Pat: Statistics About The Baby Name Pat
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1973 | 844 | 88 | 0.0055% | * | * | * |
1972 | 826 | 95 | 0.0057% | * | * | * |
1971 | 706 | 137 | 0.0076% | * | * | * |
1970 | 585 | 192 | 0.0101% | * | * | * |
1969 | 514 | 228 | 0.0125% | * | * | * |
1968 | 452 | 288 | 0.0162% | * | * | * |
1967 | 406 | 356 | 0.0200% | * | * | * |
1966 | 375 | 412 | 0.0227% | 996 | 106 | 0.0060% |
1965 | 332 | 518 | 0.0273% | 781 | 162 | 0.0089% |
1964 | 283 | 748 | 0.0369% | 604 | 275 | 0.0141% |
1963 | 284 | 735 | 0.0356% | 548 | 311 | 0.0156% |
1962 | 265 | 830 | 0.0395% | 438 | 485 | 0.0239% |
1961 | 258 | 927 | 0.0431% | 390 | 608 | 0.0293% |
1960 | 252 | 1,000 | 0.0462% | 350 | 755 | 0.0363% |
1959 | 259 | 949 | 0.0438% | 283 | 1,003 | 0.0483% |
1958 | 266 | 848 | 0.0394% | 274 | 1,042 | 0.0505% |
1957 | 304 | 628 | 0.0287% | 319 | 812 | 0.0387% |
1956 | 358 | 421 | 0.0197% | 439 | 437 | 0.0212% |
1955 | 398 | 332 | 0.0159% | 478 | 359 | 0.0179% |
1954 | 406 | 311 | 0.0151% | 521 | 292 | 0.0147% |
1953 | 400 | 303 | 0.0152% | 556 | 248 | 0.0129% |
1952 | 379 | 328 | 0.0166% | 488 | 298 | 0.0157% |
1951 | 385 | 310 | 0.0163% | 463 | 328 | 0.0178% |
1950 | 345 | 381 | 0.0210% | 386 | 443 | 0.0252% |
1949 | 306 | 496 | 0.0276% | 299 | 671 | 0.0383% |
1948 | 273 | 592 | 0.0333% | 207 | 1,247 | 0.0716% |
1947 | 244 | 723 | 0.0390% | 164 | 1,819 | 0.1002% |
1946 | 250 | 614 | 0.0374% | 147 | 1,873 | 0.1163% |
1945 | 263 | 495 | 0.0361% | 154 | 1,517 | 0.1127% |
1944 | 267 | 495 | 0.0358% | 154 | 1,592 | 0.1166% |
1943 | 266 | 518 | 0.0358% | 145 | 1,833 | 0.1280% |
1942 | 248 | 534 | 0.0379% | 144 | 1,825 | 0.1311% |
1941 | 241 | 529 | 0.0422% | 134 | 1,901 | 0.1527% |
1940 | 246 | 485 | 0.0409% | 134 | 1,868 | 0.1582% |
1939 | 255 | 446 | 0.0393% | 142 | 1,658 | 0.1462% |
1938 | 269 | 419 | 0.0369% | 149 | 1,533 | 0.1343% |
1937 | 241 | 482 | 0.0441% | 147 | 1,528 | 0.1387% |
1936 | 263 | 421 | 0.0396% | 152 | 1,343 | 0.1247% |
1935 | 255 | 456 | 0.0427% | 152 | 1,321 | 0.1216% |
1934 | 242 | 474 | 0.0447% | 162 | 1,203 | 0.1112% |
1933 | 271 | 378 | 0.0371% | 160 | 1,148 | 0.1098% |
1932 | 255 | 448 | 0.0418% | 177 | 1,061 | 0.0959% |
1931 | 273 | 408 | 0.0382% | 199 | 924 | 0.0838% |
1930 | 298 | 370 | 0.0328% | 227 | 735 | 0.0631% |
1929 | 292 | 366 | 0.0331% | 262 | 597 | 0.0516% |
1928 | 296 | 363 | 0.0319% | 308 | 457 | 0.0383% |
1927 | 340 | 287 | 0.0247% | 334 | 402 | 0.0325% |
1926 | 337 | 297 | 0.0260% | 366 | 339 | 0.0276% |
1925 | 339 | 292 | 0.0254% | 502 | 198 | 0.0157% |
1924 | 393 | 238 | 0.0204% | 587 | 157 | 0.0121% |
1923 | 395 | 227 | 0.0200% | 695 | 112 | 0.0089% |
1922 | 395 | 232 | 0.0206% | 751 | 95 | 0.0076% |
1921 | 405 | 223 | 0.0196% | 856 | 75 | 0.0059% |
1920 | 417 | 202 | 0.0184% | 829 | 76 | 0.0061% |
1919 | 441 | 181 | 0.0178% | 799 | 78 | 0.0066% |
1918 | 404 | 217 | 0.0207% | 860 | 70 | 0.0058% |
1917 | 414 | 185 | 0.0193% | 972 | 52 | 0.0046% |
1916 | 426 | 176 | 0.0191% | 865 | 63 | 0.0058% |
1915 | 419 | 167 | 0.0189% | 989 | 46 | 0.0045% |
1914 | 423 | 128 | 0.0187% | 875 | 45 | 0.0057% |
1913 | 461 | 89 | 0.0166% | 995 | 30 | 0.0046% |
1912 | 458 | 75 | 0.0166% | 916 | 31 | 0.0053% |
1911 | 409 | 49 | 0.0203% | 976 | 21 | 0.0048% |
1910 | 326 | 58 | 0.0279% | * | * | * |
1909 | 370 | 42 | 0.0238% | * | * | * |
1908 | 392 | 36 | 0.0217% | * | * | * |
1907 | 395 | 33 | 0.0208% | * | * | * |
1906 | 353 | 35 | 0.0243% | * | * | * |
1905 | 353 | 35 | 0.0244% | * | * | * |
1904 | 342 | 35 | 0.0253% | * | * | * |
1903 | 338 | 33 | 0.0255% | * | * | * |
1902 | 333 | 35 | 0.0264% | * | * | * |
1901 | 316 | 32 | 0.0277% | * | * | * |
1900 | 294 | 50 | 0.0308% | * | * | * |
1899 | 351 | 27 | 0.0234% | * | * | * |
1898 | 467 | 20 | 0.0151% | * | * | * |
1897 | 329 | 32 | 0.0262% | * | * | * |
1896 | 378 | 27 | 0.0209% | * | * | * |
1895 | 303 | 36 | 0.0284% | * | * | * |
1894 | 347 | 28 | 0.0224% | * | * | * |
1893 | 346 | 27 | 0.0223% | * | * | * |
1892 | 391 | 24 | 0.0183% | * | * | * |
1891 | 454 | 16 | 0.0146% | * | * | * |
1890 | 325 | 29 | 0.0242% | * | * | * |
1889 | 427 | 19 | 0.0160% | * | * | * |
1888 | 341 | 30 | 0.0231% | * | * | * |
1887 | 387 | 19 | 0.0174% | * | * | * |
1886 | 365 | 23 | 0.0193% | * | * | * |
1885 | 374 | 23 | 0.0198% | * | * | * |
1884 | 350 | 26 | 0.0212% | * | * | * |
1883 | 394 | 20 | 0.0178% | * | * | * |
1882 | 327 | 28 | 0.0229% | * | * | * |
1881 | 384 | 20 | 0.0185% | * | * | * |
1880 | 556 | 12 | 0.0101% | * | * | * |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |