Lula: Statistics About The Baby Name Lula
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1965 | * | * | * | 995 | 109 | 0.0060% |
1964 | * | * | * | 775 | 177 | 0.0090% |
1963 | * | * | * | 868 | 146 | 0.0073% |
1962 | * | * | * | 809 | 167 | 0.0082% |
1961 | * | * | * | 723 | 207 | 0.0100% |
1960 | * | * | * | 650 | 242 | 0.0116% |
1959 | * | * | * | 653 | 235 | 0.0113% |
1958 | * | * | * | 615 | 259 | 0.0125% |
1957 | * | * | * | 546 | 309 | 0.0147% |
1956 | * | * | * | 516 | 329 | 0.0160% |
1955 | * | * | * | 492 | 343 | 0.0171% |
1954 | * | * | * | 431 | 407 | 0.0204% |
1953 | * | * | * | 436 | 405 | 0.0210% |
1952 | * | * | * | 378 | 478 | 0.0251% |
1951 | * | * | * | 348 | 529 | 0.0287% |
1950 | * | * | * | 340 | 528 | 0.0300% |
1949 | * | * | * | 304 | 648 | 0.0369% |
1948 | * | * | * | 320 | 588 | 0.0338% |
1947 | * | * | * | 299 | 696 | 0.0383% |
1946 | * | * | * | 284 | 673 | 0.0418% |
1945 | * | * | * | 252 | 720 | 0.0535% |
1944 | * | * | * | 250 | 721 | 0.0528% |
1943 | * | * | * | 248 | 777 | 0.0543% |
1942 | * | * | * | 224 | 860 | 0.0618% |
1941 | * | * | * | 215 | 818 | 0.0657% |
1940 | * | * | * | 212 | 819 | 0.0693% |
1939 | * | * | * | 193 | 923 | 0.0814% |
1938 | * | * | * | 192 | 964 | 0.0845% |
1937 | * | * | * | 181 | 1,093 | 0.0992% |
1936 | * | * | * | 175 | 1,100 | 0.1021% |
1935 | * | * | * | 174 | 1,081 | 0.0995% |
1934 | * | * | * | 166 | 1,121 | 0.1036% |
1933 | * | * | * | 165 | 1,089 | 0.1042% |
1932 | * | * | * | 158 | 1,225 | 0.1108% |
1931 | * | * | * | 162 | 1,155 | 0.1048% |
1930 | * | * | * | 157 | 1,311 | 0.1125% |
1929 | * | * | * | 158 | 1,332 | 0.1151% |
1928 | * | * | * | 156 | 1,380 | 0.1156% |
1927 | * | * | * | 150 | 1,580 | 0.1279% |
1926 | * | * | * | 154 | 1,567 | 0.1275% |
1925 | * | * | * | 149 | 1,708 | 0.1353% |
1924 | * | * | * | 148 | 1,770 | 0.1366% |
1923 | * | * | * | 151 | 1,672 | 0.1335% |
1922 | * | * | * | 142 | 1,755 | 0.1407% |
1921 | * | * | * | 143 | 1,784 | 0.1395% |
1920 | * | * | * | 139 | 1,761 | 0.1416% |
1919 | * | * | * | 134 | 1,775 | 0.1511% |
1918 | * | * | * | 132 | 1,766 | 0.1469% |
1917 | * | * | * | 135 | 1,609 | 0.1433% |
1916 | * | * | * | 127 | 1,677 | 0.1546% |
1915 | * | * | * | 130 | 1,529 | 0.1494% |
1914 | * | * | * | 121 | 1,343 | 0.1690% |
1913 | * | * | * | 110 | 1,176 | 0.1801% |
1912 | * | * | * | 107 | 1,091 | 0.1864% |
1911 | * | * | * | 94 | 966 | 0.2193% |
1910 | * | * | * | 93 | 972 | 0.2322% |
1909 | * | * | * | 91 | 923 | 0.2512% |
1908 | * | * | * | 89 | 889 | 0.2511% |
1907 | * | * | * | 84 | 905 | 0.2684% |
1906 | * | * | * | 79 | 910 | 0.2905% |
1905 | * | * | * | 78 | 963 | 0.3109% |
1904 | * | * | * | 77 | 894 | 0.3057% |
1903 | 886 | 8 | 0.0062% | 73 | 913 | 0.3282% |
1902 | 988 | 7 | 0.0053% | 71 | 975 | 0.3478% |
1901 | * | * | * | 67 | 905 | 0.3560% |
1900 | * | * | * | 62 | 1,237 | 0.3889% |
1899 | * | * | * | 67 | 894 | 0.3612% |
1898 | 690 | 11 | 0.0083% | 64 | 1,070 | 0.3903% |
1897 | * | * | * | 63 | 971 | 0.3911% |
1896 | * | * | * | 64 | 1,012 | 0.4016% |
1895 | * | * | * | 64 | 987 | 0.3994% |
1894 | 918 | 7 | 0.0056% | 60 | 1,042 | 0.4415% |
1893 | * | * | * | 57 | 1,034 | 0.4591% |
1892 | * | * | * | 53 | 1,098 | 0.4882% |
1891 | * | * | * | 50 | 1,010 | 0.5138% |
1890 | * | * | * | 48 | 1,121 | 0.5559% |
1889 | * | * | * | 47 | 1,067 | 0.5639% |
1888 | * | * | * | 44 | 1,173 | 0.6191% |
1887 | * | * | * | 47 | 891 | 0.5732% |
1886 | * | * | * | 40 | 1,040 | 0.6764% |
1885 | * | * | * | 41 | 949 | 0.6685% |
1884 | * | * | * | 39 | 916 | 0.6657% |
1883 | * | * | * | 43 | 790 | 0.6579% |
1882 | * | * | * | 40 | 780 | 0.6741% |
1881 | * | * | * | 36 | 655 | 0.6625% |
1880 | * | * | * | 39 | 621 | 0.6361% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |