Lemuel: Statistics About The Baby Name Lemuel
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1976 | 985 | 72 | 0.0044% | * | * | * |
1975 | 978 | 71 | 0.0044% | * | * | * |
1972 | 970 | 70 | 0.0042% | * | * | * |
1970 | 944 | 72 | 0.0038% | * | * | * |
1969 | 902 | 72 | 0.0039% | * | * | * |
1968 | 834 | 77 | 0.0043% | * | * | * |
1967 | 792 | 85 | 0.0048% | * | * | * |
1966 | 799 | 83 | 0.0046% | * | * | * |
1965 | 806 | 85 | 0.0045% | * | * | * |
1964 | 784 | 92 | 0.0045% | * | * | * |
1963 | 757 | 104 | 0.0050% | * | * | * |
1962 | 789 | 94 | 0.0045% | * | * | * |
1961 | 786 | 94 | 0.0044% | * | * | * |
1960 | 793 | 94 | 0.0043% | * | * | * |
1959 | 750 | 104 | 0.0048% | * | * | * |
1958 | 865 | 76 | 0.0035% | * | * | * |
1957 | 729 | 106 | 0.0049% | * | * | * |
1956 | 736 | 99 | 0.0046% | * | * | * |
1955 | 742 | 96 | 0.0046% | * | * | * |
1954 | 704 | 106 | 0.0051% | * | * | * |
1953 | 691 | 107 | 0.0054% | * | * | * |
1952 | 682 | 104 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
1951 | 651 | 116 | 0.0061% | * | * | * |
1950 | 739 | 86 | 0.0047% | * | * | * |
1949 | 697 | 96 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
1948 | 704 | 90 | 0.0051% | * | * | * |
1947 | 750 | 84 | 0.0045% | * | * | * |
1946 | 708 | 85 | 0.0052% | * | * | * |
1945 | 708 | 74 | 0.0054% | * | * | * |
1944 | 611 | 101 | 0.0073% | * | * | * |
1943 | 660 | 94 | 0.0065% | * | * | * |
1942 | 693 | 86 | 0.0061% | * | * | * |
1941 | 695 | 78 | 0.0062% | * | * | * |
1940 | 706 | 74 | 0.0062% | * | * | * |
1939 | 671 | 79 | 0.0070% | * | * | * |
1938 | 576 | 104 | 0.0092% | * | * | * |
1937 | 616 | 91 | 0.0083% | * | * | * |
1936 | 631 | 85 | 0.0080% | * | * | * |
1935 | 652 | 84 | 0.0079% | * | * | * |
1934 | 640 | 88 | 0.0083% | * | * | * |
1933 | 636 | 83 | 0.0082% | * | * | * |
1932 | 643 | 88 | 0.0082% | * | * | * |
1931 | 623 | 92 | 0.0086% | * | * | * |
1930 | 616 | 100 | 0.0089% | * | * | * |
1929 | 572 | 109 | 0.0099% | * | * | * |
1928 | 569 | 117 | 0.0103% | * | * | * |
1927 | 627 | 101 | 0.0087% | * | * | * |
1926 | 547 | 124 | 0.0108% | * | * | * |
1925 | 568 | 119 | 0.0103% | * | * | * |
1924 | 564 | 126 | 0.0108% | * | * | * |
1923 | 602 | 111 | 0.0098% | * | * | * |
1922 | 518 | 143 | 0.0127% | * | * | * |
1921 | 512 | 146 | 0.0128% | * | * | * |
1920 | 499 | 146 | 0.0133% | * | * | * |
1919 | 509 | 137 | 0.0135% | * | * | * |
1918 | 545 | 122 | 0.0116% | * | * | * |
1917 | 550 | 115 | 0.0120% | * | * | * |
1916 | 489 | 135 | 0.0146% | * | * | * |
1915 | 583 | 96 | 0.0109% | * | * | * |
1914 | 517 | 90 | 0.0132% | * | * | * |
1913 | 583 | 57 | 0.0106% | * | * | * |
1912 | 504 | 61 | 0.0135% | * | * | * |
1911 | 525 | 32 | 0.0133% | * | * | * |
1910 | 527 | 29 | 0.0139% | * | * | * |
1909 | 498 | 27 | 0.0153% | * | * | * |
1908 | 570 | 20 | 0.0120% | * | * | * |
1907 | 423 | 30 | 0.0189% | * | * | * |
1906 | 348 | 36 | 0.0250% | * | * | * |
1905 | 458 | 24 | 0.0168% | * | * | * |
1904 | 580 | 16 | 0.0116% | * | * | * |
1903 | 407 | 24 | 0.0186% | * | * | * |
1902 | 468 | 21 | 0.0158% | * | * | * |
1901 | 431 | 20 | 0.0173% | * | * | * |
1900 | 365 | 37 | 0.0228% | * | * | * |
1899 | 422 | 20 | 0.0174% | * | * | * |
1898 | 425 | 22 | 0.0166% | * | * | * |
1897 | 344 | 30 | 0.0246% | * | * | * |
1896 | 452 | 20 | 0.0155% | * | * | * |
1895 | 408 | 23 | 0.0182% | * | * | * |
1894 | 335 | 29 | 0.0232% | * | * | * |
1893 | 424 | 19 | 0.0157% | * | * | * |
1892 | 325 | 33 | 0.0251% | * | * | * |
1891 | 295 | 32 | 0.0293% | * | * | * |
1890 | 332 | 28 | 0.0234% | * | * | * |
1889 | 330 | 29 | 0.0244% | * | * | * |
1888 | 321 | 32 | 0.0246% | * | * | * |
1887 | 258 | 39 | 0.0357% | * | * | * |
1886 | 282 | 37 | 0.0311% | * | * | * |
1885 | 305 | 31 | 0.0267% | * | * | * |
1884 | 315 | 31 | 0.0253% | * | * | * |
1883 | 259 | 41 | 0.0364% | * | * | * |
1882 | 264 | 43 | 0.0352% | * | * | * |
1881 | 195 | 58 | 0.0535% | * | * | * |
1880 | 208 | 59 | 0.0498% | * | * | * |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |