Lucille: Statistics About The Baby Name Lucille
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
2023 | * | * | * | 285 | 1,102 | 0.0630% |
2022 | * | * | * | 281 | 1,126 | 0.0631% |
2021 | * | * | * | 276 | 1,133 | 0.0637% |
2020 | * | * | * | 273 | 1,135 | 0.0644% |
2019 | * | * | * | 296 | 1,118 | 0.0613% |
2018 | * | * | * | 295 | 1,115 | 0.0604% |
2017 | * | * | * | 264 | 1,197 | 0.0638% |
2016 | * | * | * | 283 | 1,128 | 0.0585% |
2015 | * | * | * | 283 | 1,112 | 0.0575% |
2014 | * | * | * | 343 | 966 | 0.0498% |
2013 | * | * | * | 359 | 869 | 0.0455% |
2012 | * | * | * | 394 | 780 | 0.0406% |
2011 | * | * | * | 455 | 661 | 0.0344% |
2010 | * | * | * | 482 | 621 | 0.0320% |
2009 | * | * | * | 570 | 529 | 0.0264% |
2008 | * | * | * | 615 | 492 | 0.0239% |
2007 | * | * | * | 759 | 379 | 0.0182% |
2006 | * | * | * | 728 | 380 | 0.0185% |
2005 | * | * | * | 799 | 317 | 0.0159% |
2004 | * | * | * | 875 | 277 | 0.0139% |
2003 | * | * | * | 942 | 248 | 0.0124% |
1976 | * | * | * | 945 | 136 | 0.0087% |
1974 | * | * | * | 954 | 130 | 0.0083% |
1973 | * | * | * | 992 | 120 | 0.0077% |
1972 | * | * | * | 835 | 158 | 0.0098% |
1971 | * | * | * | 737 | 203 | 0.0116% |
1970 | * | * | * | 669 | 237 | 0.0129% |
1969 | * | * | * | 618 | 259 | 0.0147% |
1968 | * | * | * | 581 | 272 | 0.0159% |
1967 | * | * | * | 545 | 300 | 0.0175% |
1966 | * | * | * | 493 | 361 | 0.0206% |
1965 | * | * | * | 469 | 413 | 0.0226% |
1964 | * | * | * | 448 | 476 | 0.0243% |
1963 | * | * | * | 435 | 500 | 0.0252% |
1962 | * | * | * | 422 | 530 | 0.0262% |
1961 | * | * | * | 382 | 631 | 0.0304% |
1960 | * | * | * | 370 | 675 | 0.0325% |
1959 | * | * | * | 336 | 792 | 0.0381% |
1958 | * | * | * | 327 | 820 | 0.0397% |
1957 | * | * | * | 296 | 946 | 0.0451% |
1956 | * | * | * | 262 | 1,046 | 0.0508% |
1955 | * | * | * | 243 | 1,141 | 0.0569% |
1954 | * | * | * | 220 | 1,326 | 0.0666% |
1953 | * | * | * | 203 | 1,495 | 0.0776% |
1952 | * | * | * | 198 | 1,456 | 0.0765% |
1951 | * | * | * | 194 | 1,478 | 0.0802% |
1950 | * | * | * | 180 | 1,555 | 0.0884% |
1949 | * | * | * | 164 | 1,747 | 0.0996% |
1948 | * | * | * | 154 | 1,852 | 0.1064% |
1947 | * | * | * | 147 | 1,999 | 0.1101% |
1946 | * | * | * | 137 | 1,959 | 0.1217% |
1945 | * | * | * | 129 | 1,881 | 0.1397% |
1944 | * | * | * | 132 | 1,977 | 0.1448% |
1943 | * | * | * | 125 | 2,244 | 0.1567% |
1942 | * | * | * | 118 | 2,310 | 0.1660% |
1941 | * | * | * | 119 | 2,203 | 0.1770% |
1940 | * | * | * | 113 | 2,266 | 0.1918% |
1939 | * | * | * | 110 | 2,310 | 0.2037% |
1938 | * | * | * | 107 | 2,474 | 0.2168% |
1937 | * | * | * | 98 | 2,642 | 0.2399% |
1936 | * | * | * | 92 | 2,633 | 0.2445% |
1935 | * | * | * | 85 | 2,887 | 0.2658% |
1934 | * | * | * | 84 | 2,939 | 0.2717% |
1933 | * | * | * | 78 | 3,116 | 0.2981% |
1932 | * | * | * | 63 | 3,645 | 0.3296% |
1931 | * | * | * | 62 | 3,851 | 0.3493% |
1930 | * | * | * | 59 | 4,329 | 0.3715% |
1929 | * | * | * | 57 | 4,499 | 0.3889% |
1928 | * | * | * | 51 | 5,078 | 0.4252% |
1927 | * | * | * | 45 | 5,625 | 0.4552% |
1926 | * | * | * | 43 | 5,763 | 0.4689% |
1925 | * | * | * | 41 | 6,388 | 0.5060% |
1924 | * | * | * | 37 | 6,758 | 0.5215% |
1923 | * | * | * | 35 | 6,912 | 0.5520% |
1922 | * | * | * | 33 | 7,147 | 0.5731% |
1921 | * | * | * | 31 | 7,688 | 0.6013% |
1920 | * | * | * | 29 | 7,976 | 0.6414% |
1919 | * | * | * | 27 | 7,856 | 0.6689% |
1918 | * | * | * | 29 | 7,912 | 0.6580% |
1917 | * | * | * | 29 | 7,517 | 0.6693% |
1916 | * | * | * | 30 | 7,238 | 0.6671% |
1915 | * | * | * | 29 | 6,997 | 0.6839% |
1914 | * | * | * | 30 | 5,296 | 0.6664% |
1913 | * | * | * | 31 | 4,083 | 0.6253% |
1912 | * | * | * | 32 | 3,751 | 0.6410% |
1911 | * | * | * | 32 | 2,729 | 0.6196% |
1910 | * | * | * | 31 | 2,689 | 0.6424% |
1909 | 788 | 14 | 0.0079% | 36 | 2,189 | 0.5958% |
1908 | 997 | 9 | 0.0054% | 38 | 2,077 | 0.5866% |
1907 | * | * | * | 45 | 1,853 | 0.5496% |
1906 | 831 | 10 | 0.0069% | 47 | 1,670 | 0.5331% |
1905 | * | * | * | 50 | 1,532 | 0.4945% |
1904 | * | * | * | 53 | 1,350 | 0.4617% |
1903 | * | * | * | 57 | 1,192 | 0.4285% |
1902 | * | * | * | 61 | 1,087 | 0.3878% |
1901 | * | * | * | 70 | 893 | 0.3513% |
1900 | * | * | * | 67 | 1,182 | 0.3716% |
1899 | * | * | * | 71 | 812 | 0.3281% |
1898 | * | * | * | 80 | 795 | 0.2900% |
1897 | * | * | * | 82 | 648 | 0.2610% |
1896 | * | * | * | 86 | 637 | 0.2528% |
1895 | * | * | * | 101 | 532 | 0.2153% |
1894 | * | * | * | 109 | 440 | 0.1864% |
1893 | * | * | * | 117 | 368 | 0.1634% |
1892 | * | * | * | 120 | 380 | 0.1689% |
1891 | * | * | * | 141 | 253 | 0.1287% |
1890 | * | * | * | 148 | 241 | 0.1195% |
1889 | * | * | * | 152 | 208 | 0.1099% |
1888 | * | * | * | 164 | 179 | 0.0945% |
1887 | * | * | * | 165 | 149 | 0.0959% |
1886 | * | * | * | 166 | 139 | 0.0904% |
1885 | * | * | * | 188 | 100 | 0.0704% |
1884 | * | * | * | 189 | 94 | 0.0683% |
1883 | * | * | * | 221 | 66 | 0.0550% |
1882 | * | * | * | 171 | 85 | 0.0735% |
1881 | * | * | * | 224 | 48 | 0.0485% |
1880 | * | * | * | 249 | 40 | 0.0410% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |