Marguerite: Statistics About The Baby Name Marguerite
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1972 | * | * | * | 966 | 126 | 0.0078% |
1971 | * | * | * | 992 | 127 | 0.0073% |
1970 | * | * | * | 764 | 190 | 0.0104% |
1969 | * | * | * | 761 | 177 | 0.0100% |
1968 | * | * | * | 694 | 195 | 0.0114% |
1967 | * | * | * | 633 | 228 | 0.0133% |
1966 | * | * | * | 553 | 291 | 0.0166% |
1965 | * | * | * | 500 | 361 | 0.0198% |
1964 | * | * | * | 494 | 390 | 0.0199% |
1963 | * | * | * | 495 | 384 | 0.0193% |
1962 | * | * | * | 447 | 464 | 0.0229% |
1961 | * | * | * | 438 | 505 | 0.0243% |
1960 | * | * | * | 430 | 520 | 0.0250% |
1959 | * | * | * | 398 | 557 | 0.0268% |
1958 | * | * | * | 369 | 607 | 0.0294% |
1957 | * | * | * | 347 | 679 | 0.0324% |
1956 | * | * | * | 344 | 653 | 0.0317% |
1955 | * | * | * | 319 | 721 | 0.0360% |
1954 | * | * | * | 300 | 789 | 0.0396% |
1953 | * | * | * | 287 | 831 | 0.0431% |
1952 | * | * | * | 278 | 842 | 0.0443% |
1951 | * | * | * | 270 | 848 | 0.0460% |
1950 | * | * | * | 251 | 902 | 0.0513% |
1949 | * | * | * | 253 | 900 | 0.0513% |
1948 | * | * | * | 247 | 917 | 0.0527% |
1947 | * | * | * | 257 | 851 | 0.0469% |
1946 | * | * | * | 249 | 801 | 0.0498% |
1945 | * | * | * | 256 | 692 | 0.0514% |
1944 | * | * | * | 235 | 763 | 0.0559% |
1943 | * | * | * | 231 | 846 | 0.0591% |
1942 | * | * | * | 236 | 814 | 0.0585% |
1941 | * | * | * | 224 | 774 | 0.0622% |
1940 | * | * | * | 220 | 753 | 0.0638% |
1939 | * | * | * | 216 | 771 | 0.0680% |
1938 | * | * | * | 209 | 825 | 0.0723% |
1937 | * | * | * | 205 | 806 | 0.0732% |
1936 | * | * | * | 207 | 792 | 0.0735% |
1935 | * | * | * | 207 | 829 | 0.0763% |
1934 | * | * | * | 188 | 933 | 0.0862% |
1933 | * | * | * | 190 | 896 | 0.0857% |
1932 | * | * | * | 183 | 998 | 0.0902% |
1931 | * | * | * | 157 | 1,192 | 0.1081% |
1930 | * | * | * | 159 | 1,285 | 0.1103% |
1929 | * | * | * | 155 | 1,361 | 0.1176% |
1928 | * | * | * | 147 | 1,577 | 0.1320% |
1927 | * | * | * | 143 | 1,700 | 0.1376% |
1926 | * | * | * | 136 | 1,863 | 0.1516% |
1925 | * | * | * | 132 | 2,065 | 0.1636% |
1924 | * | * | * | 125 | 2,245 | 0.1733% |
1923 | * | * | * | 115 | 2,359 | 0.1884% |
1922 | * | * | * | 106 | 2,655 | 0.2129% |
1921 | * | * | * | 98 | 2,896 | 0.2265% |
1920 | * | * | * | 93 | 3,053 | 0.2455% |
1919 | * | * | * | 96 | 2,834 | 0.2413% |
1918 | * | * | * | 86 | 3,255 | 0.2707% |
1917 | * | * | * | 78 | 3,159 | 0.2813% |
1916 | * | * | * | 78 | 3,036 | 0.2798% |
1915 | * | * | * | 84 | 2,685 | 0.2624% |
1914 | * | * | * | 84 | 2,047 | 0.2576% |
1913 | * | * | * | 78 | 1,821 | 0.2789% |
1912 | * | * | * | 79 | 1,616 | 0.2762% |
1911 | * | * | * | 87 | 1,107 | 0.2513% |
1910 | * | * | * | 84 | 1,083 | 0.2587% |
1909 | * | * | * | 81 | 1,034 | 0.2814% |
1908 | * | * | * | 88 | 911 | 0.2573% |
1907 | * | * | * | 86 | 890 | 0.2640% |
1906 | * | * | * | 89 | 791 | 0.2525% |
1905 | * | * | * | 90 | 754 | 0.2434% |
1904 | * | * | * | 94 | 684 | 0.2339% |
1903 | * | * | * | 91 | 668 | 0.2402% |
1902 | * | * | * | 90 | 694 | 0.2476% |
1901 | * | * | * | 83 | 699 | 0.2749% |
1900 | * | * | * | 86 | 787 | 0.2474% |
1899 | * | * | * | 83 | 695 | 0.2808% |
1898 | * | * | * | 78 | 801 | 0.2922% |
1897 | * | * | * | 78 | 729 | 0.2936% |
1896 | * | * | * | 78 | 728 | 0.2889% |
1895 | * | * | * | 81 | 682 | 0.2760% |
1894 | * | * | * | 83 | 625 | 0.2648% |
1893 | * | * | * | 79 | 638 | 0.2833% |
1892 | * | * | * | 91 | 536 | 0.2383% |
1891 | * | * | * | 84 | 512 | 0.2604% |
1890 | * | * | * | 96 | 442 | 0.2192% |
1889 | * | * | * | 120 | 316 | 0.1670% |
1888 | * | * | * | 141 | 235 | 0.1240% |
1887 | * | * | * | 146 | 178 | 0.1145% |
1886 | * | * | * | 181 | 125 | 0.0813% |
1885 | * | * | * | 211 | 86 | 0.0606% |
1884 | * | * | * | 184 | 96 | 0.0698% |
1883 | * | * | * | 209 | 70 | 0.0583% |
1882 | * | * | * | 239 | 52 | 0.0449% |
1881 | * | * | * | 212 | 52 | 0.0526% |
1880 | * | * | * | 222 | 49 | 0.0502% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |