
Ocie: Statistics About The Baby Name Ocie
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
| 1942 | 992 | 46 | 0.0033% | * | * | * |
| 1938 | * | * | * | 990 | 52 | 0.0046% |
| 1936 | * | * | * | 959 | 52 | 0.0048% |
| 1935 | * | * | * | 910 | 58 | 0.0053% |
| 1933 | 932 | 46 | 0.0045% | * | * | * |
| 1931 | 952 | 48 | 0.0045% | 924 | 57 | 0.0052% |
| 1930 | * | * | * | 988 | 56 | 0.0048% |
| 1929 | 895 | 56 | 0.0051% | 949 | 58 | 0.0050% |
| 1928 | * | * | * | 869 | 71 | 0.0059% |
| 1927 | 941 | 54 | 0.0047% | 885 | 71 | 0.0057% |
| 1926 | * | * | * | 834 | 78 | 0.0063% |
| 1925 | * | * | * | 757 | 96 | 0.0076% |
| 1924 | 973 | 53 | 0.0045% | 784 | 91 | 0.0070% |
| 1923 | * | * | * | 986 | 58 | 0.0046% |
| 1922 | * | * | * | 766 | 92 | 0.0074% |
| 1921 | 991 | 51 | 0.0045% | 708 | 110 | 0.0086% |
| 1920 | 922 | 57 | 0.0052% | 764 | 91 | 0.0073% |
| 1919 | 795 | 67 | 0.0066% | 745 | 90 | 0.0077% |
| 1918 | 985 | 47 | 0.0045% | 680 | 112 | 0.0093% |
| 1917 | * | * | * | 611 | 126 | 0.0112% |
| 1916 | 862 | 54 | 0.0058% | 571 | 138 | 0.0127% |
| 1915 | 993 | 41 | 0.0047% | 553 | 135 | 0.0132% |
| 1914 | 877 | 39 | 0.0057% | 568 | 99 | 0.0125% |
| 1913 | 730 | 41 | 0.0077% | 553 | 86 | 0.0132% |
| 1912 | 676 | 40 | 0.0089% | 471 | 104 | 0.0178% |
| 1911 | 852 | 16 | 0.0066% | 477 | 75 | 0.0170% |
| 1910 | 696 | 19 | 0.0091% | 470 | 73 | 0.0174% |
| 1909 | 606 | 20 | 0.0113% | 454 | 68 | 0.0185% |
| 1908 | 732 | 14 | 0.0084% | 610 | 39 | 0.0110% |
| 1907 | 801 | 12 | 0.0076% | 453 | 63 | 0.0187% |
| 1906 | 790 | 11 | 0.0076% | 501 | 48 | 0.0153% |
| 1905 | 779 | 11 | 0.0077% | 475 | 52 | 0.0168% |
| 1904 | 605 | 15 | 0.0108% | 405 | 63 | 0.0215% |
| 1903 | 988 | 7 | 0.0054% | 474 | 46 | 0.0165% |
| 1902 | 640 | 13 | 0.0098% | 451 | 49 | 0.0175% |
| 1901 | * | * | * | 457 | 43 | 0.0169% |
| 1900 | 772 | 12 | 0.0074% | 413 | 67 | 0.0211% |
| 1899 | 919 | 7 | 0.0061% | 535 | 32 | 0.0129% |
| 1898 | * | * | * | 464 | 45 | 0.0164% |
| 1897 | 769 | 9 | 0.0074% | 526 | 32 | 0.0129% |
| 1896 | 762 | 10 | 0.0077% | 390 | 53 | 0.0210% |
| 1895 | 850 | 8 | 0.0063% | 654 | 23 | 0.0093% |
| 1894 | 711 | 10 | 0.0080% | 417 | 45 | 0.0191% |
| 1893 | 747 | 9 | 0.0074% | 431 | 40 | 0.0178% |
| 1892 | 628 | 12 | 0.0091% | 501 | 30 | 0.0133% |
| 1891 | * | * | * | 495 | 28 | 0.0142% |
| 1890 | 591 | 12 | 0.0100% | 576 | 21 | 0.0104% |
| 1889 | 863 | 7 | 0.0059% | 464 | 29 | 0.0153% |
| 1888 | 683 | 10 | 0.0077% | 531 | 23 | 0.0121% |
| 1887 | * | * | * | 532 | 18 | 0.0116% |
| 1886 | 822 | 7 | 0.0059% | 448 | 24 | 0.0156% |
| 1885 | * | * | * | 684 | 11 | 0.0077% |
| 1884 | 937 | 6 | 0.0049% | 437 | 22 | 0.0160% |
| 1883 | 627 | 10 | 0.0089% | 741 | 8 | 0.0067% |
| 1882 | * | * | * | 524 | 13 | 0.0112% |
| 1881 | 635 | 9 | 0.0083% | 531 | 11 | 0.0111% |
| 1880 | * | * | * | 664 | 8 | 0.0082% |
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
