Leonel: Statistics About The Baby Name Leonel
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
2022 | 327 | 1,028 | 0.0552% | - | - | - |
2021 | 374 | 862 | 0.0463% | - | - | - |
2020 | 344 | 929 | 0.0504% | - | - | - |
2019 | 343 | 970 | 0.0508% | - | - | - |
2018 | 357 | 921 | 0.0477% | - | - | - |
2017 | 363 | 898 | 0.0457% | - | - | - |
2016 | 373 | 888 | 0.0440% | - | - | - |
2015 | 389 | 815 | 0.0402% | - | - | - |
2014 | 430 | 704 | 0.0347% | - | - | - |
2013 | 461 | 606 | 0.0303% | - | - | - |
2012 | 443 | 616 | 0.0307% | - | - | - |
2011 | 459 | 578 | 0.0287% | - | - | - |
2010 | 448 | 591 | 0.0291% | - | - | - |
2009 | 470 | 576 | 0.0275% | - | - | - |
2008 | 486 | 562 | 0.0261% | - | - | - |
2007 | 485 | 545 | 0.0250% | - | - | - |
2006 | 468 | 569 | 0.0264% | - | - | - |
2005 | 421 | 625 | 0.0299% | - | - | - |
2004 | 473 | 526 | 0.0253% | - | - | - |
2003 | 524 | 446 | 0.0214% | - | - | - |
2002 | 542 | 407 | 0.0198% | - | - | - |
2001 | 532 | 409 | 0.0198% | - | - | - |
2000 | 524 | 421 | 0.0202% | - | - | - |
1999 | 544 | 372 | 0.0183% | - | - | - |
1998 | 560 | 351 | 0.0173% | - | - | - |
1997 | 592 | 303 | 0.0152% | - | - | - |
1996 | 562 | 326 | 0.0163% | - | - | - |
1995 | 593 | 300 | 0.0149% | - | - | - |
1994 | 578 | 319 | 0.0157% | - | - | - |
1993 | 569 | 325 | 0.0158% | - | - | - |
1992 | 570 | 319 | 0.0152% | - | - | - |
1991 | 576 | 306 | 0.0145% | - | - | - |
1990 | 614 | 269 | 0.0125% | - | - | - |
1989 | 622 | 253 | 0.0121% | - | - | - |
1988 | 641 | 218 | 0.0109% | - | - | - |
1987 | 642 | 204 | 0.0105% | - | - | - |
1986 | 624 | 203 | 0.0106% | - | - | - |
1985 | 647 | 182 | 0.0095% | - | - | - |
1984 | 670 | 168 | 0.0090% | - | - | - |
1983 | 704 | 148 | 0.0080% | - | - | - |
1982 | 656 | 175 | 0.0093% | - | - | - |
1981 | 654 | 171 | 0.0092% | - | - | - |
1980 | 699 | 155 | 0.0084% | - | - | - |
1979 | 736 | 139 | 0.0078% | - | - | - |
1978 | 748 | 129 | 0.0076% | - | - | - |
1977 | 858 | 99 | 0.0058% | - | - | - |
1976 | 767 | 117 | 0.0072% | - | - | - |
1975 | 747 | 124 | 0.0077% | - | - | - |
1974 | 801 | 100 | 0.0061% | - | - | - |
1973 | 782 | 104 | 0.0065% | - | - | - |
1972 | 862 | 87 | 0.0052% | - | - | - |
1971 | 831 | 95 | 0.0052% | - | - | - |
1970 | 853 | 90 | 0.0047% | - | - | - |
1969 | 909 | 71 | 0.0039% | - | - | - |
1968 | 896 | 65 | 0.0037% | - | - | - |
1967 | 870 | 68 | 0.0038% | - | - | - |
1966 | 927 | 62 | 0.0034% | - | - | - |
1965 | 887 | 69 | 0.0036% | - | - | - |
1964 | 883 | 75 | 0.0037% | - | - | - |
1963 | 994 | 58 | 0.0028% | - | - | - |
1960 | 947 | 64 | 0.0030% | - | - | - |
1958 | 973 | 61 | 0.0028% | - | - | - |
1950 | 985 | 50 | 0.0027% | - | - | - |
1949 | 901 | 59 | 0.0033% | - | - | - |
1947 | 959 | 55 | 0.0030% | - | - | - |
1939 | 928 | 46 | 0.0041% | - | - | - |