Leigh: Statistics About The Baby Name Leigh
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1996 | * | * | * | 899 | 219 | 0.0114% |
1995 | * | * | * | 848 | 230 | 0.0120% |
1994 | * | * | * | 721 | 288 | 0.0148% |
1993 | * | * | * | 617 | 370 | 0.0188% |
1992 | * | * | * | 556 | 424 | 0.0212% |
1991 | * | * | * | 525 | 445 | 0.0219% |
1990 | * | * | * | 468 | 523 | 0.0255% |
1989 | * | * | * | 409 | 605 | 0.0304% |
1988 | * | * | * | 345 | 713 | 0.0372% |
1987 | * | * | * | 357 | 666 | 0.0356% |
1986 | * | * | * | 335 | 719 | 0.0390% |
1985 | * | * | * | 312 | 772 | 0.0419% |
1984 | * | * | * | 271 | 882 | 0.0490% |
1983 | * | * | * | 272 | 863 | 0.0483% |
1982 | * | * | * | 258 | 957 | 0.0528% |
1981 | * | * | * | 230 | 1,097 | 0.0614% |
1980 | * | * | * | 218 | 1,174 | 0.0660% |
1979 | * | * | * | 231 | 1,128 | 0.0655% |
1978 | * | * | * | 258 | 916 | 0.0558% |
1977 | * | * | * | 259 | 952 | 0.0579% |
1976 | * | * | * | 256 | 931 | 0.0593% |
1975 | * | * | * | 228 | 1,064 | 0.0682% |
1974 | * | * | * | 206 | 1,222 | 0.0781% |
1973 | * | * | * | 239 | 1,078 | 0.0694% |
1972 | * | * | * | 229 | 1,210 | 0.0751% |
1971 | 951 | 74 | 0.0041% | 213 | 1,420 | 0.0811% |
1970 | 865 | 87 | 0.0046% | 213 | 1,484 | 0.0811% |
1969 | 876 | 77 | 0.0042% | 202 | 1,564 | 0.0888% |
1968 | 818 | 82 | 0.0046% | 211 | 1,426 | 0.0834% |
1967 | 779 | 88 | 0.0049% | 218 | 1,343 | 0.0783% |
1966 | 877 | 69 | 0.0038% | 266 | 972 | 0.0554% |
1965 | 950 | 60 | 0.0032% | 308 | 865 | 0.0473% |
1964 | 876 | 76 | 0.0038% | 279 | 1,049 | 0.0536% |
1963 | 865 | 76 | 0.0037% | 296 | 982 | 0.0494% |
1962 | 873 | 76 | 0.0036% | 314 | 892 | 0.0440% |
1961 | 849 | 82 | 0.0038% | 326 | 841 | 0.0405% |
1960 | 854 | 79 | 0.0036% | 344 | 770 | 0.0370% |
1959 | 844 | 81 | 0.0037% | 369 | 672 | 0.0323% |
1958 | 791 | 89 | 0.0041% | 367 | 619 | 0.0300% |
1957 | 828 | 84 | 0.0038% | 365 | 616 | 0.0294% |
1956 | 743 | 98 | 0.0046% | 353 | 611 | 0.0297% |
1955 | 653 | 126 | 0.0060% | 406 | 463 | 0.0231% |
1954 | 731 | 97 | 0.0047% | 497 | 320 | 0.0161% |
1953 | 698 | 103 | 0.0052% | 564 | 241 | 0.0125% |
1952 | 697 | 101 | 0.0051% | 651 | 188 | 0.0099% |
1951 | 763 | 84 | 0.0044% | 641 | 184 | 0.0100% |
1950 | 769 | 80 | 0.0044% | 657 | 169 | 0.0096% |
1949 | 674 | 103 | 0.0057% | 651 | 163 | 0.0093% |
1948 | 696 | 93 | 0.0052% | 782 | 121 | 0.0069% |
1947 | 680 | 104 | 0.0056% | 822 | 114 | 0.0063% |
1946 | 707 | 85 | 0.0052% | 722 | 125 | 0.0078% |
1945 | 695 | 77 | 0.0056% | 881 | 74 | 0.0055% |
1944 | 805 | 61 | 0.0044% | * | * | * |
1943 | 743 | 76 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
1942 | 765 | 70 | 0.0050% | * | * | * |
1941 | 822 | 60 | 0.0048% | * | * | * |
1940 | 770 | 65 | 0.0055% | * | * | * |
1939 | 989 | 42 | 0.0037% | * | * | * |
1938 | 851 | 54 | 0.0048% | * | * | * |
1937 | 820 | 56 | 0.0051% | * | * | * |
1936 | 829 | 54 | 0.0051% | * | * | * |
1935 | 950 | 45 | 0.0042% | * | * | * |
1928 | 985 | 49 | 0.0043% | * | * | * |
1897 | 831 | 8 | 0.0066% | * | * | * |
1896 | 940 | 7 | 0.0054% | * | * | * |
1895 | 838 | 8 | 0.0063% | * | * | * |
1894 | 826 | 8 | 0.0064% | * | * | * |
1892 | 773 | 9 | 0.0068% | * | * | * |
1888 | 878 | 7 | 0.0054% | * | * | * |
1887 | 881 | 6 | 0.0055% | * | * | * |
1886 | 731 | 8 | 0.0067% | * | * | * |
1885 | 808 | 7 | 0.0060% | * | * | * |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |