Noe: Statistics About The Baby Name Noe
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
2022 | 756 | 333 | 0.0179% | - | - | - |
2021 | 800 | 304 | 0.0163% | - | - | - |
2020 | 680 | 376 | 0.0204% | - | - | - |
2019 | 701 | 354 | 0.0185% | - | - | - |
2018 | 679 | 366 | 0.0190% | - | - | - |
2017 | 661 | 384 | 0.0196% | - | - | - |
2016 | 655 | 399 | 0.0198% | - | - | - |
2015 | 629 | 422 | 0.0208% | - | - | - |
2014 | 575 | 481 | 0.0237% | - | - | - |
2013 | 605 | 414 | 0.0207% | - | - | - |
2012 | 591 | 429 | 0.0213% | - | - | - |
2011 | 590 | 421 | 0.0209% | - | - | - |
2010 | 534 | 478 | 0.0235% | - | - | - |
2009 | 544 | 479 | 0.0229% | - | - | - |
2008 | 518 | 517 | 0.0240% | - | - | - |
2007 | 442 | 623 | 0.0286% | - | - | - |
2006 | 450 | 591 | 0.0274% | - | - | - |
2005 | 427 | 614 | 0.0294% | - | - | - |
2004 | 437 | 584 | 0.0281% | - | - | - |
2003 | 470 | 532 | 0.0255% | - | - | - |
2002 | 464 | 517 | 0.0251% | - | - | - |
2001 | 435 | 557 | 0.0270% | - | - | - |
2000 | 490 | 475 | 0.0228% | - | - | - |
1999 | 486 | 454 | 0.0223% | - | - | - |
1998 | 474 | 468 | 0.0231% | - | - | - |
1997 | 492 | 433 | 0.0217% | - | - | - |
1996 | 485 | 443 | 0.0221% | - | - | - |
1995 | 517 | 390 | 0.0194% | - | - | - |
1994 | 484 | 439 | 0.0216% | - | - | - |
1993 | 505 | 408 | 0.0198% | - | - | - |
1992 | 537 | 356 | 0.0170% | - | - | - |
1991 | 491 | 409 | 0.0193% | - | - | - |
1990 | 536 | 342 | 0.0159% | - | - | - |
1989 | 537 | 323 | 0.0154% | - | - | - |
1988 | 532 | 293 | 0.0147% | - | - | - |
1987 | 562 | 259 | 0.0133% | - | - | - |
1986 | 528 | 279 | 0.0146% | - | - | - |
1985 | 545 | 260 | 0.0135% | - | - | - |
1984 | 521 | 268 | 0.0143% | - | - | - |
1983 | 572 | 219 | 0.0118% | - | - | - |
1982 | 508 | 279 | 0.0148% | - | - | - |
1981 | 518 | 265 | 0.0143% | - | - | - |
1980 | 498 | 288 | 0.0156% | - | - | - |
1979 | 529 | 257 | 0.0144% | - | - | - |
1978 | 599 | 195 | 0.0114% | - | - | - |
1977 | 584 | 207 | 0.0121% | - | - | - |
1976 | 601 | 183 | 0.0112% | - | - | - |
1975 | 599 | 183 | 0.0113% | - | - | - |
1974 | 658 | 150 | 0.0092% | - | - | - |
1973 | 621 | 162 | 0.0101% | - | - | - |
1972 | 667 | 145 | 0.0087% | - | - | - |
1971 | 694 | 143 | 0.0079% | - | - | - |
1970 | 762 | 117 | 0.0062% | - | - | - |
1969 | 652 | 147 | 0.0080% | - | - | - |
1968 | 658 | 133 | 0.0075% | - | - | - |
1967 | 699 | 113 | 0.0064% | - | - | - |
1966 | 731 | 102 | 0.0056% | - | - | - |
1965 | 658 | 128 | 0.0068% | - | - | - |
1964 | 735 | 110 | 0.0054% | - | - | - |
1963 | 710 | 121 | 0.0059% | - | - | - |
1962 | 707 | 119 | 0.0057% | - | - | - |
1961 | 727 | 112 | 0.0052% | - | - | - |
1960 | 719 | 118 | 0.0055% | - | - | - |
1959 | 739 | 108 | 0.0050% | - | - | - |
1958 | 741 | 99 | 0.0046% | - | - | - |
1957 | 753 | 100 | 0.0046% | - | - | - |
1956 | 697 | 112 | 0.0052% | - | - | - |
1955 | 744 | 96 | 0.0046% | - | - | - |
1954 | 873 | 71 | 0.0034% | - | - | - |
1953 | 825 | 76 | 0.0038% | - | - | - |
1952 | 746 | 90 | 0.0046% | - | - | - |
1951 | 737 | 89 | 0.0047% | - | - | - |
1950 | 833 | 67 | 0.0037% | - | - | - |
1949 | 920 | 57 | 0.0032% | - | - | - |
1948 | 867 | 62 | 0.0035% | - | - | - |
1947 | 914 | 59 | 0.0032% | - | - | - |
1946 | 950 | 50 | 0.0030% | - | - | - |
1945 | 922 | 49 | 0.0036% | - | - | - |
1944 | 864 | 54 | 0.0039% | - | - | - |
1942 | 969 | 48 | 0.0034% | - | - | - |