950 | * | * | * | 41 | 8,510 | 0.4840% |
1949 | * | * | * | 38 | 9,118 | 0.5198% |
1948 | * | * | * | 38 | 9,085 | 0.5218% |
1947 | * | * | * | 42 | 8,853 | 0.4875% |
1946 | * | * | * | 43 | 7,389 | 0.4590% |
1945 | * | * | * | 45 | 5,840 | 0.4339% |
1944 | * | * | * | 45 | 6,016 | 0.4407% |
1943 | * | * | * | 41 | 6,495 | 0.4536% |
1942 | * | * | * | 42 | 6,588 | 0.4734% |
1941 | * | * | * | 39 | 6,550 | 0.5262% |
1940 | * | * | * | 37 | 6,132 | 0.5192% |
1939 | * | * | * | 34 | 6,047 | 0.5332% |
1938 | * | * | * | 35 | 6,341 | 0.5557% |
1937 | * | * | * | 31 | 6,376 | 0.5790% |
1936 | * | * | * | 35 | 6,058 | 0.5625% |
1935 | * | * | * | 36 | 5,262 | 0.4844% |
1934 | * | * | * | 36 | 6,024 | 0.5569% |
1933 | * | * | * | 36 | 5,529 | 0.5290% |
1932 | * | * | * | 39 | 5,456 | 0.4933% |
1931 | * | * | * | 42 | 5,064 | 0.4594% |
1930 | * | * | * | 67 | 4,072 | 0.3494% |
1929 | * | * | * | 70 | 3,772 | 0.3260% |
1928 | * | * | * | 76 | 3,379 | 0.2829% |
1927 | * | * | * | 94 | 2,868 | 0.2321% |
1926 | * | * | * | 104 | 2,610 | 0.2124% |
1925 | * | * | * | 117 | 2,321 | 0.1839% |
1924 | * | * | * | 133 | 2,078 | 0.1604% |
1923 | * | * | * | 155 | 1,596 | 0.1275% |
1922 | * | * | * | 172 | 1,302 | 0.1044% |
1921 | * | * | * | 195 | 1,064 | 0.0832% |
1920 | * | * | * | 218 | 875 | 0.0704% |
1919 | * | * | * | 234 | 735 | 0.0626% |
1918 | * | * | * | 234 | 736 | 0.0612% |
1917 | * | * | * | 256 | 581 | 0.0517% |
1916 | * | * | * | 258 | 554 | 0.0511% |
1915 | * | * | * | 285 | 425 | 0.0415% |
1914 | * | * | * | 269 | 373 | 0.0469% |
1913 | * | * | * | 285 | 274 | 0.0420% |
1912 | * | * | * | 289 | 252 | 0.0431% |
1911 | * | * | * | 281 | 192 | 0.0436% |
1910 | * | * | * | 272 | 204 | 0.0487% |
1909 | * | * | * | 280 | 162 | 0.0441% |
1908 | * | * | * | 289 | 150 | 0.0424% |
1907 | * | * | * | 323 | 115 | 0.0341% |
1906 | * | * | * | 280 | 141 | 0.0450% |
1905 | * | * | * | 328 | 106 | 0.0342% |
1904 | * | * | * | 307 | 111 | 0.0380% |
1903 | * | * | * | 321 | 93 | 0.0334% |
1902 | * | * | * | 353 | 82 | 0.0293% |
1901 | * | * | * | 373 | 64 | 0.0252% |
1900 | * | * | * | 380 | 78 | 0.0245% |
1899 | * | * | * | 411 | 51 | 0.0206% |
1898 | * | * | * | 408 | 58 | 0.0212% |
1897 | * | * | * | 430 | 47 | 0.0189% |
1896 | * | * | * | 433 | 45 | 0.0179% |
1895 | * | * | * | 419 | 46 | 0.0186% |
1894 | * | * | * | 502 | 33 | 0.0140% |
1893 | * | * | * | 461 | 34 | 0.0151% |
1892 | * | * | * | 561 | 25 | 0.0111% |
1891 | * | * | * | 689 | 16 | 0.0081% |
1890 | * | * | * | 557 | 23 | 0.0114% |
1889 | * | * | * | 751 | 13 | 0.0069% |
1888 | * | * | * | 716 | 14 | 0.0074% |
1887 | * | * | * | 555 | 17 | 0.0109% |
1886 | * | * | * | 598 | 15 | 0.0098% |
1885 | * | * | * | 688 | 11 | 0.0077% |
1884 | * | * | * | 780 | 9 | 0.0065% |
1883 | * | * | * | 901 | 6 | 0.0050% |
1882 | * | * | * | 881 | 6 | 0.0052% |
1880 | * | * | * | 487 | 13 | 0.0133% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |