Muriel: Statistics About The Baby Name Muriel
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1964 | * | * | * | 870 | 142 | 0.0073% |
1963 | * | * | * | 784 | 176 | 0.0089% |
1962 | * | * | * | 824 | 162 | 0.0080% |
1961 | * | * | * | 796 | 172 | 0.0083% |
1960 | * | * | * | 793 | 168 | 0.0081% |
1959 | * | * | * | 801 | 164 | 0.0079% |
1958 | * | * | * | 772 | 168 | 0.0081% |
1957 | * | * | * | 670 | 215 | 0.0103% |
1956 | * | * | * | 641 | 220 | 0.0107% |
1955 | * | * | * | 586 | 246 | 0.0123% |
1954 | * | * | * | 545 | 266 | 0.0134% |
1953 | * | * | * | 494 | 310 | 0.0161% |
1952 | * | * | * | 471 | 320 | 0.0168% |
1951 | * | * | * | 458 | 331 | 0.0180% |
1950 | * | * | * | 445 | 328 | 0.0187% |
1949 | * | * | * | 396 | 405 | 0.0231% |
1948 | * | * | * | 404 | 387 | 0.0222% |
1947 | * | * | * | 379 | 446 | 0.0246% |
1946 | * | * | * | 382 | 398 | 0.0247% |
1945 | * | * | * | 347 | 391 | 0.0290% |
1944 | * | * | * | 309 | 471 | 0.0345% |
1943 | * | * | * | 301 | 531 | 0.0371% |
1942 | * | * | * | 303 | 517 | 0.0371% |
1941 | * | * | * | 275 | 539 | 0.0433% |
1940 | * | * | * | 258 | 581 | 0.0492% |
1939 | * | * | * | 258 | 584 | 0.0515% |
1938 | * | * | * | 234 | 707 | 0.0620% |
1937 | * | * | * | 232 | 703 | 0.0638% |
1936 | * | * | * | 235 | 695 | 0.0645% |
1935 | * | * | * | 215 | 795 | 0.0732% |
1934 | * | * | * | 214 | 832 | 0.0769% |
1933 | * | * | * | 198 | 871 | 0.0833% |
1932 | * | * | * | 181 | 1,043 | 0.0943% |
1931 | * | * | * | 172 | 1,080 | 0.0980% |
1930 | * | * | * | 155 | 1,340 | 0.1150% |
1929 | * | * | * | 149 | 1,457 | 0.1259% |
1928 | * | * | * | 139 | 1,661 | 0.1391% |
1927 | * | * | * | 138 | 1,805 | 0.1461% |
1926 | * | * | * | 129 | 2,027 | 0.1649% |
1925 | * | * | * | 126 | 2,213 | 0.1753% |
1924 | * | * | * | 126 | 2,233 | 0.1723% |
1923 | * | * | * | 113 | 2,360 | 0.1885% |
1922 | * | * | * | 112 | 2,391 | 0.1917% |
1921 | * | * | * | 119 | 2,248 | 0.1758% |
1920 | * | * | * | 123 | 2,072 | 0.1666% |
1919 | * | * | * | 133 | 1,789 | 0.1523% |
1918 | * | * | * | 130 | 1,800 | 0.1497% |
1917 | * | * | * | 128 | 1,713 | 0.1525% |
1916 | * | * | * | 134 | 1,524 | 0.1405% |
1915 | * | * | * | 134 | 1,443 | 0.1410% |
1914 | * | * | * | 133 | 1,133 | 0.1426% |
1913 | * | * | * | 137 | 880 | 0.1348% |
1912 | * | * | * | 155 | 693 | 0.1184% |
1911 | * | * | * | 204 | 351 | 0.0797% |
1910 | * | * | * | 187 | 364 | 0.0870% |
1909 | * | * | * | 190 | 311 | 0.0846% |
1908 | * | * | * | 207 | 262 | 0.0740% |
1907 | * | * | * | 223 | 219 | 0.0650% |
1906 | * | * | * | 207 | 221 | 0.0706% |
1905 | * | * | * | 230 | 186 | 0.0600% |
1904 | * | * | * | 206 | 214 | 0.0732% |
1903 | * | * | * | 191 | 220 | 0.0791% |
1902 | * | * | * | 205 | 206 | 0.0735% |
1901 | * | * | * | 206 | 195 | 0.0767% |
1900 | * | * | * | 211 | 224 | 0.0704% |
1899 | * | * | * | 212 | 167 | 0.0675% |
1898 | * | * | * | 268 | 129 | 0.0471% |
1897 | * | * | * | 223 | 152 | 0.0612% |
1896 | * | * | * | 232 | 144 | 0.0571% |
1895 | * | * | * | 272 | 108 | 0.0437% |
1894 | * | * | * | 292 | 90 | 0.0381% |
1893 | * | * | * | 290 | 87 | 0.0386% |
1892 | * | * | * | 325 | 69 | 0.0307% |
1891 | * | * | * | 329 | 59 | 0.0300% |
1890 | * | * | * | 336 | 58 | 0.0288% |
1889 | * | * | * | 343 | 53 | 0.0280% |
1888 | * | * | * | 368 | 43 | 0.0227% |
1887 | * | * | * | 408 | 29 | 0.0187% |
1886 | * | * | * | 436 | 25 | 0.0163% |
1885 | * | * | * | 410 | 26 | 0.0183% |
1884 | * | * | * | 435 | 22 | 0.0160% |
1883 | * | * | * | 459 | 18 | 0.0150% |
1882 | * | * | * | 487 | 15 | 0.0130% |
1881 | * | * | * | 530 | 11 | 0.0111% |
1880 | * | * | * | 719 | 7 | 0.0072% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |