
Mikel: Statistics About The Baby Name Mikel
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
| 2006 | 990 | 184 | 0.0085% | * | * | * |
| 2005 | 980 | 173 | 0.0083% | * | * | * |
| 2004 | 868 | 199 | 0.0096% | * | * | * |
| 2003 | 966 | 165 | 0.0079% | * | * | * |
| 2002 | 949 | 168 | 0.0082% | * | * | * |
| 2001 | 877 | 179 | 0.0087% | * | * | * |
| 2000 | 852 | 187 | 0.0090% | * | * | * |
| 1999 | 817 | 187 | 0.0092% | * | * | * |
| 1998 | 860 | 169 | 0.0084% | * | * | * |
| 1997 | 875 | 159 | 0.0080% | * | * | * |
| 1996 | 842 | 168 | 0.0084% | * | * | * |
| 1995 | 911 | 148 | 0.0074% | * | * | * |
| 1994 | 869 | 153 | 0.0075% | * | * | * |
| 1993 | 760 | 189 | 0.0092% | * | * | * |
| 1992 | 849 | 155 | 0.0074% | * | * | * |
| 1991 | 746 | 186 | 0.0088% | * | * | * |
| 1990 | 757 | 182 | 0.0085% | * | * | * |
| 1989 | 698 | 198 | 0.0095% | * | * | * |
| 1988 | 747 | 161 | 0.0081% | * | * | * |
| 1987 | 797 | 135 | 0.0069% | * | * | * |
| 1986 | 777 | 136 | 0.0071% | * | * | * |
| 1985 | 703 | 157 | 0.0082% | * | * | * |
| 1984 | 769 | 126 | 0.0067% | * | * | * |
| 1983 | 726 | 141 | 0.0076% | * | * | * |
| 1982 | 767 | 131 | 0.0070% | * | * | * |
| 1981 | 775 | 126 | 0.0068% | * | * | * |
| 1980 | 779 | 126 | 0.0068% | * | * | * |
| 1979 | 751 | 133 | 0.0074% | * | * | * |
| 1978 | 734 | 132 | 0.0077% | * | * | * |
| 1977 | 748 | 130 | 0.0076% | * | * | * |
| 1976 | 736 | 129 | 0.0079% | * | * | * |
| 1975 | 719 | 133 | 0.0082% | * | * | * |
| 1974 | 711 | 134 | 0.0082% | * | * | * |
| 1973 | 773 | 106 | 0.0066% | * | * | * |
| 1972 | 754 | 112 | 0.0067% | * | * | * |
| 1971 | 735 | 126 | 0.0069% | * | * | * |
| 1970 | 733 | 126 | 0.0066% | * | * | * |
| 1969 | 715 | 120 | 0.0066% | * | * | * |
| 1968 | 726 | 107 | 0.0060% | * | * | * |
| 1967 | 726 | 104 | 0.0058% | * | * | * |
| 1966 | 772 | 89 | 0.0049% | * | * | * |
| 1965 | 734 | 102 | 0.0054% | * | * | * |
| 1964 | 740 | 108 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
| 1963 | 734 | 112 | 0.0054% | * | * | * |
| 1962 | 653 | 140 | 0.0067% | * | * | * |
| 1961 | 673 | 134 | 0.0062% | * | * | * |
| 1960 | 704 | 124 | 0.0057% | * | * | * |
| 1959 | 637 | 148 | 0.0068% | * | * | * |
| 1958 | 580 | 179 | 0.0083% | * | * | * |
| 1957 | 554 | 192 | 0.0088% | * | * | * |
| 1956 | 555 | 186 | 0.0087% | * | * | * |
| 1955 | 594 | 153 | 0.0073% | * | * | * |
| 1954 | 627 | 139 | 0.0067% | * | * | * |
| 1953 | 508 | 191 | 0.0096% | * | * | * |
| 1952 | 691 | 102 | 0.0052% | * | * | * |
| 1951 | 649 | 118 | 0.0062% | * | * | * |
| 1950 | 705 | 95 | 0.0052% | * | * | * |
| 1949 | 784 | 77 | 0.0043% | * | * | * |
| 1948 | 860 | 64 | 0.0036% | * | * | * |
| 1947 | 840 | 68 | 0.0037% | * | * | * |
| 1946 | 889 | 55 | 0.0033% | * | * | * |
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
