Mary: Statistics About The Baby Name Mary
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
| 2024 | * | * | * | 132 | 2,196 | 0.1242% |
| 2023 | * | * | * | 135 | 2,062 | 0.1179% |
| 2022 | * | * | * | 136 | 2,097 | 0.1175% |
| 2021 | * | * | * | 133 | 2,080 | 0.1169% |
| 2020 | * | * | * | 123 | 2,210 | 0.1254% |
| 2019 | * | * | * | 126 | 2,209 | 0.1212% |
| 2018 | * | * | * | 126 | 2,327 | 0.1260% |
| 2017 | * | * | * | 126 | 2,381 | 0.1270% |
| 2016 | * | * | * | 127 | 2,504 | 0.1298% |
| 2015 | * | * | * | 124 | 2,602 | 0.1345% |
| 2014 | * | * | * | 120 | 2,611 | 0.1347% |
| 2013 | * | * | * | 121 | 2,602 | 0.1363% |
| 2012 | * | * | * | 123 | 2,535 | 0.1319% |
| 2011 | * | * | * | 112 | 2,671 | 0.1391% |
| 2010 | * | * | * | 109 | 2,826 | 0.1456% |
| 2009 | * | * | * | 102 | 3,105 | 0.1551% |
| 2008 | * | * | * | 97 | 3,428 | 0.1668% |
| 2007 | * | * | * | 93 | 3,622 | 0.1738% |
| 2006 | * | * | * | 84 | 3,983 | 0.1937% |
| 2005 | * | * | * | 73 | 4,327 | 0.2172% |
| 2004 | * | * | * | 63 | 4,701 | 0.2367% |
| 2003 | * | * | * | 59 | 4,954 | 0.2484% |
| 2002 | * | * | * | 51 | 5,410 | 0.2752% |
| 2001 | * | * | * | 49 | 5,684 | 0.2880% |
| 2000 | * | * | * | 47 | 6,143 | 0.3087% |
| 1999 | * | * | * | 45 | 6,325 | 0.3257% |
| 1998 | * | * | * | 45 | 6,393 | 0.3305% |
| 1997 | * | * | * | 46 | 6,595 | 0.3460% |
| 1996 | * | * | * | 44 | 6,909 | 0.3609% |
| 1995 | * | * | * | 40 | 7,390 | 0.3851% |
| 1994 | * | * | * | 38 | 7,711 | 0.3961% |
| 1993 | * | * | * | 38 | 8,056 | 0.4092% |
| 1992 | * | * | * | 37 | 8,405 | 0.4198% |
| 1991 | * | * | * | 38 | 8,715 | 0.4290% |
| 1990 | * | * | * | 35 | 8,628 | 0.4206% |
| 1989 | * | * | * | 38 | 8,618 | 0.4329% |
| 1988 | * | * | * | 34 | 8,449 | 0.4404% |
| 1987 | * | * | * | 37 | 8,372 | 0.4473% |
| 1986 | * | * | * | 37 | 8,469 | 0.4598% |
| 1985 | * | * | * | 35 | 9,217 | 0.5000% |
| 1984 | * | * | * | 34 | 9,269 | 0.5149% |
| 1983 | * | * | * | 32 | 9,888 | 0.5533% |
| 1982 | * | * | * | 30 | 10,836 | 0.5983% |
| 1981 | * | * | * | 27 | 11,009 | 0.6165% |
| 1980 | * | * | * | 26 | 11,466 | 0.6449% |
| 1979 | * | * | * | 24 | 10,532 | 0.6118% |
| 1978 | * | * | * | 24 | 10,040 | 0.6116% |
| 1977 | * | * | * | 21 | 10,653 | 0.6483% |
| 1976 | * | * | * | 22 | 10,323 | 0.6573% |
| 1975 | * | * | * | 19 | 10,969 | 0.7034% |
| 1974 | * | * | * | 13 | 11,767 | 0.7518% |
| 1973 | * | * | * | 14 | 12,323 | 0.7934% |
| 1972 | 942 | 73 | 0.0044% | 13 | 13,779 | 0.8549% |
| 1971 | 879 | 86 | 0.0047% | 9 | 16,701 | 0.9539% |
| 1970 | 813 | 99 | 0.0052% | 9 | 19,204 | 1.0491% |
| 1969 | 752 | 108 | 0.0059% | 8 | 19,876 | 1.1281% |
| 1968 | 744 | 101 | 0.0057% | 5 | 21,744 | 1.2723% |
| 1967 | 668 | 126 | 0.0071% | 4 | 25,333 | 1.4761% |
| 1966 | 712 | 109 | 0.0060% | 3 | 28,890 | 1.6463% |
| 1965 | 643 | 136 | 0.0072% | 2 | 34,288 | 1.8769% |
| 1964 | 668 | 134 | 0.0066% | 2 | 40,990 | 2.0952% |
| 1963 | 672 | 136 | 0.0066% | 2 | 41,556 | 2.0909% |
| 1962 | 613 | 158 | 0.0075% | 2 | 43,481 | 2.1458% |
| 1961 | 614 | 167 | 0.0078% | 1 | 47,616 | 2.2954% |
| 1960 | 604 | 169 | 0.0078% | 1 | 51,473 | 2.4752% |
| 1959 | 599 | 169 | 0.0078% | 1 | 54,464 | 2.6211% |
| 1958 | 650 | 141 | 0.0066% | 1 | 55,821 | 2.7047% |
| 1957 | 569 | 184 | 0.0084% | 1 | 61,099 | 2.9141% |
| 1956 | 634 | 142 | 0.0066% | 1 | 61,740 | 2.9990% |
| 1955 | 605 | 149 | 0.0071% | 1 | 63,140 | 3.1514% |
| 1954 | 564 | 169 | 0.0082% | 1 | 67,989 | 3.4161% |
| 1953 | 595 | 146 | 0.0073% | 1 | 64,268 | 3.3343% |
| 1952 | 559 | 157 | 0.0080% | 2 | 65,697 | 3.4539% |
| 1951 | 534 | 160 | 0.0084% | 2 | 65,545 | 3.5557% |
| 1950 | 641 | 118 | 0.0065% | 2 | 65,428 | 3.7215% |
| 1949 | 509 | 171 | 0.0095% | 2 | 66,817 | 3.8089% |
| 1948 | 515 | 164 | 0.0092% | 2 | 68,567 | 3.9381% |
| 1947 | 498 | 180 | 0.0097% | 2 | 71,574 | 3.9413% |
| 1946 | 461 | 191 | 0.0116% | 1 | 67,328 | 4.1823% |
| 1945 | 426 | 196 | 0.0143% | 1 | 59,297 | 4.4054% |
| 1944 | 377 | 253 | 0.0183% | 1 | 62,419 | 4.5725% |
| 1943 | 384 | 252 | 0.0174% | 1 | 65,976 | 4.6078% |
| 1942 | 363 | 279 | 0.0198% | 1 | 63,290 | 4.5476% |
| 1941 | 329 | 313 | 0.0250% | 1 | 57,974 | 4.6575% |
| 1940 | 325 | 304 | 0.0256% | 1 | 56,220 | 4.7598% |
| 1939 | 341 | 270 | 0.0238% | 1 | 54,913 | 4.8424% |
| 1938 | 332 | 284 | 0.0250% | 1 | 56,193 | 4.9245% |
| 1937 | 319 | 289 | 0.0265% | 1 | 55,612 | 5.0497% |
| 1936 | 313 | 292 | 0.0275% | 1 | 54,368 | 5.0481% |
| 1935 | 329 | 277 | 0.0259% | 1 | 55,057 | 5.0688% |
| 1934 | 313 | 302 | 0.0285% | 1 | 56,876 | 5.2578% |
| 1933 | 299 | 317 | 0.0311% | 1 | 55,437 | 5.3037% |
| 1932 | 305 | 331 | 0.0309% | 1 | 59,834 | 5.4104% |
| 1931 | 306 | 322 | 0.0302% | 1 | 60,258 | 5.4661% |
| 1930 | 307 | 339 | 0.0301% | 1 | 64,060 | 5.4968% |
| 1929 | 305 | 329 | 0.0298% | 1 | 63,510 | 5.4895% |
| 1928 | 328 | 295 | 0.0259% | 1 | 66,814 | 5.5946% |
| 1927 | 350 | 280 | 0.0241% | 1 | 70,552 | 5.7093% |
| 1926 | 357 | 266 | 0.0232% | 1 | 67,816 | 5.5178% |
| 1925 | 368 | 263 | 0.0229% | 1 | 70,562 | 5.5895% |
| 1924 | 411 | 223 | 0.0191% | 1 | 73,508 | 5.6729% |
| 1923 | 426 | 202 | 0.0178% | 1 | 71,614 | 5.7193% |
| 1922 | 451 | 187 | 0.0166% | 1 | 72,151 | 5.7853% |
| 1921 | 449 | 189 | 0.0166% | 1 | 73,899 | 5.7795% |
| 1920 | 429 | 195 | 0.0177% | 1 | 70,959 | 5.7065% |
| 1919 | 482 | 154 | 0.0152% | 1 | 65,839 | 5.6056% |
| 1918 | 458 | 168 | 0.0160% | 1 | 67,372 | 5.6031% |
| 1917 | 449 | 158 | 0.0165% | 1 | 64,258 | 5.7216% |
| 1916 | 437 | 164 | 0.0178% | 1 | 61,384 | 5.6575% |
| 1915 | 430 | 159 | 0.0180% | 1 | 58,134 | 5.6821% |
| 1914 | 428 | 125 | 0.0183% | 1 | 45,263 | 5.6951% |
| 1913 | 376 | 125 | 0.0233% | 1 | 36,544 | 5.5962% |
| 1912 | 350 | 118 | 0.0262% | 1 | 32,229 | 5.5078% |
| 1911 | 262 | 98 | 0.0407% | 1 | 24,313 | 5.5202% |
| 1910 | 237 | 99 | 0.0476% | 1 | 22,794 | 5.4457% |
| 1909 | 248 | 80 | 0.0453% | 1 | 19,215 | 5.2300% |
| 1908 | 236 | 79 | 0.0475% | 1 | 18,642 | 5.2654% |
| 1907 | 252 | 70 | 0.0442% | 1 | 17,569 | 5.2109% |
| 1906 | 225 | 76 | 0.0528% | 1 | 16,360 | 5.2229% |
| 1905 | 239 | 68 | 0.0475% | 1 | 16,062 | 5.1850% |
| 1904 | 252 | 58 | 0.0419% | 1 | 14,964 | 5.1174% |
| 1903 | 230 | 63 | 0.0487% | 1 | 14,269 | 5.1300% |
| 1902 | 249 | 56 | 0.0422% | 1 | 14,481 | 5.1659% |
| 1901 | 231 | 58 | 0.0502% | 1 | 13,138 | 5.1678% |
| 1900 | 234 | 75 | 0.0461% | 1 | 16,717 | 5.2559% |
| 1899 | 236 | 50 | 0.0434% | 1 | 13,172 | 5.3221% |
| 1898 | 251 | 50 | 0.0378% | 1 | 14,406 | 5.2545% |
| 1897 | 211 | 63 | 0.0516% | 1 | 13,414 | 5.4029% |
| 1896 | 242 | 57 | 0.0441% | 1 | 13,811 | 5.4803% |
| 1895 | 261 | 47 | 0.0371% | 1 | 13,449 | 5.4423% |
| 1894 | 251 | 48 | 0.0384% | 1 | 13,153 | 5.5735% |
| 1893 | 232 | 55 | 0.0454% | 1 | 12,784 | 5.6757% |
| 1892 | 251 | 50 | 0.0380% | 1 | 13,174 | 5.8570% |
| 1891 | 259 | 39 | 0.0357% | 1 | 11,708 | 5.9558% |
| 1890 | 293 | 35 | 0.0292% | 1 | 12,079 | 5.9895% |
| 1889 | 262 | 41 | 0.0344% | 1 | 11,649 | 6.1559% |
| 1888 | 248 | 50 | 0.0385% | 1 | 11,754 | 6.2037% |
| 1887 | 237 | 47 | 0.0430% | 1 | 9,888 | 6.3614% |
| 1886 | 305 | 32 | 0.0269% | 1 | 9,891 | 6.4331% |
| 1885 | 271 | 38 | 0.0328% | 1 | 9,129 | 6.4305% |
| 1884 | 293 | 36 | 0.0293% | 1 | 9,217 | 6.6986% |
| 1883 | 292 | 32 | 0.0284% | 1 | 8,013 | 6.6732% |
| 1882 | 315 | 30 | 0.0246% | 1 | 8,149 | 7.0428% |
| 1881 | 301 | 29 | 0.0268% | 1 | 6,920 | 6.9991% |
| 1880 | 332 | 27 | 0.0228% | 1 | 7,066 | 7.2383% |
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||