Mariah: Statistics About The Baby Name Mariah
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
| 2022 | - | - | - | 345 | 921 | 0.0516% |
| 2021 | - | - | - | 342 | 937 | 0.0527% |
| 2020 | - | - | - | 304 | 1,061 | 0.0602% |
| 2019 | - | - | - | 276 | 1,180 | 0.0647% |
| 2018 | - | - | - | 217 | 1,416 | 0.0767% |
| 2017 | - | - | - | 193 | 1,604 | 0.0856% |
| 2016 | - | - | - | 166 | 1,916 | 0.0994% |
| 2015 | - | - | - | 155 | 2,087 | 0.1078% |
| 2014 | - | - | - | 136 | 2,383 | 0.1229% |
| 2013 | - | - | - | 114 | 2,733 | 0.1431% |
| 2012 | - | - | - | 108 | 2,856 | 0.1486% |
| 2011 | - | - | - | 98 | 2,956 | 0.1539% |
| 2010 | - | - | - | 97 | 3,070 | 0.1581% |
| 2009 | - | - | - | 88 | 3,538 | 0.1767% |
| 2008 | - | - | - | 78 | 3,978 | 0.1935% |
| 2007 | - | - | - | 92 | 3,632 | 0.1743% |
| 2006 | - | - | - | 81 | 4,002 | 0.1946% |
| 2005 | - | - | - | 85 | 3,756 | 0.1885% |
| 2004 | - | - | - | 113 | 2,918 | 0.1469% |
| 2003 | - | - | - | 113 | 3,051 | 0.1530% |
| 2002 | - | - | - | 130 | 2,657 | 0.1351% |
| 2001 | - | - | - | 85 | 3,565 | 0.1806% |
| 2000 | - | - | - | 76 | 4,084 | 0.2053% |
| 1999 | - | - | - | 68 | 4,635 | 0.2386% |
| 1998 | - | - | - | 62 | 5,077 | 0.2624% |
| 1997 | - | - | - | 67 | 4,796 | 0.2516% |
| 1996 | - | - | - | 63 | 5,440 | 0.2841% |
| 1995 | - | - | - | 72 | 4,767 | 0.2484% |
| 1994 | - | - | - | 74 | 4,749 | 0.2440% |
| 1993 | - | - | - | 80 | 4,086 | 0.2075% |
| 1992 | - | - | - | 74 | 4,705 | 0.2350% |
| 1991 | - | - | - | 69 | 5,183 | 0.2552% |
| 1990 | - | - | - | 259 | 1,101 | 0.0537% |
| 1989 | - | - | - | 563 | 396 | 0.0199% |
| 1988 | - | - | - | 520 | 424 | 0.0221% |
| 1987 | - | - | - | 496 | 436 | 0.0233% |
| 1986 | - | - | - | 674 | 273 | 0.0148% |
| 1985 | - | - | - | 572 | 343 | 0.0186% |
| 1984 | - | - | - | 585 | 311 | 0.0173% |
| 1983 | - | - | - | 548 | 336 | 0.0188% |
| 1982 | - | - | - | 540 | 359 | 0.0198% |
| 1981 | - | - | - | 576 | 321 | 0.0180% |
| 1980 | - | - | - | 512 | 386 | 0.0217% |
| 1979 | - | - | - | 591 | 306 | 0.0178% |
| 1978 | - | - | - | 589 | 288 | 0.0175% |
| 1977 | - | - | - | 578 | 299 | 0.0182% |
| 1976 | - | - | - | 759 | 190 | 0.0121% |
| 1975 | - | - | - | 859 | 156 | 0.0100% |
| 1973 | - | - | - | 912 | 135 | 0.0087% |
| 1913 | - | - | - | 955 | 32 | 0.0049% |
| 1911 | - | - | - | 865 | 25 | 0.0057% |
| 1910 | - | - | - | 870 | 25 | 0.0060% |
| 1908 | - | - | - | 930 | 19 | 0.0054% |
| 1907 | - | - | - | 938 | 17 | 0.0050% |
| 1906 | - | - | - | 757 | 24 | 0.0077% |
| 1905 | - | - | - | 725 | 25 | 0.0081% |
| 1904 | - | - | - | 718 | 24 | 0.0082% |
| 1903 | - | - | - | 723 | 22 | 0.0079% |
| 1902 | - | - | - | 729 | 23 | 0.0082% |
| 1901 | - | - | - | 906 | 14 | 0.0055% |
| 1900 | - | - | - | 669 | 29 | 0.0091% |
| 1899 | - | - | - | 809 | 17 | 0.0069% |
| 1898 | - | - | - | 646 | 26 | 0.0095% |
| 1897 | - | - | - | 609 | 26 | 0.0105% |
| 1896 | - | - | - | 665 | 23 | 0.0091% |
| 1895 | - | - | - | 559 | 29 | 0.0117% |
| 1894 | - | - | - | 511 | 32 | 0.0136% |
| 1893 | - | - | - | 528 | 28 | 0.0124% |
| 1892 | - | - | - | 586 | 23 | 0.0102% |
| 1891 | - | - | - | 582 | 21 | 0.0107% |
| 1890 | - | - | - | 474 | 31 | 0.0154% |
| 1889 | - | - | - | 448 | 30 | 0.0159% |
| 1888 | - | - | - | 589 | 19 | 0.0100% |
| 1887 | - | - | - | 400 | 30 | 0.0193% |
| 1886 | - | - | - | 446 | 24 | 0.0156% |
| 1885 | - | - | - | 409 | 26 | 0.0183% |
| 1884 | - | - | - | 445 | 21 | 0.0153% |
| 1883 | - | - | - | 507 | 15 | 0.0125% |
| 1882 | - | - | - | 386 | 22 | 0.0190% |
| 1881 | - | - | - | 483 | 13 | 0.0131% |
| 1880 | - | - | - | 349 | 22 | 0.0225% |
