Lois: Statistics About The Baby Name Lois
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1983 | * | * | * | 983 | 148 | 0.0083% |
1982 | * | * | * | 883 | 174 | 0.0096% |
1981 | * | * | * | 839 | 186 | 0.0104% |
1980 | * | * | * | 957 | 155 | 0.0087% |
1979 | * | * | * | 877 | 175 | 0.0102% |
1978 | * | * | * | 769 | 201 | 0.0122% |
1977 | * | * | * | 819 | 183 | 0.0111% |
1976 | * | * | * | 763 | 189 | 0.0120% |
1975 | * | * | * | 676 | 222 | 0.0142% |
1974 | * | * | * | 565 | 285 | 0.0182% |
1973 | * | * | * | 540 | 311 | 0.0200% |
1972 | * | * | * | 505 | 343 | 0.0213% |
1971 | * | * | * | 447 | 460 | 0.0263% |
1970 | * | * | * | 427 | 517 | 0.0282% |
1969 | * | * | * | 399 | 568 | 0.0322% |
1968 | * | * | * | 341 | 668 | 0.0391% |
1967 | * | * | * | 315 | 758 | 0.0442% |
1966 | * | * | * | 278 | 920 | 0.0524% |
1965 | * | * | * | 248 | 1,207 | 0.0661% |
1964 | * | * | * | 231 | 1,414 | 0.0723% |
1963 | * | * | * | 217 | 1,580 | 0.0795% |
1962 | * | * | * | 201 | 1,785 | 0.0881% |
1961 | * | * | * | 183 | 2,097 | 0.1011% |
1960 | * | * | * | 175 | 2,272 | 0.1093% |
1959 | * | * | * | 162 | 2,486 | 0.1196% |
1958 | * | * | * | 154 | 2,622 | 0.1270% |
1957 | * | * | * | 145 | 2,874 | 0.1371% |
1956 | * | * | * | 135 | 3,222 | 0.1565% |
1955 | * | * | * | 124 | 3,418 | 0.1706% |
1954 | * | * | * | 109 | 3,956 | 0.1988% |
1953 | * | * | * | 91 | 4,216 | 0.2187% |
1952 | * | * | * | 86 | 4,361 | 0.2293% |
1951 | * | * | * | 85 | 4,523 | 0.2454% |
1950 | * | * | * | 83 | 4,507 | 0.2564% |
1949 | * | * | * | 73 | 4,914 | 0.2801% |
1948 | * | * | * | 70 | 5,073 | 0.2914% |
1947 | * | * | * | 64 | 5,697 | 0.3137% |
1946 | * | * | * | 55 | 5,700 | 0.3541% |
1945 | * | * | * | 48 | 5,144 | 0.3822% |
1944 | * | * | * | 47 | 5,530 | 0.4051% |
1943 | * | * | * | 43 | 6,106 | 0.4264% |
1942 | 933 | 51 | 0.0036% | 44 | 6,427 | 0.4618% |
1941 | * | * | * | 43 | 6,094 | 0.4896% |
1940 | * | * | * | 38 | 6,130 | 0.5190% |
1939 | 853 | 52 | 0.0046% | 35 | 6,038 | 0.5325% |
1938 | 866 | 52 | 0.0046% | 33 | 6,503 | 0.5699% |
1937 | 949 | 44 | 0.0040% | 29 | 6,934 | 0.6296% |
1936 | * | * | * | 26 | 7,219 | 0.6703% |
1935 | 835 | 56 | 0.0052% | 21 | 7,986 | 0.7352% |
1934 | 787 | 62 | 0.0058% | 20 | 8,382 | 0.7749% |
1933 | 680 | 76 | 0.0075% | 19 | 8,648 | 0.8274% |
1932 | 631 | 90 | 0.0084% | 20 | 9,520 | 0.8608% |
1931 | 693 | 76 | 0.0071% | 20 | 9,341 | 0.8473% |
1930 | 671 | 87 | 0.0077% | 17 | 10,102 | 0.8668% |
1929 | 705 | 78 | 0.0071% | 17 | 10,280 | 0.8886% |
1928 | 739 | 76 | 0.0067% | 18 | 10,417 | 0.8723% |
1927 | 721 | 81 | 0.0070% | 19 | 10,505 | 0.8501% |
1926 | 898 | 56 | 0.0049% | 19 | 9,807 | 0.7979% |
1925 | 814 | 67 | 0.0058% | 18 | 9,565 | 0.7577% |
1924 | 784 | 74 | 0.0063% | 22 | 9,307 | 0.7183% |
1923 | 766 | 74 | 0.0065% | 27 | 7,806 | 0.6234% |
1922 | 881 | 62 | 0.0055% | 35 | 6,951 | 0.5573% |
1921 | 793 | 73 | 0.0064% | 38 | 6,896 | 0.5393% |
1920 | 919 | 57 | 0.0052% | 38 | 6,559 | 0.5275% |
1919 | 734 | 76 | 0.0075% | 40 | 5,976 | 0.5088% |
1918 | 836 | 62 | 0.0059% | 42 | 5,873 | 0.4884% |
1917 | 833 | 59 | 0.0062% | 43 | 5,486 | 0.4885% |
1916 | 706 | 72 | 0.0078% | 43 | 5,150 | 0.4747% |
1915 | 728 | 67 | 0.0076% | 47 | 4,774 | 0.4666% |
1914 | 672 | 58 | 0.0085% | 51 | 3,416 | 0.4298% |
1913 | 656 | 47 | 0.0088% | 59 | 2,552 | 0.3908% |
1912 | 810 | 30 | 0.0067% | 63 | 2,143 | 0.3662% |
1911 | * | * | * | 67 | 1,503 | 0.3413% |
1910 | 806 | 15 | 0.0072% | 76 | 1,269 | 0.3032% |
1909 | 566 | 22 | 0.0125% | 73 | 1,156 | 0.3146% |
1908 | 669 | 16 | 0.0096% | 80 | 1,024 | 0.2892% |
1907 | 763 | 13 | 0.0082% | 85 | 896 | 0.2657% |
1906 | 604 | 16 | 0.0111% | 88 | 799 | 0.2551% |
1905 | 975 | 8 | 0.0056% | 88 | 762 | 0.2460% |
1904 | 931 | 8 | 0.0058% | 90 | 727 | 0.2486% |
1903 | 884 | 8 | 0.0062% | 92 | 664 | 0.2387% |
1902 | 986 | 7 | 0.0053% | 98 | 594 | 0.2119% |
1901 | * | * | * | 109 | 488 | 0.1920% |
1900 | 883 | 10 | 0.0062% | 115 | 577 | 0.1814% |
1899 | 832 | 8 | 0.0069% | 117 | 416 | 0.1681% |
1898 | 853 | 8 | 0.0061% | 114 | 466 | 0.1700% |
1897 | * | * | * | 111 | 457 | 0.1841% |
1896 | * | * | * | 123 | 388 | 0.1540% |
1895 | * | * | * | 144 | 311 | 0.1259% |
1894 | 917 | 7 | 0.0056% | 140 | 308 | 0.1305% |
1893 | * | * | * | 152 | 260 | 0.1154% |
1892 | * | * | * | 160 | 242 | 0.1076% |
1891 | * | * | * | 162 | 206 | 0.1048% |
1890 | * | * | * | 178 | 175 | 0.0868% |
1889 | * | * | * | 185 | 154 | 0.0814% |
1888 | * | * | * | 204 | 121 | 0.0639% |
1887 | * | * | * | 176 | 129 | 0.0830% |
1886 | * | * | * | 187 | 116 | 0.0754% |
1885 | * | * | * | 183 | 105 | 0.0740% |
1884 | * | * | * | 207 | 84 | 0.0610% |
1883 | * | * | * | 195 | 76 | 0.0633% |
1882 | * | * | * | 207 | 65 | 0.0562% |
1881 | * | * | * | 205 | 53 | 0.0536% |
1880 | * | * | * | 211 | 53 | 0.0543% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |