
Micah: Statistics About The Baby Name Micah
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
| 2024 | 86 | 3,909 | 0.2118% | 841 | 320 | 0.0181% |
| 2023 | 87 | 3,875 | 0.2116% | * | * | * |
| 2022 | 90 | 3,933 | 0.2110% | * | * | * |
| 2021 | 107 | 3,583 | 0.1926% | 982 | 263 | 0.0148% |
| 2020 | 107 | 3,390 | 0.1838% | * | * | * |
| 2019 | 110 | 3,461 | 0.1813% | 950 | 277 | 0.0152% |
| 2018 | 103 | 3,718 | 0.1928% | 980 | 268 | 0.0145% |
| 2017 | 107 | 3,660 | 0.1864% | 982 | 264 | 0.0141% |
| 2016 | 115 | 3,477 | 0.1723% | 966 | 278 | 0.0144% |
| 2015 | 108 | 3,700 | 0.1825% | 834 | 334 | 0.0173% |
| 2014 | 109 | 3,612 | 0.1779% | 994 | 264 | 0.0136% |
| 2013 | 107 | 3,631 | 0.1815% | 878 | 291 | 0.0152% |
| 2012 | 103 | 3,713 | 0.1848% | 873 | 303 | 0.0158% |
| 2011 | 104 | 3,711 | 0.1844% | 912 | 283 | 0.0147% |
| 2010 | 108 | 3,516 | 0.1729% | 847 | 315 | 0.0162% |
| 2009 | 118 | 3,490 | 0.1665% | 818 | 341 | 0.0170% |
| 2008 | 123 | 3,448 | 0.1603% | 892 | 308 | 0.0150% |
| 2007 | 126 | 3,249 | 0.1490% | 772 | 369 | 0.0177% |
| 2006 | 148 | 2,781 | 0.1290% | 714 | 391 | 0.0190% |
| 2005 | 151 | 2,645 | 0.1267% | 878 | 285 | 0.0143% |
| 2004 | 163 | 2,436 | 0.1171% | 759 | 338 | 0.0170% |
| 2003 | 173 | 2,263 | 0.1084% | 704 | 370 | 0.0186% |
| 2002 | 174 | 2,208 | 0.1073% | 639 | 397 | 0.0202% |
| 2001 | 179 | 2,095 | 0.1016% | 626 | 398 | 0.0202% |
| 2000 | 186 | 1,966 | 0.0944% | 641 | 391 | 0.0197% |
| 1999 | 194 | 1,734 | 0.0852% | 587 | 419 | 0.0216% |
| 1998 | 199 | 1,679 | 0.0830% | 582 | 415 | 0.0215% |
| 1997 | 202 | 1,567 | 0.0786% | 614 | 368 | 0.0193% |
| 1996 | 210 | 1,476 | 0.0738% | 628 | 358 | 0.0187% |
| 1995 | 212 | 1,384 | 0.0689% | 630 | 346 | 0.0180% |
| 1994 | 246 | 1,167 | 0.0573% | 723 | 288 | 0.0148% |
| 1993 | 240 | 1,201 | 0.0582% | 746 | 278 | 0.0141% |
| 1992 | 241 | 1,196 | 0.0571% | 769 | 270 | 0.0135% |
| 1991 | 246 | 1,134 | 0.0536% | 815 | 252 | 0.0124% |
| 1990 | 238 | 1,176 | 0.0547% | 907 | 212 | 0.0103% |
| 1989 | 237 | 1,117 | 0.0534% | 973 | 179 | 0.0090% |
| 1988 | 225 | 1,108 | 0.0555% | 855 | 209 | 0.0109% |
| 1987 | 224 | 1,066 | 0.0548% | 889 | 189 | 0.0101% |
| 1986 | 216 | 1,100 | 0.0574% | 894 | 183 | 0.0099% |
| 1985 | 208 | 1,145 | 0.0596% | 943 | 166 | 0.0090% |
| 1984 | 207 | 1,113 | 0.0594% | 868 | 176 | 0.0098% |
| 1983 | 219 | 1,036 | 0.0557% | 925 | 161 | 0.0090% |
| 1982 | 216 | 1,122 | 0.0596% | 968 | 153 | 0.0084% |
| 1981 | 213 | 1,164 | 0.0626% | 920 | 163 | 0.0091% |
| 1980 | 228 | 1,046 | 0.0565% | * | * | * |
| 1979 | 205 | 1,145 | 0.0640% | * | * | * |
| 1978 | 215 | 1,005 | 0.0590% | 960 | 145 | 0.0088% |
| 1977 | 211 | 1,052 | 0.0617% | * | * | * |
| 1976 | 227 | 897 | 0.0550% | * | * | * |
| 1975 | 254 | 789 | 0.0487% | * | * | * |
| 1974 | 272 | 696 | 0.0428% | * | * | * |
| 1973 | 327 | 528 | 0.0328% | * | * | * |
| 1972 | 408 | 371 | 0.0222% | * | * | * |
| 1971 | 491 | 268 | 0.0148% | * | * | * |
| 1970 | 540 | 225 | 0.0118% | * | * | * |
| 1969 | 596 | 172 | 0.0094% | * | * | * |
| 1968 | 660 | 130 | 0.0073% | * | * | * |
| 1967 | 658 | 129 | 0.0073% | * | * | * |
| 1966 | 717 | 108 | 0.0059% | * | * | * |
| 1965 | 686 | 118 | 0.0062% | * | * | * |
| 1964 | 776 | 95 | 0.0047% | * | * | * |
| 1963 | 784 | 95 | 0.0046% | * | * | * |
| 1962 | 731 | 110 | 0.0052% | * | * | * |
| 1961 | 758 | 103 | 0.0048% | * | * | * |
| 1960 | 896 | 72 | 0.0033% | * | * | * |
| 1959 | 957 | 65 | 0.0030% | * | * | * |
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
