
Mandy: Statistics About The Baby Name Mandy
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
| 2005 | * | * | * | 917 | 267 | 0.0134% |
| 2004 | * | * | * | 840 | 288 | 0.0145% |
| 2003 | * | * | * | 960 | 242 | 0.0121% |
| 2002 | * | * | * | 945 | 236 | 0.0120% |
| 2001 | * | * | * | 950 | 232 | 0.0118% |
| 2000 | * | * | * | 995 | 213 | 0.0107% |
| 1999 | * | * | * | 949 | 219 | 0.0113% |
| 1997 | * | * | * | 848 | 241 | 0.0126% |
| 1996 | * | * | * | 792 | 263 | 0.0137% |
| 1995 | * | * | * | 793 | 250 | 0.0130% |
| 1994 | * | * | * | 758 | 274 | 0.0141% |
| 1993 | * | * | * | 659 | 338 | 0.0172% |
| 1992 | * | * | * | 645 | 350 | 0.0175% |
| 1991 | * | * | * | 562 | 414 | 0.0204% |
| 1990 | * | * | * | 467 | 525 | 0.0256% |
| 1989 | * | * | * | 425 | 584 | 0.0293% |
| 1988 | * | * | * | 312 | 793 | 0.0413% |
| 1987 | * | * | * | 264 | 960 | 0.0513% |
| 1986 | * | * | * | 247 | 1,052 | 0.0571% |
| 1985 | * | * | * | 206 | 1,266 | 0.0687% |
| 1984 | * | * | * | 233 | 1,092 | 0.0607% |
| 1983 | * | * | * | 196 | 1,343 | 0.0752% |
| 1982 | * | * | * | 169 | 1,715 | 0.0947% |
| 1981 | * | * | * | 135 | 2,086 | 0.1168% |
| 1980 | * | * | * | 132 | 2,231 | 0.1255% |
| 1979 | * | * | * | 116 | 2,717 | 0.1578% |
| 1978 | * | * | * | 96 | 3,107 | 0.1893% |
| 1977 | * | * | * | 94 | 3,103 | 0.1888% |
| 1976 | * | * | * | 100 | 2,924 | 0.1862% |
| 1975 | * | * | * | 106 | 2,703 | 0.1733% |
| 1974 | * | * | * | 438 | 444 | 0.0284% |
| 1973 | * | * | * | 473 | 383 | 0.0247% |
| 1972 | * | * | * | 528 | 322 | 0.0200% |
| 1971 | * | * | * | 594 | 293 | 0.0167% |
| 1970 | * | * | * | 678 | 234 | 0.0128% |
| 1969 | * | * | * | 681 | 214 | 0.0121% |
| 1968 | * | * | * | 647 | 225 | 0.0132% |
| 1967 | * | * | * | 699 | 196 | 0.0114% |
| 1966 | * | * | * | 708 | 192 | 0.0109% |
| 1965 | * | * | * | 734 | 185 | 0.0101% |
| 1964 | * | * | * | 669 | 233 | 0.0119% |
| 1963 | * | * | * | 787 | 174 | 0.0088% |
| 1962 | * | * | * | 772 | 181 | 0.0089% |
| 1961 | * | * | * | 891 | 146 | 0.0070% |
| 1960 | * | * | * | 857 | 147 | 0.0071% |
| 1959 | * | * | * | 850 | 145 | 0.0070% |
| 1958 | * | * | * | 909 | 128 | 0.0062% |
| 1957 | * | * | * | 861 | 140 | 0.0067% |
| 1936 | * | * | * | 999 | 48 | 0.0045% |
| 1933 | * | * | * | 978 | 50 | 0.0048% |
| 1932 | * | * | * | 919 | 59 | 0.0053% |
| 1931 | * | * | * | 873 | 62 | 0.0056% |
| 1930 | * | * | * | 999 | 55 | 0.0047% |
| 1928 | * | * | * | 858 | 72 | 0.0060% |
| 1927 | * | * | * | 758 | 91 | 0.0074% |
| 1926 | * | * | * | 796 | 83 | 0.0068% |
| 1925 | * | * | * | 747 | 98 | 0.0078% |
| 1924 | * | * | * | 858 | 77 | 0.0059% |
| 1923 | * | * | * | 775 | 89 | 0.0071% |
| 1922 | * | * | * | 783 | 87 | 0.0070% |
| 1921 | * | * | * | 715 | 105 | 0.0082% |
| 1920 | * | * | * | 768 | 90 | 0.0072% |
| 1919 | * | * | * | 707 | 99 | 0.0084% |
| 1918 | * | * | * | 689 | 109 | 0.0091% |
| 1917 | * | * | * | 783 | 79 | 0.0070% |
| 1916 | * | * | * | 699 | 97 | 0.0089% |
| 1915 | * | * | * | 733 | 83 | 0.0081% |
| 1914 | * | * | * | 600 | 90 | 0.0113% |
| 1913 | * | * | * | 720 | 53 | 0.0081% |
| 1912 | * | * | * | 637 | 61 | 0.0104% |
| 1911 | * | * | * | 553 | 59 | 0.0134% |
| 1910 | * | * | * | 477 | 72 | 0.0172% |
| 1909 | * | * | * | 481 | 61 | 0.0166% |
| 1908 | * | * | * | 532 | 48 | 0.0136% |
| 1907 | * | * | * | 502 | 51 | 0.0151% |
| 1906 | * | * | * | 491 | 50 | 0.0160% |
| 1905 | * | * | * | 417 | 67 | 0.0216% |
| 1904 | * | * | * | 459 | 51 | 0.0174% |
| 1903 | * | * | * | 446 | 52 | 0.0187% |
| 1902 | * | * | * | 438 | 51 | 0.0182% |
| 1901 | * | * | * | 408 | 54 | 0.0212% |
| 1900 | * | * | * | 385 | 76 | 0.0239% |
| 1899 | * | * | * | 447 | 43 | 0.0174% |
| 1898 | * | * | * | 435 | 50 | 0.0182% |
| 1897 | * | * | * | 484 | 36 | 0.0145% |
| 1896 | * | * | * | 389 | 53 | 0.0210% |
| 1895 | * | * | * | 392 | 52 | 0.0210% |
| 1894 | * | * | * | 374 | 56 | 0.0237% |
| 1893 | * | * | * | 384 | 50 | 0.0222% |
| 1892 | * | * | * | 356 | 56 | 0.0249% |
| 1891 | * | * | * | 370 | 46 | 0.0234% |
| 1890 | * | * | * | 365 | 48 | 0.0238% |
| 1889 | * | * | * | 366 | 44 | 0.0233% |
| 1888 | * | * | * | 315 | 58 | 0.0306% |
| 1887 | * | * | * | 357 | 37 | 0.0238% |
| 1886 | * | * | * | 250 | 69 | 0.0449% |
| 1885 | * | * | * | 270 | 55 | 0.0387% |
| 1884 | * | * | * | 311 | 40 | 0.0291% |
| 1883 | * | * | * | 298 | 35 | 0.0291% |
| 1882 | * | * | * | 275 | 41 | 0.0354% |
| 1881 | * | * | * | 255 | 40 | 0.0405% |
| 1880 | * | * | * | 269 | 34 | 0.0348% |
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
