Louise: Statistics About The Baby Name Louise
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
2023 | * | * | * | 586 | 510 | 0.0292% |
2022 | * | * | * | 638 | 459 | 0.0257% |
2021 | * | * | * | 643 | 458 | 0.0257% |
2020 | * | * | * | 683 | 415 | 0.0235% |
2019 | * | * | * | 687 | 420 | 0.0230% |
2018 | * | * | * | 800 | 339 | 0.0184% |
2017 | * | * | * | 805 | 336 | 0.0179% |
2016 | * | * | * | 893 | 312 | 0.0162% |
1987 | * | * | * | 963 | 166 | 0.0089% |
1986 | * | * | * | 974 | 162 | 0.0088% |
1985 | * | * | * | 839 | 193 | 0.0105% |
1984 | * | * | * | 778 | 207 | 0.0115% |
1983 | * | * | * | 793 | 198 | 0.0111% |
1982 | * | * | * | 685 | 255 | 0.0141% |
1981 | * | * | * | 733 | 225 | 0.0126% |
1980 | * | * | * | 722 | 231 | 0.0130% |
1979 | * | * | * | 771 | 208 | 0.0121% |
1978 | * | * | * | 774 | 199 | 0.0121% |
1977 | * | * | * | 738 | 208 | 0.0127% |
1976 | * | * | * | 719 | 204 | 0.0130% |
1975 | * | * | * | 667 | 229 | 0.0147% |
1974 | * | * | * | 660 | 231 | 0.0148% |
1973 | * | * | * | 533 | 314 | 0.0202% |
1972 | * | * | * | 509 | 339 | 0.0210% |
1971 | * | * | * | 462 | 437 | 0.0250% |
1970 | * | * | * | 416 | 543 | 0.0297% |
1969 | * | * | * | 383 | 601 | 0.0341% |
1968 | * | * | * | 358 | 621 | 0.0363% |
1967 | * | * | * | 349 | 659 | 0.0384% |
1966 | * | * | * | 285 | 878 | 0.0500% |
1965 | * | * | * | 284 | 942 | 0.0516% |
1964 | * | * | * | 265 | 1,144 | 0.0585% |
1963 | * | * | * | 239 | 1,318 | 0.0663% |
1962 | * | * | * | 228 | 1,403 | 0.0692% |
1961 | * | * | * | 219 | 1,535 | 0.0740% |
1960 | * | * | * | 199 | 1,788 | 0.0860% |
1959 | * | * | * | 183 | 1,960 | 0.0943% |
1958 | * | * | * | 182 | 2,009 | 0.0973% |
1957 | * | * | * | 166 | 2,315 | 0.1104% |
1956 | * | * | * | 165 | 2,236 | 0.1086% |
1955 | * | * | * | 147 | 2,429 | 0.1212% |
1954 | * | * | * | 138 | 2,691 | 0.1352% |
1953 | * | * | * | 125 | 2,961 | 0.1536% |
1952 | * | * | * | 122 | 2,983 | 0.1568% |
1951 | * | * | * | 117 | 3,007 | 0.1631% |
1950 | * | * | * | 109 | 3,250 | 0.1849% |
1949 | * | * | * | 104 | 3,425 | 0.1952% |
1948 | * | * | * | 99 | 3,677 | 0.2112% |
1947 | * | * | * | 99 | 4,046 | 0.2228% |
1946 | * | * | * | 91 | 3,906 | 0.2426% |
1945 | * | * | * | 78 | 3,517 | 0.2613% |
1944 | * | * | * | 69 | 3,841 | 0.2814% |
1943 | * | * | * | 70 | 4,026 | 0.2812% |
1942 | * | * | * | 61 | 4,335 | 0.3115% |
1941 | * | * | * | 62 | 3,910 | 0.3141% |
1940 | * | * | * | 59 | 3,923 | 0.3321% |
1939 | * | * | * | 59 | 3,952 | 0.3485% |
1938 | * | * | * | 59 | 4,065 | 0.3562% |
1937 | * | * | * | 49 | 4,380 | 0.3977% |
1936 | 888 | 48 | 0.0045% | 46 | 4,343 | 0.4032% |
1935 | 964 | 44 | 0.0041% | 44 | 4,570 | 0.4207% |
1934 | 892 | 50 | 0.0047% | 40 | 4,974 | 0.4598% |
1933 | * | * | * | 39 | 5,074 | 0.4854% |
1932 | 910 | 51 | 0.0048% | 36 | 5,646 | 0.5105% |
1931 | * | * | * | 33 | 5,882 | 0.5336% |
1930 | 934 | 52 | 0.0046% | 31 | 6,944 | 0.5958% |
1929 | 875 | 58 | 0.0052% | 31 | 6,896 | 0.5961% |
1928 | 879 | 58 | 0.0051% | 31 | 7,040 | 0.5895% |
1927 | 917 | 56 | 0.0048% | 27 | 7,689 | 0.6222% |
1926 | 937 | 53 | 0.0046% | 27 | 7,955 | 0.6473% |
1925 | * | * | * | 26 | 8,280 | 0.6559% |
1924 | 925 | 58 | 0.0050% | 24 | 8,859 | 0.6837% |
1923 | * | * | * | 22 | 8,876 | 0.7089% |
1922 | * | * | * | 22 | 8,902 | 0.7138% |
1921 | * | * | * | 22 | 9,175 | 0.7176% |
1920 | * | * | * | 19 | 9,182 | 0.7384% |
1919 | * | * | * | 20 | 8,803 | 0.7495% |
1918 | * | * | * | 18 | 9,117 | 0.7582% |
1917 | 927 | 48 | 0.0050% | 19 | 8,583 | 0.7642% |
1916 | * | * | * | 19 | 8,619 | 0.7944% |
1915 | * | * | * | 18 | 8,304 | 0.8116% |
1914 | * | * | * | 17 | 6,634 | 0.8347% |
1913 | 982 | 26 | 0.0049% | 17 | 5,564 | 0.8520% |
1912 | 774 | 32 | 0.0071% | 17 | 5,100 | 0.8716% |
1911 | 781 | 18 | 0.0075% | 19 | 3,723 | 0.8453% |
1910 | 528 | 29 | 0.0139% | 20 | 3,444 | 0.8228% |
1909 | 991 | 10 | 0.0057% | 19 | 3,015 | 0.8206% |
1908 | 728 | 14 | 0.0084% | 18 | 2,932 | 0.8281% |
1907 | 971 | 9 | 0.0057% | 21 | 2,618 | 0.7765% |
1906 | 734 | 12 | 0.0083% | 24 | 2,303 | 0.7352% |
1905 | 654 | 14 | 0.0098% | 23 | 2,365 | 0.7634% |
1904 | 791 | 10 | 0.0072% | 28 | 2,136 | 0.7305% |
1903 | 762 | 10 | 0.0077% | 31 | 1,934 | 0.6953% |
1902 | 837 | 9 | 0.0068% | 36 | 1,832 | 0.6535% |
1901 | * | * | * | 36 | 1,639 | 0.6447% |
1900 | 668 | 15 | 0.0092% | 35 | 2,072 | 0.6514% |
1899 | 643 | 11 | 0.0095% | 40 | 1,536 | 0.6206% |
1898 | 855 | 8 | 0.0061% | 42 | 1,693 | 0.6175% |
1897 | * | * | * | 41 | 1,562 | 0.6291% |
1896 | 616 | 13 | 0.0101% | 42 | 1,531 | 0.6075% |
1895 | 729 | 10 | 0.0079% | 37 | 1,582 | 0.6402% |
1894 | 705 | 10 | 0.0080% | 37 | 1,571 | 0.6657% |
1893 | 593 | 12 | 0.0099% | 37 | 1,448 | 0.6429% |
1892 | 915 | 7 | 0.0053% | 38 | 1,447 | 0.6433% |
1891 | * | * | * | 37 | 1,333 | 0.6781% |
1890 | 711 | 9 | 0.0075% | 31 | 1,472 | 0.7299% |
1889 | 941 | 6 | 0.0050% | 38 | 1,283 | 0.6780% |
1888 | 734 | 9 | 0.0069% | 33 | 1,334 | 0.7041% |
1887 | 533 | 12 | 0.0110% | 35 | 1,087 | 0.6993% |
1886 | * | * | * | 37 | 1,061 | 0.6901% |
1885 | * | * | * | 39 | 956 | 0.6734% |
1884 | * | * | * | 35 | 962 | 0.6991% |
1883 | 771 | 7 | 0.0062% | 38 | 847 | 0.7054% |
1882 | 803 | 7 | 0.0057% | 34 | 812 | 0.7018% |
1881 | 957 | 5 | 0.0046% | 42 | 617 | 0.6241% |
1880 | * | * | * | 37 | 635 | 0.6505% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |