
Laura: Statistics About The Baby Name Laura
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
| 2024 | * | * | * | 359 | 868 | 0.0491% |
| 2023 | * | * | * | 365 | 837 | 0.0479% |
| 2022 | * | * | * | 363 | 869 | 0.0487% |
| 2021 | * | * | * | 391 | 797 | 0.0448% |
| 2020 | * | * | * | 356 | 866 | 0.0491% |
| 2019 | * | * | * | 337 | 944 | 0.0518% |
| 2018 | * | * | * | 340 | 935 | 0.0506% |
| 2017 | * | * | * | 340 | 939 | 0.0501% |
| 2016 | * | * | * | 345 | 963 | 0.0499% |
| 2015 | * | * | * | 322 | 1,003 | 0.0518% |
| 2014 | * | * | * | 318 | 1,038 | 0.0535% |
| 2013 | * | * | * | 322 | 1,006 | 0.0527% |
| 2012 | * | * | * | 280 | 1,127 | 0.0587% |
| 2011 | * | * | * | 273 | 1,154 | 0.0601% |
| 2010 | * | * | * | 275 | 1,193 | 0.0615% |
| 2009 | * | * | * | 235 | 1,388 | 0.0693% |
| 2008 | * | * | * | 215 | 1,577 | 0.0767% |
| 2007 | * | * | * | 183 | 1,810 | 0.0869% |
| 2006 | * | * | * | 172 | 2,026 | 0.0985% |
| 2005 | * | * | * | 145 | 2,312 | 0.1161% |
| 2004 | * | * | * | 129 | 2,496 | 0.1257% |
| 2003 | * | * | * | 125 | 2,721 | 0.1364% |
| 2002 | * | * | * | 106 | 3,118 | 0.1586% |
| 2001 | * | * | * | 86 | 3,534 | 0.1791% |
| 2000 | * | * | * | 85 | 3,718 | 0.1869% |
| 1999 | * | * | * | 81 | 3,860 | 0.1987% |
| 1998 | * | * | * | 75 | 4,266 | 0.2205% |
| 1997 | * | * | * | 66 | 4,840 | 0.2539% |
| 1996 | * | * | * | 66 | 5,200 | 0.2716% |
| 1995 | * | * | * | 56 | 5,992 | 0.3123% |
| 1994 | * | * | * | 46 | 6,843 | 0.3515% |
| 1993 | * | * | * | 43 | 7,246 | 0.3680% |
| 1992 | * | * | * | 38 | 8,293 | 0.4142% |
| 1991 | * | * | * | 35 | 9,627 | 0.4739% |
| 1990 | * | * | * | 29 | 10,898 | 0.5312% |
| 1989 | * | * | * | 25 | 11,735 | 0.5895% |
| 1988 | * | * | * | 23 | 12,083 | 0.6299% |
| 1987 | * | * | * | 22 | 13,017 | 0.6955% |
| 1986 | * | * | * | 20 | 14,159 | 0.7687% |
| 1985 | * | * | * | 14 | 15,972 | 0.8664% |
| 1984 | * | * | * | 19 | 14,795 | 0.8218% |
| 1983 | * | * | * | 23 | 13,178 | 0.7374% |
| 1982 | * | * | * | 22 | 13,296 | 0.7342% |
| 1981 | * | * | * | 21 | 13,281 | 0.7438% |
| 1980 | * | * | * | 21 | 12,902 | 0.7257% |
| 1979 | * | * | * | 20 | 11,881 | 0.6902% |
| 1978 | * | * | * | 19 | 11,224 | 0.6837% |
| 1977 | * | * | * | 20 | 11,309 | 0.6882% |
| 1976 | * | * | * | 20 | 11,249 | 0.7162% |
| 1975 | * | * | * | 20 | 10,309 | 0.6611% |
| 1974 | * | * | * | 21 | 9,704 | 0.6200% |
| 1973 | * | * | * | 19 | 10,338 | 0.6656% |
| 1972 | * | * | * | 17 | 11,771 | 0.7303% |
| 1971 | * | * | * | 16 | 13,860 | 0.7917% |
| 1970 | * | * | * | 13 | 16,481 | 0.9003% |
| 1969 | * | * | * | 10 | 17,925 | 1.0174% |
| 1968 | 987 | 56 | 0.0032% | 11 | 18,737 | 1.0964% |
| 1967 | * | * | * | 15 | 15,812 | 0.9213% |
| 1966 | * | * | * | 20 | 15,536 | 0.8853% |
| 1965 | * | * | * | 17 | 16,222 | 0.8880% |
| 1964 | * | * | * | 14 | 18,956 | 0.9689% |
| 1963 | 927 | 66 | 0.0032% | 16 | 18,501 | 0.9309% |
| 1962 | * | * | * | 21 | 17,485 | 0.8629% |
| 1961 | * | * | * | 21 | 17,885 | 0.8622% |
| 1960 | * | * | * | 24 | 17,059 | 0.8203% |
| 1959 | * | * | * | 30 | 14,527 | 0.6991% |
| 1958 | * | * | * | 29 | 13,503 | 0.6543% |
| 1957 | * | * | * | 31 | 12,181 | 0.5810% |
| 1956 | * | * | * | 34 | 10,559 | 0.5129% |
| 1955 | * | * | * | 41 | 9,003 | 0.4494% |
| 1954 | * | * | * | 45 | 8,716 | 0.4379% |
| 1953 | * | * | * | 51 | 7,625 | 0.3956% |
| 1952 | * | * | * | 53 | 7,191 | 0.3781% |
| 1951 | * | * | * | 60 | 6,457 | 0.3503% |
| 1950 | * | * | * | 63 | 5,723 | 0.3255% |
| 1949 | * | * | * | 65 | 5,378 | 0.3066% |
| 1948 | * | * | * | 73 | 4,885 | 0.2806% |
| 1947 | * | * | * | 74 | 5,048 | 0.2780% |
| 1946 | * | * | * | 74 | 4,479 | 0.2782% |
| 1945 | * | * | * | 77 | 3,580 | 0.2660% |
| 1944 | * | * | * | 119 | 2,246 | 0.1645% |
| 1943 | * | * | * | 116 | 2,391 | 0.1670% |
| 1942 | * | * | * | 115 | 2,410 | 0.1732% |
| 1941 | * | * | * | 115 | 2,275 | 0.1828% |
| 1940 | * | * | * | 107 | 2,355 | 0.1994% |
| 1939 | * | * | * | 107 | 2,372 | 0.2092% |
| 1938 | * | * | * | 108 | 2,439 | 0.2137% |
| 1937 | * | * | * | 105 | 2,357 | 0.2140% |
| 1936 | * | * | * | 107 | 2,254 | 0.2093% |
| 1935 | * | * | * | 100 | 2,361 | 0.2174% |
| 1934 | * | * | * | 96 | 2,439 | 0.2255% |
| 1933 | * | * | * | 91 | 2,534 | 0.2424% |
| 1932 | * | * | * | 89 | 2,747 | 0.2484% |
| 1931 | * | * | * | 89 | 2,663 | 0.2416% |
| 1930 | * | * | * | 89 | 2,909 | 0.2496% |
| 1929 | * | * | * | 90 | 2,937 | 0.2539% |
| 1928 | * | * | * | 82 | 3,146 | 0.2634% |
| 1927 | * | * | * | 82 | 3,327 | 0.2692% |
| 1926 | * | * | * | 81 | 3,367 | 0.2740% |
| 1925 | * | * | * | 75 | 3,595 | 0.2848% |
| 1924 | * | * | * | 72 | 3,833 | 0.2958% |
| 1923 | * | * | * | 74 | 3,705 | 0.2959% |
| 1922 | * | * | * | 68 | 3,912 | 0.3137% |
| 1921 | * | * | * | 71 | 3,985 | 0.3117% |
| 1920 | * | * | * | 63 | 4,171 | 0.3354% |
| 1919 | * | * | * | 71 | 3,658 | 0.3114% |
| 1918 | * | * | * | 64 | 4,066 | 0.3382% |
| 1917 | * | * | * | 65 | 3,809 | 0.3392% |
| 1916 | * | * | * | 64 | 3,742 | 0.3449% |
| 1915 | * | * | * | 61 | 3,719 | 0.3635% |
| 1914 | * | * | * | 59 | 3,053 | 0.3841% |
| 1913 | * | * | * | 62 | 2,451 | 0.3753% |
| 1912 | * | * | * | 57 | 2,402 | 0.4105% |
| 1911 | * | * | * | 57 | 1,783 | 0.4048% |
| 1910 | * | * | * | 53 | 1,830 | 0.4372% |
| 1909 | * | * | * | 55 | 1,523 | 0.4145% |
| 1908 | * | * | * | 52 | 1,555 | 0.4392% |
| 1907 | * | * | * | 51 | 1,618 | 0.4799% |
| 1906 | * | * | * | 52 | 1,466 | 0.4680% |
| 1905 | 969 | 8 | 0.0056% | 49 | 1,566 | 0.5055% |
| 1904 | * | * | * | 47 | 1,508 | 0.5157% |
| 1903 | * | * | * | 43 | 1,503 | 0.5404% |
| 1902 | * | * | * | 43 | 1,560 | 0.5565% |
| 1901 | * | * | * | 44 | 1,402 | 0.5515% |
| 1900 | * | * | * | 45 | 1,825 | 0.5738% |
| 1899 | * | * | * | 43 | 1,472 | 0.5948% |
| 1898 | 592 | 14 | 0.0106% | 38 | 1,769 | 0.6452% |
| 1897 | 896 | 7 | 0.0057% | 39 | 1,585 | 0.6384% |
| 1896 | * | * | * | 37 | 1,665 | 0.6607% |
| 1895 | * | * | * | 36 | 1,642 | 0.6645% |
| 1894 | * | * | * | 32 | 1,730 | 0.7331% |
| 1893 | 877 | 7 | 0.0058% | 31 | 1,683 | 0.7472% |
| 1892 | * | * | * | 29 | 1,744 | 0.7754% |
| 1891 | 911 | 6 | 0.0055% | 30 | 1,509 | 0.7676% |
| 1890 | 707 | 9 | 0.0075% | 27 | 1,634 | 0.8102% |
| 1889 | * | * | * | 25 | 1,567 | 0.8281% |
| 1888 | 628 | 11 | 0.0085% | 25 | 1,625 | 0.8577% |
| 1887 | 879 | 6 | 0.0055% | 22 | 1,364 | 0.8775% |
| 1886 | * | * | * | 22 | 1,372 | 0.8924% |
| 1885 | * | * | * | 21 | 1,325 | 0.9333% |
| 1884 | * | * | * | 21 | 1,246 | 0.9055% |
| 1883 | * | * | * | 19 | 1,183 | 0.9852% |
| 1882 | * | * | * | 17 | 1,151 | 0.9948% |
| 1881 | * | * | * | 19 | 962 | 0.9730% |
| 1880 | * | * | * | 17 | 1,012 | 1.0367% |
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
