
Laurel: Statistics About The Baby Name Laurel
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls | 
| 2024 | * | * | * | 728 | 386 | 0.0218% | 
| 2023 | * | * | * | 715 | 391 | 0.0224% | 
| 2022 | * | * | * | 706 | 415 | 0.0233% | 
| 2021 | * | * | * | 636 | 464 | 0.0261% | 
| 2020 | * | * | * | 682 | 415 | 0.0235% | 
| 2019 | * | * | * | 732 | 383 | 0.0210% | 
| 2018 | * | * | * | 623 | 480 | 0.0260% | 
| 2017 | * | * | * | 597 | 500 | 0.0267% | 
| 2016 | * | * | * | 643 | 456 | 0.0236% | 
| 2015 | * | * | * | 772 | 365 | 0.0189% | 
| 2014 | * | * | * | 817 | 337 | 0.0174% | 
| 2013 | * | * | * | 873 | 293 | 0.0153% | 
| 2012 | * | * | * | 972 | 260 | 0.0135% | 
| 2011 | * | * | * | 927 | 277 | 0.0144% | 
| 2008 | * | * | * | 985 | 267 | 0.0130% | 
| 2007 | * | * | * | 942 | 283 | 0.0136% | 
| 2006 | * | * | * | 846 | 312 | 0.0152% | 
| 2005 | * | * | * | 787 | 324 | 0.0163% | 
| 2004 | * | * | * | 738 | 353 | 0.0178% | 
| 2003 | * | * | * | 655 | 403 | 0.0202% | 
| 2002 | * | * | * | 672 | 375 | 0.0191% | 
| 2001 | * | * | * | 629 | 397 | 0.0201% | 
| 2000 | * | * | * | 565 | 461 | 0.0232% | 
| 1999 | * | * | * | 566 | 444 | 0.0229% | 
| 1998 | * | * | * | 509 | 497 | 0.0257% | 
| 1997 | * | * | * | 510 | 474 | 0.0249% | 
| 1996 | * | * | * | 610 | 374 | 0.0195% | 
| 1995 | * | * | * | 568 | 406 | 0.0212% | 
| 1994 | * | * | * | 508 | 488 | 0.0251% | 
| 1993 | * | * | * | 562 | 424 | 0.0215% | 
| 1992 | * | * | * | 608 | 374 | 0.0187% | 
| 1991 | * | * | * | 539 | 433 | 0.0213% | 
| 1990 | * | * | * | 531 | 447 | 0.0218% | 
| 1989 | * | * | * | 461 | 526 | 0.0264% | 
| 1988 | * | * | * | 455 | 493 | 0.0257% | 
| 1987 | * | * | * | 482 | 447 | 0.0239% | 
| 1986 | * | * | * | 445 | 484 | 0.0263% | 
| 1985 | * | * | * | 402 | 560 | 0.0304% | 
| 1984 | * | * | * | 427 | 492 | 0.0273% | 
| 1983 | * | * | * | 464 | 434 | 0.0243% | 
| 1982 | * | * | * | 431 | 507 | 0.0280% | 
| 1981 | * | * | * | 449 | 478 | 0.0268% | 
| 1980 | * | * | * | 447 | 478 | 0.0269% | 
| 1979 | * | * | * | 467 | 430 | 0.0250% | 
| 1978 | * | * | * | 559 | 313 | 0.0191% | 
| 1977 | * | * | * | 537 | 337 | 0.0205% | 
| 1976 | * | * | * | 533 | 329 | 0.0209% | 
| 1975 | * | * | * | 548 | 314 | 0.0201% | 
| 1974 | * | * | * | 506 | 343 | 0.0219% | 
| 1973 | * | * | * | 448 | 418 | 0.0269% | 
| 1972 | * | * | * | 418 | 464 | 0.0288% | 
| 1971 | * | * | * | 422 | 496 | 0.0283% | 
| 1970 | * | * | * | 382 | 621 | 0.0339% | 
| 1969 | * | * | * | 369 | 632 | 0.0359% | 
| 1968 | * | * | * | 318 | 752 | 0.0440% | 
| 1967 | * | * | * | 414 | 507 | 0.0295% | 
| 1966 | * | * | * | 444 | 444 | 0.0253% | 
| 1965 | * | * | * | 405 | 524 | 0.0287% | 
| 1964 | * | * | * | 416 | 545 | 0.0279% | 
| 1963 | * | * | * | 355 | 716 | 0.0360% | 
| 1962 | * | * | * | 358 | 699 | 0.0345% | 
| 1961 | * | * | * | 345 | 758 | 0.0365% | 
| 1960 | * | * | * | 334 | 788 | 0.0379% | 
| 1959 | * | * | * | 312 | 876 | 0.0422% | 
| 1958 | * | * | * | 287 | 962 | 0.0466% | 
| 1957 | * | * | * | 255 | 1,122 | 0.0535% | 
| 1956 | * | * | * | 241 | 1,180 | 0.0573% | 
| 1955 | * | * | * | 276 | 983 | 0.0491% | 
| 1954 | * | * | * | 286 | 878 | 0.0441% | 
| 1953 | * | * | * | 268 | 935 | 0.0485% | 
| 1952 | * | * | * | 269 | 886 | 0.0466% | 
| 1951 | * | * | * | 269 | 849 | 0.0461% | 
| 1950 | * | * | * | 281 | 759 | 0.0432% | 
| 1949 | * | * | * | 293 | 693 | 0.0395% | 
| 1948 | * | * | * | 292 | 686 | 0.0394% | 
| 1947 | * | * | * | 277 | 775 | 0.0427% | 
| 1946 | * | * | * | 282 | 675 | 0.0419% | 
| 1945 | * | * | * | 297 | 532 | 0.0395% | 
| 1944 | * | * | * | 378 | 350 | 0.0256% | 
| 1943 | * | * | * | 426 | 298 | 0.0208% | 
| 1942 | * | * | * | 421 | 293 | 0.0211% | 
| 1941 | * | * | * | 398 | 298 | 0.0239% | 
| 1940 | * | * | * | 404 | 287 | 0.0243% | 
| 1939 | * | * | * | 339 | 352 | 0.0310% | 
| 1938 | * | * | * | 397 | 282 | 0.0247% | 
| 1937 | * | * | * | 597 | 127 | 0.0115% | 
| 1936 | * | * | * | 751 | 80 | 0.0074% | 
| 1935 | * | * | * | 652 | 102 | 0.0094% | 
| 1934 | 934 | 46 | 0.0043% | 685 | 96 | 0.0089% | 
| 1933 | * | * | * | 652 | 102 | 0.0098% | 
| 1932 | 930 | 49 | 0.0046% | 600 | 119 | 0.0108% | 
| 1931 | * | * | * | 590 | 126 | 0.0114% | 
| 1930 | * | * | * | 579 | 140 | 0.0120% | 
| 1929 | * | * | * | 567 | 146 | 0.0126% | 
| 1928 | * | * | * | 543 | 164 | 0.0137% | 
| 1927 | 823 | 66 | 0.0057% | 466 | 223 | 0.0180% | 
| 1926 | 788 | 69 | 0.0060% | 538 | 168 | 0.0137% | 
| 1925 | * | * | * | 635 | 134 | 0.0106% | 
| 1924 | * | * | * | 547 | 177 | 0.0137% | 
| 1923 | 925 | 55 | 0.0049% | 486 | 202 | 0.0161% | 
| 1922 | 937 | 56 | 0.0050% | 776 | 88 | 0.0071% | 
| 1921 | 964 | 53 | 0.0047% | 927 | 64 | 0.0050% | 
| 1920 | 943 | 54 | 0.0049% | 888 | 67 | 0.0054% | 
| 1919 | * | * | * | 975 | 54 | 0.0046% | 
| 1918 | * | * | * | 889 | 65 | 0.0054% | 
| 1917 | 989 | 44 | 0.0046% | 938 | 55 | 0.0049% | 
| 1914 | 941 | 35 | 0.0051% | * | * | * | 
| 1912 | 955 | 23 | 0.0051% | * | * | * | 
| 1904 | 849 | 9 | 0.0065% | 924 | 16 | 0.0055% | 
| 1901 | * | * | * | 870 | 15 | 0.0059% | 
| 1898 | * | * | * | 943 | 14 | 0.0051% | 
| 1894 | * | * | * | 768 | 16 | 0.0068% | 
| 1892 | * | * | * | 940 | 11 | 0.0049% | 
| 1891 | * | * | * | 925 | 10 | 0.0051% | 
| 1887 | 1000 | 5 | 0.0046% | * | * | * | 
| 1886 | * | * | * | 947 | 7 | 0.0046% | 
| 1884 | * | * | * | 977 | 6 | 0.0044% | 
| 1883 | * | * | * | 571 | 12 | 0.0100% | 
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
