Lonnie: Statistics About The Baby Name Lonnie
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
2002 | 906 | 177 | 0.0086% | * | * | * |
2001 | 889 | 177 | 0.0086% | * | * | * |
2000 | 829 | 193 | 0.0093% | * | * | * |
1999 | 776 | 205 | 0.0101% | * | * | * |
1998 | 792 | 193 | 0.0095% | * | * | * |
1997 | 712 | 222 | 0.0111% | * | * | * |
1996 | 672 | 245 | 0.0122% | * | * | * |
1995 | 636 | 266 | 0.0132% | * | * | * |
1994 | 576 | 321 | 0.0158% | * | * | * |
1993 | 577 | 315 | 0.0153% | * | * | * |
1992 | 540 | 354 | 0.0169% | * | * | * |
1991 | 497 | 394 | 0.0186% | * | * | * |
1990 | 509 | 376 | 0.0175% | * | * | * |
1989 | 461 | 417 | 0.0199% | * | * | * |
1988 | 443 | 414 | 0.0207% | * | * | * |
1987 | 446 | 398 | 0.0204% | * | * | * |
1986 | 415 | 421 | 0.0220% | * | * | * |
1985 | 381 | 473 | 0.0246% | * | * | * |
1984 | 359 | 504 | 0.0269% | * | * | * |
1983 | 348 | 520 | 0.0280% | * | * | * |
1982 | 303 | 650 | 0.0345% | * | * | * |
1981 | 301 | 639 | 0.0344% | * | * | * |
1980 | 295 | 693 | 0.0375% | * | * | * |
1979 | 279 | 734 | 0.0411% | * | * | * |
1978 | 277 | 700 | 0.0411% | * | * | * |
1977 | 242 | 847 | 0.0496% | * | * | * |
1976 | 241 | 833 | 0.0511% | * | * | * |
1975 | 236 | 871 | 0.0538% | * | * | * |
1974 | 227 | 921 | 0.0566% | * | * | * |
1973 | 221 | 982 | 0.0609% | * | * | * |
1972 | 207 | 1,099 | 0.0657% | * | * | * |
1971 | 195 | 1,270 | 0.0700% | * | * | * |
1970 | 194 | 1,382 | 0.0727% | * | * | * |
1969 | 192 | 1,388 | 0.0759% | * | * | * |
1968 | 180 | 1,449 | 0.0817% | * | * | * |
1967 | 185 | 1,320 | 0.0742% | * | * | * |
1966 | 178 | 1,429 | 0.0787% | * | * | * |
1965 | 176 | 1,497 | 0.0790% | * | * | * |
1964 | 171 | 1,602 | 0.0791% | * | * | * |
1963 | 188 | 1,579 | 0.0765% | * | * | * |
1962 | 194 | 1,566 | 0.0746% | * | * | * |
1961 | 191 | 1,588 | 0.0738% | * | * | * |
1960 | 183 | 1,704 | 0.0787% | * | * | * |
1959 | 173 | 1,774 | 0.0819% | * | * | * |
1958 | 171 | 1,770 | 0.0823% | 989 | 110 | 0.0053% |
1957 | 157 | 2,045 | 0.0936% | 953 | 117 | 0.0056% |
1956 | 157 | 2,002 | 0.0935% | 932 | 118 | 0.0057% |
1955 | 154 | 1,864 | 0.0893% | 988 | 103 | 0.0051% |
1954 | 146 | 1,956 | 0.0947% | 949 | 104 | 0.0052% |
1953 | 147 | 1,917 | 0.0960% | 812 | 129 | 0.0067% |
1952 | 148 | 1,883 | 0.0954% | 829 | 122 | 0.0064% |
1951 | 139 | 1,935 | 0.1017% | 823 | 119 | 0.0065% |
1950 | 135 | 1,996 | 0.1098% | 757 | 131 | 0.0075% |
1949 | 134 | 2,021 | 0.1125% | 838 | 111 | 0.0063% |
1948 | 135 | 2,027 | 0.1140% | 718 | 137 | 0.0079% |
1947 | 138 | 2,067 | 0.1116% | 684 | 151 | 0.0083% |
1946 | 136 | 1,777 | 0.1081% | 667 | 143 | 0.0089% |
1945 | 143 | 1,456 | 0.1063% | 637 | 132 | 0.0098% |
1944 | 147 | 1,438 | 0.1039% | 681 | 120 | 0.0088% |
1943 | 144 | 1,453 | 0.1004% | 724 | 114 | 0.0080% |
1942 | 148 | 1,325 | 0.0941% | 820 | 88 | 0.0063% |
1941 | 147 | 1,202 | 0.0960% | 715 | 97 | 0.0078% |
1940 | 154 | 1,104 | 0.0931% | 686 | 103 | 0.0087% |
1939 | 151 | 1,067 | 0.0941% | 732 | 87 | 0.0077% |
1938 | 160 | 995 | 0.0876% | 753 | 85 | 0.0074% |
1937 | 171 | 854 | 0.0782% | 801 | 74 | 0.0067% |
1936 | 177 | 747 | 0.0703% | 759 | 79 | 0.0073% |
1935 | 179 | 752 | 0.0704% | 836 | 68 | 0.0063% |
1934 | 180 | 756 | 0.0713% | 779 | 75 | 0.0069% |
1933 | 176 | 735 | 0.0722% | 795 | 70 | 0.0067% |
1932 | 180 | 755 | 0.0704% | 870 | 64 | 0.0058% |
1931 | 183 | 716 | 0.0671% | 753 | 79 | 0.0072% |
1930 | 194 | 716 | 0.0635% | 875 | 68 | 0.0058% |
1929 | 190 | 720 | 0.0651% | 744 | 89 | 0.0077% |
1928 | 197 | 701 | 0.0615% | 876 | 70 | 0.0059% |
1927 | 199 | 714 | 0.0616% | 787 | 86 | 0.0070% |
1926 | 208 | 656 | 0.0573% | 916 | 67 | 0.0055% |
1925 | 199 | 702 | 0.0610% | 756 | 96 | 0.0076% |
1924 | 196 | 715 | 0.0612% | 787 | 90 | 0.0069% |
1923 | 201 | 671 | 0.0593% | 888 | 69 | 0.0055% |
1922 | 194 | 710 | 0.0631% | 765 | 92 | 0.0074% |
1921 | 209 | 641 | 0.0564% | 888 | 70 | 0.0055% |
1920 | 187 | 739 | 0.0671% | 757 | 93 | 0.0075% |
1919 | 210 | 592 | 0.0583% | 798 | 78 | 0.0066% |
1918 | 193 | 660 | 0.0628% | 784 | 84 | 0.0070% |
1917 | 198 | 594 | 0.0619% | 849 | 66 | 0.0059% |
1916 | 202 | 570 | 0.0617% | 909 | 56 | 0.0052% |
1915 | 199 | 544 | 0.0617% | 862 | 58 | 0.0057% |
1914 | 185 | 471 | 0.0690% | 821 | 51 | 0.0064% |
1913 | 192 | 350 | 0.0653% | 769 | 47 | 0.0072% |
1912 | 179 | 326 | 0.0723% | 766 | 43 | 0.0073% |
1911 | 157 | 214 | 0.0888% | 796 | 30 | 0.0068% |
1910 | 147 | 217 | 0.1042% | 650 | 43 | 0.0103% |
1909 | 128 | 209 | 0.1183% | 678 | 35 | 0.0095% |
1908 | 142 | 169 | 0.1016% | 842 | 22 | 0.0062% |
1907 | 132 | 181 | 0.1142% | 684 | 31 | 0.0092% |
1906 | 132 | 156 | 0.1083% | 532 | 43 | 0.0137% |
1905 | 120 | 179 | 0.1249% | 592 | 35 | 0.0113% |
1904 | 147 | 133 | 0.0960% | 898 | 17 | 0.0058% |
1903 | 129 | 145 | 0.1121% | 602 | 30 | 0.0108% |
1902 | 138 | 138 | 0.1039% | 680 | 25 | 0.0089% |
1901 | 114 | 148 | 0.1280% | 713 | 21 | 0.0083% |
1900 | 125 | 186 | 0.1144% | 619 | 33 | 0.0104% |
1899 | 135 | 119 | 0.1033% | 623 | 25 | 0.0101% |
1898 | 138 | 129 | 0.0976% | 656 | 25 | 0.0091% |
1897 | 142 | 114 | 0.0935% | 605 | 26 | 0.0105% |
1896 | 114 | 159 | 0.1232% | * | * | * |
1895 | 135 | 120 | 0.0947% | 652 | 23 | 0.0093% |
1894 | 117 | 138 | 0.1105% | 619 | 23 | 0.0097% |
1893 | 131 | 114 | 0.0942% | 541 | 27 | 0.0120% |
1892 | 134 | 120 | 0.0913% | 882 | 12 | 0.0053% |
1891 | 118 | 117 | 0.1071% | 656 | 17 | 0.0086% |
1890 | 135 | 107 | 0.0894% | 681 | 16 | 0.0079% |
1889 | 136 | 106 | 0.0890% | 525 | 24 | 0.0127% |
1888 | 150 | 101 | 0.0777% | 819 | 11 | 0.0058% |
1887 | 166 | 76 | 0.0695% | 602 | 15 | 0.0097% |
1886 | 158 | 88 | 0.0739% | 593 | 15 | 0.0098% |
1885 | 177 | 74 | 0.0638% | 565 | 15 | 0.0106% |
1884 | 158 | 88 | 0.0717% | * | * | * |
1883 | 142 | 91 | 0.0809% | 674 | 9 | 0.0075% |
1882 | 173 | 78 | 0.0639% | 520 | 13 | 0.0112% |
1881 | 158 | 77 | 0.0711% | 902 | 5 | 0.0051% |
1880 | 223 | 53 | 0.0448% | 482 | 13 | 0.0133% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |