Nannie: Statistics About The Baby Name Nannie
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1950 | * | * | * | 944 | 91 | 0.0052% |
1949 | * | * | * | 953 | 88 | 0.0050% |
1948 | * | * | * | 814 | 114 | 0.0065% |
1947 | * | * | * | 784 | 122 | 0.0067% |
1946 | * | * | * | 727 | 124 | 0.0077% |
1945 | * | * | * | 653 | 127 | 0.0094% |
1944 | * | * | * | 597 | 152 | 0.0111% |
1943 | * | * | * | 592 | 161 | 0.0112% |
1942 | * | * | * | 577 | 165 | 0.0119% |
1941 | * | * | * | 516 | 180 | 0.0145% |
1940 | * | * | * | 472 | 203 | 0.0172% |
1939 | * | * | * | 470 | 201 | 0.0177% |
1938 | * | * | * | 468 | 208 | 0.0182% |
1937 | * | * | * | 422 | 234 | 0.0212% |
1936 | * | * | * | 401 | 253 | 0.0235% |
1935 | * | * | * | 390 | 270 | 0.0249% |
1934 | * | * | * | 380 | 281 | 0.0260% |
1933 | * | * | * | 380 | 288 | 0.0276% |
1932 | * | * | * | 363 | 309 | 0.0279% |
1931 | * | * | * | 350 | 332 | 0.0301% |
1930 | * | * | * | 354 | 356 | 0.0305% |
1929 | * | * | * | 333 | 375 | 0.0324% |
1928 | * | * | * | 325 | 418 | 0.0350% |
1927 | * | * | * | 309 | 464 | 0.0375% |
1926 | * | * | * | 296 | 512 | 0.0417% |
1925 | * | * | * | 295 | 521 | 0.0413% |
1924 | * | * | * | 279 | 560 | 0.0432% |
1923 | * | * | * | 276 | 546 | 0.0436% |
1922 | * | * | * | 269 | 580 | 0.0465% |
1921 | * | * | * | 272 | 610 | 0.0477% |
1920 | * | * | * | 259 | 653 | 0.0525% |
1919 | * | * | * | 256 | 623 | 0.0530% |
1918 | * | * | * | 255 | 630 | 0.0524% |
1917 | * | * | * | 254 | 596 | 0.0531% |
1916 | * | * | * | 250 | 591 | 0.0545% |
1915 | * | * | * | 241 | 606 | 0.0592% |
1914 | * | * | * | 246 | 458 | 0.0576% |
1913 | * | * | * | 242 | 400 | 0.0613% |
1912 | * | * | * | 216 | 427 | 0.0730% |
1911 | * | * | * | 216 | 327 | 0.0742% |
1910 | * | * | * | 197 | 334 | 0.0798% |
1909 | * | * | * | 170 | 355 | 0.0966% |
1908 | * | * | * | 183 | 313 | 0.0884% |
1907 | * | * | * | 175 | 320 | 0.0949% |
1906 | * | * | * | 167 | 323 | 0.1031% |
1905 | * | * | * | 172 | 303 | 0.0978% |
1904 | * | * | * | 171 | 289 | 0.0988% |
1903 | * | * | * | 157 | 325 | 0.1168% |
1902 | * | * | * | 148 | 359 | 0.1281% |
1901 | * | * | * | 139 | 358 | 0.1408% |
1900 | * | * | * | 136 | 446 | 0.1402% |
1899 | * | * | * | 142 | 331 | 0.1337% |
1898 | * | * | * | 141 | 359 | 0.1309% |
1897 | * | * | * | 144 | 333 | 0.1341% |
1896 | * | * | * | 119 | 400 | 0.1587% |
1895 | * | * | * | 129 | 355 | 0.1437% |
1894 | * | * | * | 123 | 374 | 0.1585% |
1893 | * | * | * | 112 | 391 | 0.1736% |
1892 | * | * | * | 119 | 385 | 0.1712% |
1891 | * | * | * | 125 | 315 | 0.1602% |
1890 | * | * | * | 112 | 355 | 0.1760% |
1889 | * | * | * | 100 | 396 | 0.2093% |
1888 | * | * | * | 104 | 373 | 0.1969% |
1887 | * | * | * | 95 | 340 | 0.2187% |
1886 | * | * | * | 97 | 347 | 0.2257% |
1885 | * | * | * | 104 | 285 | 0.2008% |
1884 | * | * | * | 97 | 314 | 0.2282% |
1883 | * | * | * | 87 | 305 | 0.2540% |
1882 | * | * | * | 86 | 299 | 0.2584% |
1881 | * | * | * | 88 | 258 | 0.2609% |
1880 | * | * | * | 87 | 248 | 0.2540% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |