
Lois: Statistics About The Baby Name Lois
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls | 
| 1983 | * | * | * | 983 | 148 | 0.0083% | 
| 1982 | * | * | * | 883 | 174 | 0.0096% | 
| 1981 | * | * | * | 839 | 186 | 0.0104% | 
| 1980 | * | * | * | 957 | 155 | 0.0087% | 
| 1979 | * | * | * | 877 | 175 | 0.0102% | 
| 1978 | * | * | * | 769 | 201 | 0.0122% | 
| 1977 | * | * | * | 819 | 183 | 0.0111% | 
| 1976 | * | * | * | 763 | 189 | 0.0120% | 
| 1975 | * | * | * | 676 | 222 | 0.0142% | 
| 1974 | * | * | * | 565 | 285 | 0.0182% | 
| 1973 | * | * | * | 540 | 311 | 0.0200% | 
| 1972 | * | * | * | 505 | 343 | 0.0213% | 
| 1971 | * | * | * | 447 | 460 | 0.0263% | 
| 1970 | * | * | * | 427 | 517 | 0.0282% | 
| 1969 | * | * | * | 399 | 568 | 0.0322% | 
| 1968 | * | * | * | 341 | 668 | 0.0391% | 
| 1967 | * | * | * | 315 | 758 | 0.0442% | 
| 1966 | * | * | * | 278 | 920 | 0.0524% | 
| 1965 | * | * | * | 248 | 1,207 | 0.0661% | 
| 1964 | * | * | * | 231 | 1,414 | 0.0723% | 
| 1963 | * | * | * | 217 | 1,580 | 0.0795% | 
| 1962 | * | * | * | 201 | 1,785 | 0.0881% | 
| 1961 | * | * | * | 183 | 2,097 | 0.1011% | 
| 1960 | * | * | * | 175 | 2,272 | 0.1093% | 
| 1959 | * | * | * | 162 | 2,486 | 0.1196% | 
| 1958 | * | * | * | 154 | 2,622 | 0.1270% | 
| 1957 | * | * | * | 145 | 2,874 | 0.1371% | 
| 1956 | * | * | * | 135 | 3,222 | 0.1565% | 
| 1955 | * | * | * | 124 | 3,418 | 0.1706% | 
| 1954 | * | * | * | 109 | 3,956 | 0.1988% | 
| 1953 | * | * | * | 91 | 4,216 | 0.2187% | 
| 1952 | * | * | * | 86 | 4,361 | 0.2293% | 
| 1951 | * | * | * | 85 | 4,523 | 0.2454% | 
| 1950 | * | * | * | 83 | 4,507 | 0.2564% | 
| 1949 | * | * | * | 73 | 4,914 | 0.2801% | 
| 1948 | * | * | * | 70 | 5,073 | 0.2914% | 
| 1947 | * | * | * | 64 | 5,697 | 0.3137% | 
| 1946 | * | * | * | 55 | 5,700 | 0.3541% | 
| 1945 | * | * | * | 48 | 5,144 | 0.3822% | 
| 1944 | * | * | * | 47 | 5,530 | 0.4051% | 
| 1943 | * | * | * | 43 | 6,106 | 0.4264% | 
| 1942 | 933 | 51 | 0.0036% | 44 | 6,427 | 0.4618% | 
| 1941 | * | * | * | 43 | 6,094 | 0.4896% | 
| 1940 | * | * | * | 38 | 6,130 | 0.5190% | 
| 1939 | 853 | 52 | 0.0046% | 35 | 6,038 | 0.5325% | 
| 1938 | 866 | 52 | 0.0046% | 33 | 6,503 | 0.5699% | 
| 1937 | 949 | 44 | 0.0040% | 29 | 6,934 | 0.6296% | 
| 1936 | * | * | * | 26 | 7,219 | 0.6703% | 
| 1935 | 835 | 56 | 0.0052% | 21 | 7,986 | 0.7352% | 
| 1934 | 787 | 62 | 0.0058% | 20 | 8,382 | 0.7749% | 
| 1933 | 680 | 76 | 0.0075% | 19 | 8,648 | 0.8274% | 
| 1932 | 631 | 90 | 0.0084% | 20 | 9,520 | 0.8608% | 
| 1931 | 693 | 76 | 0.0071% | 20 | 9,341 | 0.8473% | 
| 1930 | 671 | 87 | 0.0077% | 17 | 10,102 | 0.8668% | 
| 1929 | 705 | 78 | 0.0071% | 17 | 10,280 | 0.8886% | 
| 1928 | 739 | 76 | 0.0067% | 18 | 10,417 | 0.8723% | 
| 1927 | 721 | 81 | 0.0070% | 19 | 10,505 | 0.8501% | 
| 1926 | 898 | 56 | 0.0049% | 19 | 9,807 | 0.7979% | 
| 1925 | 814 | 67 | 0.0058% | 18 | 9,565 | 0.7577% | 
| 1924 | 784 | 74 | 0.0063% | 22 | 9,307 | 0.7183% | 
| 1923 | 766 | 74 | 0.0065% | 27 | 7,806 | 0.6234% | 
| 1922 | 881 | 62 | 0.0055% | 35 | 6,951 | 0.5573% | 
| 1921 | 793 | 73 | 0.0064% | 38 | 6,896 | 0.5393% | 
| 1920 | 919 | 57 | 0.0052% | 38 | 6,559 | 0.5275% | 
| 1919 | 734 | 76 | 0.0075% | 40 | 5,976 | 0.5088% | 
| 1918 | 836 | 62 | 0.0059% | 42 | 5,873 | 0.4884% | 
| 1917 | 833 | 59 | 0.0062% | 43 | 5,486 | 0.4885% | 
| 1916 | 706 | 72 | 0.0078% | 43 | 5,150 | 0.4747% | 
| 1915 | 728 | 67 | 0.0076% | 47 | 4,774 | 0.4666% | 
| 1914 | 672 | 58 | 0.0085% | 51 | 3,416 | 0.4298% | 
| 1913 | 656 | 47 | 0.0088% | 59 | 2,552 | 0.3908% | 
| 1912 | 810 | 30 | 0.0067% | 63 | 2,143 | 0.3662% | 
| 1911 | * | * | * | 67 | 1,503 | 0.3413% | 
| 1910 | 806 | 15 | 0.0072% | 76 | 1,269 | 0.3032% | 
| 1909 | 566 | 22 | 0.0125% | 73 | 1,156 | 0.3146% | 
| 1908 | 669 | 16 | 0.0096% | 80 | 1,024 | 0.2892% | 
| 1907 | 763 | 13 | 0.0082% | 85 | 896 | 0.2657% | 
| 1906 | 604 | 16 | 0.0111% | 88 | 799 | 0.2551% | 
| 1905 | 975 | 8 | 0.0056% | 88 | 762 | 0.2460% | 
| 1904 | 931 | 8 | 0.0058% | 90 | 727 | 0.2486% | 
| 1903 | 884 | 8 | 0.0062% | 92 | 664 | 0.2387% | 
| 1902 | 986 | 7 | 0.0053% | 98 | 594 | 0.2119% | 
| 1901 | * | * | * | 109 | 488 | 0.1920% | 
| 1900 | 883 | 10 | 0.0062% | 115 | 577 | 0.1814% | 
| 1899 | 832 | 8 | 0.0069% | 117 | 416 | 0.1681% | 
| 1898 | 853 | 8 | 0.0061% | 114 | 466 | 0.1700% | 
| 1897 | * | * | * | 111 | 457 | 0.1841% | 
| 1896 | * | * | * | 123 | 388 | 0.1540% | 
| 1895 | * | * | * | 144 | 311 | 0.1259% | 
| 1894 | 917 | 7 | 0.0056% | 140 | 308 | 0.1305% | 
| 1893 | * | * | * | 152 | 260 | 0.1154% | 
| 1892 | * | * | * | 160 | 242 | 0.1076% | 
| 1891 | * | * | * | 162 | 206 | 0.1048% | 
| 1890 | * | * | * | 178 | 175 | 0.0868% | 
| 1889 | * | * | * | 185 | 154 | 0.0814% | 
| 1888 | * | * | * | 204 | 121 | 0.0639% | 
| 1887 | * | * | * | 176 | 129 | 0.0830% | 
| 1886 | * | * | * | 187 | 116 | 0.0754% | 
| 1885 | * | * | * | 183 | 105 | 0.0740% | 
| 1884 | * | * | * | 207 | 84 | 0.0610% | 
| 1883 | * | * | * | 195 | 76 | 0.0633% | 
| 1882 | * | * | * | 207 | 65 | 0.0562% | 
| 1881 | * | * | * | 205 | 53 | 0.0536% | 
| 1880 | * | * | * | 211 | 53 | 0.0543% | 
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
