Patsy: Statistics About The Baby Name Patsy
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1975 | * | * | * | 914 | 142 | 0.0091% |
1974 | * | * | * | 755 | 187 | 0.0119% |
1973 | * | * | * | 711 | 205 | 0.0132% |
1972 | * | * | * | 685 | 215 | 0.0133% |
1971 | * | * | * | 628 | 265 | 0.0151% |
1970 | * | * | * | 567 | 320 | 0.0175% |
1969 | * | * | * | 571 | 297 | 0.0169% |
1968 | * | * | * | 506 | 370 | 0.0217% |
1967 | * | * | * | 444 | 452 | 0.0263% |
1966 | * | * | * | 421 | 498 | 0.0284% |
1965 | * | * | * | 384 | 576 | 0.0315% |
1964 | * | * | * | 335 | 815 | 0.0417% |
1963 | * | * | * | 312 | 892 | 0.0449% |
1962 | * | * | * | 313 | 898 | 0.0443% |
1961 | * | * | * | 291 | 1,019 | 0.0491% |
1960 | * | * | * | 271 | 1,105 | 0.0531% |
1959 | * | * | * | 238 | 1,324 | 0.0637% |
1958 | * | * | * | 215 | 1,450 | 0.0703% |
1957 | * | * | * | 207 | 1,612 | 0.0769% |
1956 | * | * | * | 191 | 1,801 | 0.0875% |
1955 | * | * | * | 171 | 2,010 | 0.1003% |
1954 | * | * | * | 154 | 2,281 | 0.1146% |
1953 | * | * | * | 141 | 2,593 | 0.1345% |
1952 | * | * | * | 128 | 2,828 | 0.1487% |
1951 | * | * | * | 122 | 2,885 | 0.1565% |
1950 | * | * | * | 117 | 2,932 | 0.1668% |
1949 | 976 | 51 | 0.0028% | 106 | 3,349 | 0.1909% |
1948 | 881 | 60 | 0.0034% | 98 | 3,707 | 0.2129% |
1947 | 826 | 71 | 0.0038% | 87 | 4,337 | 0.2388% |
1946 | 961 | 49 | 0.0030% | 86 | 4,010 | 0.2491% |
1945 | 944 | 47 | 0.0034% | 84 | 3,356 | 0.2493% |
1944 | 917 | 49 | 0.0035% | 72 | 3,722 | 0.2727% |
1943 | 805 | 67 | 0.0046% | 61 | 4,336 | 0.3028% |
1942 | 777 | 69 | 0.0049% | 57 | 4,568 | 0.3282% |
1941 | 687 | 80 | 0.0064% | 52 | 4,783 | 0.3843% |
1940 | 687 | 78 | 0.0066% | 57 | 4,084 | 0.3458% |
1939 | 654 | 83 | 0.0073% | 56 | 4,109 | 0.3623% |
1938 | 619 | 92 | 0.0081% | 55 | 4,259 | 0.3732% |
1937 | 588 | 97 | 0.0089% | 54 | 4,239 | 0.3849% |
1936 | 532 | 116 | 0.0109% | 52 | 4,193 | 0.3893% |
1935 | 518 | 124 | 0.0116% | 56 | 3,800 | 0.3498% |
1934 | 520 | 126 | 0.0119% | 58 | 3,752 | 0.3468% |
1933 | 431 | 163 | 0.0160% | 65 | 3,441 | 0.3292% |
1932 | 423 | 176 | 0.0164% | 77 | 3,259 | 0.2947% |
1931 | 375 | 222 | 0.0208% | 83 | 2,862 | 0.2596% |
1930 | 392 | 215 | 0.0191% | 97 | 2,549 | 0.2187% |
1929 | 352 | 255 | 0.0231% | 118 | 2,046 | 0.1768% |
1928 | 344 | 277 | 0.0243% | 145 | 1,623 | 0.1359% |
1927 | 331 | 299 | 0.0258% | 167 | 1,304 | 0.1055% |
1926 | 358 | 266 | 0.0232% | 198 | 989 | 0.0805% |
1925 | 344 | 286 | 0.0249% | 249 | 708 | 0.0561% |
1924 | 335 | 298 | 0.0255% | 293 | 519 | 0.0401% |
1923 | 339 | 297 | 0.0262% | 364 | 334 | 0.0267% |
1922 | 332 | 307 | 0.0273% | 399 | 275 | 0.0221% |
1921 | 329 | 322 | 0.0283% | 449 | 237 | 0.0185% |
1920 | 347 | 287 | 0.0261% | 494 | 195 | 0.0157% |
1919 | 324 | 299 | 0.0294% | 526 | 169 | 0.0144% |
1918 | 343 | 280 | 0.0267% | 520 | 177 | 0.0147% |
1917 | 355 | 248 | 0.0259% | 471 | 191 | 0.0170% |
1916 | 334 | 255 | 0.0276% | 601 | 126 | 0.0116% |
1915 | 343 | 241 | 0.0273% | 580 | 126 | 0.0123% |
1914 | 358 | 173 | 0.0253% | 586 | 94 | 0.0118% |
1913 | 370 | 128 | 0.0239% | 564 | 83 | 0.0127% |
1912 | 348 | 119 | 0.0264% | 480 | 99 | 0.0169% |
1911 | 315 | 74 | 0.0307% | 505 | 68 | 0.0154% |
1910 | 565 | 26 | 0.0125% | 471 | 73 | 0.0174% |
1909 | 569 | 22 | 0.0125% | 537 | 50 | 0.0136% |
1908 | 486 | 27 | 0.0162% | 517 | 50 | 0.0141% |
1907 | 658 | 16 | 0.0101% | 585 | 40 | 0.0119% |
1906 | 906 | 9 | 0.0062% | 553 | 41 | 0.0131% |
1905 | 400 | 29 | 0.0202% | 543 | 41 | 0.0132% |
1904 | 557 | 17 | 0.0123% | 623 | 31 | 0.0106% |
1903 | 570 | 16 | 0.0124% | 785 | 20 | 0.0072% |
1902 | 781 | 10 | 0.0075% | 567 | 34 | 0.0121% |
1901 | 584 | 13 | 0.0112% | 588 | 29 | 0.0114% |
1900 | 777 | 12 | 0.0074% | 487 | 49 | 0.0154% |
1899 | * | * | * | 697 | 21 | 0.0085% |
1898 | 791 | 9 | 0.0068% | 578 | 32 | 0.0117% |
1897 | * | * | * | 673 | 22 | 0.0089% |
1896 | * | * | * | 669 | 23 | 0.0091% |
1895 | * | * | * | 698 | 21 | 0.0085% |
1894 | * | * | * | 524 | 31 | 0.0131% |
1893 | * | * | * | 624 | 22 | 0.0098% |
1892 | * | * | * | 660 | 20 | 0.0089% |
1891 | * | * | * | 570 | 22 | 0.0112% |
1890 | * | * | * | 715 | 15 | 0.0074% |
1889 | * | * | * | 508 | 25 | 0.0132% |
1888 | * | * | * | 543 | 22 | 0.0116% |
1887 | * | * | * | 507 | 20 | 0.0129% |
1886 | * | * | * | 504 | 20 | 0.0130% |
1885 | * | * | * | 466 | 21 | 0.0148% |
1884 | * | * | * | 446 | 21 | 0.0153% |
1883 | * | * | * | 433 | 20 | 0.0167% |
1882 | * | * | * | 454 | 17 | 0.0147% |
1881 | * | * | * | 498 | 12 | 0.0121% |
1880 | * | * | * | 446 | 15 | 0.0154% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |