
Lucinda: Statistics About The Baby Name Lucinda
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
| 1987 | * | * | * | 977 | 162 | 0.0087% |
| 1986 | * | * | * | 837 | 199 | 0.0108% |
| 1985 | * | * | * | 749 | 231 | 0.0125% |
| 1984 | * | * | * | 723 | 228 | 0.0127% |
| 1983 | * | * | * | 722 | 231 | 0.0129% |
| 1982 | * | * | * | 710 | 244 | 0.0135% |
| 1981 | * | * | * | 618 | 293 | 0.0164% |
| 1980 | * | * | * | 638 | 285 | 0.0160% |
| 1979 | * | * | * | 662 | 263 | 0.0153% |
| 1978 | * | * | * | 645 | 251 | 0.0153% |
| 1977 | * | * | * | 659 | 242 | 0.0147% |
| 1976 | * | * | * | 572 | 287 | 0.0183% |
| 1975 | * | * | * | 541 | 319 | 0.0205% |
| 1974 | * | * | * | 504 | 347 | 0.0222% |
| 1973 | * | * | * | 490 | 359 | 0.0231% |
| 1972 | * | * | * | 448 | 420 | 0.0261% |
| 1971 | * | * | * | 407 | 527 | 0.0301% |
| 1970 | * | * | * | 381 | 623 | 0.0340% |
| 1969 | * | * | * | 329 | 756 | 0.0429% |
| 1968 | * | * | * | 374 | 592 | 0.0346% |
| 1967 | * | * | * | 415 | 506 | 0.0295% |
| 1966 | * | * | * | 406 | 521 | 0.0297% |
| 1965 | * | * | * | 368 | 614 | 0.0336% |
| 1964 | * | * | * | 360 | 689 | 0.0352% |
| 1963 | * | * | * | 369 | 679 | 0.0342% |
| 1962 | * | * | * | 354 | 718 | 0.0354% |
| 1961 | * | * | * | 331 | 812 | 0.0391% |
| 1960 | * | * | * | 331 | 809 | 0.0389% |
| 1959 | * | * | * | 327 | 824 | 0.0397% |
| 1958 | * | * | * | 298 | 896 | 0.0434% |
| 1957 | * | * | * | 272 | 1,023 | 0.0488% |
| 1956 | * | * | * | 294 | 923 | 0.0448% |
| 1955 | * | * | * | 300 | 847 | 0.0423% |
| 1954 | * | * | * | 263 | 999 | 0.0502% |
| 1953 | * | * | * | 260 | 976 | 0.0506% |
| 1952 | * | * | * | 265 | 909 | 0.0478% |
| 1951 | * | * | * | 277 | 798 | 0.0433% |
| 1950 | * | * | * | 273 | 790 | 0.0449% |
| 1949 | * | * | * | 265 | 842 | 0.0480% |
| 1948 | * | * | * | 278 | 751 | 0.0431% |
| 1947 | * | * | * | 321 | 595 | 0.0328% |
| 1946 | * | * | * | 374 | 412 | 0.0256% |
| 1945 | * | * | * | 370 | 362 | 0.0269% |
| 1944 | * | * | * | 401 | 316 | 0.0231% |
| 1943 | * | * | * | 404 | 328 | 0.0229% |
| 1942 | * | * | * | 430 | 285 | 0.0205% |
| 1941 | * | * | * | 419 | 272 | 0.0219% |
| 1940 | * | * | * | 469 | 205 | 0.0174% |
| 1939 | * | * | * | 518 | 167 | 0.0147% |
| 1938 | * | * | * | 546 | 156 | 0.0137% |
| 1937 | * | * | * | 526 | 158 | 0.0143% |
| 1936 | * | * | * | 586 | 128 | 0.0119% |
| 1935 | * | * | * | 538 | 142 | 0.0131% |
| 1934 | * | * | * | 561 | 130 | 0.0120% |
| 1933 | * | * | * | 589 | 120 | 0.0115% |
| 1932 | * | * | * | 579 | 130 | 0.0118% |
| 1931 | * | * | * | 630 | 111 | 0.0101% |
| 1930 | * | * | * | 580 | 140 | 0.0120% |
| 1929 | * | * | * | 543 | 159 | 0.0137% |
| 1928 | * | * | * | 557 | 159 | 0.0133% |
| 1927 | * | * | * | 611 | 137 | 0.0111% |
| 1926 | * | * | * | 553 | 163 | 0.0133% |
| 1925 | * | * | * | 528 | 182 | 0.0144% |
| 1924 | * | * | * | 581 | 161 | 0.0124% |
| 1923 | * | * | * | 488 | 200 | 0.0160% |
| 1922 | * | * | * | 518 | 183 | 0.0147% |
| 1921 | * | * | * | 549 | 168 | 0.0131% |
| 1920 | * | * | * | 488 | 199 | 0.0160% |
| 1919 | * | * | * | 487 | 190 | 0.0162% |
| 1918 | * | * | * | 501 | 184 | 0.0153% |
| 1917 | * | * | * | 479 | 187 | 0.0167% |
| 1916 | * | * | * | 428 | 215 | 0.0198% |
| 1915 | * | * | * | 457 | 182 | 0.0178% |
| 1914 | * | * | * | 467 | 137 | 0.0172% |
| 1913 | * | * | * | 386 | 156 | 0.0239% |
| 1912 | * | * | * | 378 | 148 | 0.0253% |
| 1911 | * | * | * | 368 | 120 | 0.0272% |
| 1910 | * | * | * | 359 | 123 | 0.0294% |
| 1909 | * | * | * | 359 | 103 | 0.0280% |
| 1908 | * | * | * | 337 | 112 | 0.0316% |
| 1907 | * | * | * | 341 | 105 | 0.0311% |
| 1906 | * | * | * | 330 | 105 | 0.0335% |
| 1905 | * | * | * | 325 | 107 | 0.0345% |
| 1904 | * | * | * | 324 | 101 | 0.0345% |
| 1903 | * | * | * | 323 | 92 | 0.0331% |
| 1902 | * | * | * | 329 | 91 | 0.0325% |
| 1901 | * | * | * | 306 | 95 | 0.0374% |
| 1900 | * | * | * | 298 | 123 | 0.0387% |
| 1899 | * | * | * | 309 | 94 | 0.0380% |
| 1898 | * | * | * | 282 | 118 | 0.0430% |
| 1897 | * | * | * | 297 | 96 | 0.0387% |
| 1896 | * | * | * | 256 | 124 | 0.0492% |
| 1895 | * | * | * | 284 | 98 | 0.0397% |
| 1894 | * | * | * | 272 | 104 | 0.0441% |
| 1893 | * | * | * | 289 | 87 | 0.0386% |
| 1892 | * | * | * | 243 | 122 | 0.0542% |
| 1891 | * | * | * | 246 | 98 | 0.0499% |
| 1890 | * | * | * | 247 | 101 | 0.0501% |
| 1889 | * | * | * | 258 | 84 | 0.0444% |
| 1888 | * | * | * | 236 | 97 | 0.0512% |
| 1887 | * | * | * | 218 | 92 | 0.0592% |
| 1886 | * | * | * | 211 | 90 | 0.0585% |
| 1885 | * | * | * | 216 | 84 | 0.0592% |
| 1884 | * | * | * | 204 | 86 | 0.0625% |
| 1883 | * | * | * | 174 | 92 | 0.0766% |
| 1882 | * | * | * | 166 | 93 | 0.0804% |
| 1881 | * | * | * | 153 | 88 | 0.0890% |
| 1880 | * | * | * | 193 | 63 | 0.0645% |
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
