Luz: Statistics About The Baby Name Luz
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
2023 | * | * | * | 843 | 321 | 0.0184% |
2022 | * | * | * | 943 | 286 | 0.0160% |
2019 | * | * | * | 895 | 296 | 0.0162% |
2015 | * | * | * | 959 | 281 | 0.0145% |
2013 | * | * | * | 890 | 286 | 0.0150% |
2012 | * | * | * | 864 | 305 | 0.0159% |
2011 | * | * | * | 870 | 298 | 0.0155% |
2010 | * | * | * | 744 | 371 | 0.0191% |
2009 | * | * | * | 751 | 374 | 0.0187% |
2008 | * | * | * | 732 | 402 | 0.0196% |
2007 | * | * | * | 603 | 490 | 0.0235% |
2006 | * | * | * | 591 | 483 | 0.0235% |
2005 | * | * | * | 597 | 467 | 0.0234% |
2004 | * | * | * | 601 | 459 | 0.0231% |
2003 | * | * | * | 577 | 476 | 0.0239% |
2002 | * | * | * | 594 | 434 | 0.0221% |
2001 | * | * | * | 517 | 517 | 0.0262% |
2000 | * | * | * | 533 | 489 | 0.0246% |
1999 | * | * | * | 463 | 572 | 0.0295% |
1998 | * | * | * | 499 | 510 | 0.0264% |
1997 | * | * | * | 509 | 478 | 0.0251% |
1996 | * | * | * | 679 | 322 | 0.0168% |
1995 | * | * | * | 657 | 325 | 0.0169% |
1994 | * | * | * | 646 | 335 | 0.0172% |
1993 | * | * | * | 631 | 357 | 0.0181% |
1992 | * | * | * | 632 | 357 | 0.0178% |
1991 | * | * | * | 625 | 359 | 0.0177% |
1990 | * | * | * | 606 | 373 | 0.0182% |
1989 | * | * | * | 623 | 339 | 0.0170% |
1988 | * | * | * | 644 | 306 | 0.0160% |
1987 | * | * | * | 574 | 346 | 0.0185% |
1986 | * | * | * | 603 | 319 | 0.0173% |
1985 | * | * | * | 585 | 334 | 0.0181% |
1984 | * | * | * | 584 | 311 | 0.0173% |
1983 | * | * | * | 538 | 348 | 0.0195% |
1982 | * | * | * | 524 | 372 | 0.0205% |
1981 | * | * | * | 535 | 351 | 0.0197% |
1980 | * | * | * | 492 | 420 | 0.0236% |
1979 | * | * | * | 455 | 447 | 0.0260% |
1978 | * | * | * | 521 | 355 | 0.0216% |
1977 | * | * | * | 511 | 364 | 0.0222% |
1976 | * | * | * | 487 | 375 | 0.0239% |
1975 | * | * | * | 488 | 377 | 0.0242% |
1974 | * | * | * | 475 | 375 | 0.0240% |
1973 | * | * | * | 504 | 341 | 0.0220% |
1972 | * | * | * | 455 | 410 | 0.0254% |
1971 | * | * | * | 480 | 401 | 0.0229% |
1970 | * | * | * | 475 | 426 | 0.0233% |
1969 | * | * | * | 460 | 441 | 0.0250% |
1968 | * | * | * | 471 | 417 | 0.0244% |
1967 | * | * | * | 509 | 349 | 0.0203% |
1966 | * | * | * | 485 | 371 | 0.0211% |
1965 | * | * | * | 541 | 306 | 0.0168% |
1964 | * | * | * | 530 | 343 | 0.0175% |
1963 | * | * | * | 539 | 321 | 0.0162% |
1962 | * | * | * | 588 | 284 | 0.0140% |
1961 | * | * | * | 604 | 278 | 0.0134% |
1960 | * | * | * | 587 | 285 | 0.0137% |
1959 | * | * | * | 631 | 249 | 0.0120% |
1958 | * | * | * | 628 | 244 | 0.0118% |
1957 | * | * | * | 673 | 213 | 0.0102% |
1956 | * | * | * | 631 | 229 | 0.0111% |
1955 | * | * | * | 661 | 201 | 0.0100% |
1954 | * | * | * | 694 | 181 | 0.0091% |
1953 | * | * | * | 727 | 156 | 0.0081% |
1952 | * | * | * | 903 | 105 | 0.0055% |
1951 | * | * | * | 860 | 109 | 0.0059% |
1950 | * | * | * | 958 | 89 | 0.0051% |
1948 | * | * | * | 958 | 83 | 0.0048% |
1930 | * | * | * | 904 | 65 | 0.0056% |
1929 | * | * | * | 822 | 74 | 0.0064% |
1928 | * | * | * | 728 | 95 | 0.0080% |
1927 | * | * | * | 789 | 85 | 0.0069% |
1926 | * | * | * | 982 | 58 | 0.0047% |
1925 | * | * | * | 968 | 60 | 0.0048% |
1924 | * | * | * | 924 | 68 | 0.0052% |
1922 | * | * | * | 974 | 59 | 0.0047% |
1913 | * | * | * | 937 | 33 | 0.0051% |
1907 | * | * | * | 972 | 16 | 0.0047% |
1887 | * | * | * | 910 | 8 | 0.0051% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |