Kimberly: Statistics About The Baby Name Kimberly
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
| 2022 | - | - | - | 210 | 1,384 | 0.0776% |
| 2021 | - | - | - | 220 | 1,340 | 0.0753% |
| 2020 | - | - | - | 184 | 1,556 | 0.0883% |
| 2019 | - | - | - | 194 | 1,527 | 0.0838% |
| 2018 | - | - | - | 170 | 1,696 | 0.0919% |
| 2017 | - | - | - | 164 | 1,823 | 0.0972% |
| 2016 | - | - | - | 133 | 2,326 | 0.1206% |
| 2015 | - | - | - | 107 | 2,826 | 0.1460% |
| 2014 | - | - | - | 105 | 2,883 | 0.1487% |
| 2013 | - | - | - | 101 | 3,084 | 0.1615% |
| 2012 | - | - | - | 88 | 3,297 | 0.1716% |
| 2011 | - | - | - | 67 | 3,782 | 0.1969% |
| 2010 | - | - | - | 68 | 3,849 | 0.1983% |
| 2009 | - | - | - | 66 | 4,189 | 0.2092% |
| 2008 | - | - | - | 57 | 4,764 | 0.2318% |
| 2007 | - | - | - | 53 | 5,032 | 0.2415% |
| 2006 | - | - | - | 58 | 4,936 | 0.2400% |
| 2005 | - | - | - | 63 | 4,679 | 0.2349% |
| 2004 | - | - | - | 61 | 4,782 | 0.2407% |
| 2003 | - | - | - | 64 | 4,799 | 0.2407% |
| 2002 | - | - | - | 63 | 4,766 | 0.2424% |
| 2001 | - | - | - | 61 | 4,866 | 0.2465% |
| 2000 | - | - | - | 58 | 5,232 | 0.2629% |
| 1999 | - | - | - | 51 | 5,440 | 0.2801% |
| 1998 | - | - | - | 54 | 5,710 | 0.2952% |
| 1997 | - | - | - | 49 | 6,173 | 0.3239% |
| 1996 | - | - | - | 41 | 7,172 | 0.3746% |
| 1995 | - | - | - | 37 | 7,737 | 0.4032% |
| 1994 | - | - | - | 32 | 8,745 | 0.4492% |
| 1993 | - | - | - | 39 | 7,960 | 0.4043% |
| 1992 | - | - | - | 35 | 8,894 | 0.4442% |
| 1991 | - | - | - | 34 | 9,799 | 0.4824% |
| 1990 | - | - | - | 31 | 10,186 | 0.4965% |
| 1989 | - | - | - | 28 | 11,044 | 0.5548% |
| 1988 | - | - | - | 25 | 11,937 | 0.6222% |
| 1987 | - | - | - | 21 | 13,028 | 0.6961% |
| 1986 | - | - | - | 18 | 14,405 | 0.7820% |
| 1985 | - | - | - | 19 | 14,908 | 0.8087% |
| 1984 | - | - | - | 22 | 14,435 | 0.8018% |
| 1983 | - | - | - | 15 | 15,364 | 0.8597% |
| 1982 | - | - | - | 14 | 16,087 | 0.8883% |
| 1981 | - | - | - | 13 | 16,681 | 0.9342% |
| 1980 | 998 | 82 | 0.0044% | 11 | 18,487 | 1.0398% |
| 1979 | - | - | - | 12 | 17,635 | 1.0245% |
| 1978 | - | - | - | 13 | 16,862 | 1.0271% |
| 1977 | 957 | 80 | 0.0047% | 8 | 18,284 | 1.1127% |
| 1976 | - | - | - | 7 | 18,964 | 1.2074% |
| 1975 | 908 | 82 | 0.0051% | 7 | 20,260 | 1.2992% |
| 1974 | 828 | 95 | 0.0058% | 6 | 22,411 | 1.4319% |
| 1973 | 812 | 95 | 0.0059% | 4 | 23,520 | 1.5144% |
| 1972 | 842 | 91 | 0.0054% | 4 | 26,285 | 1.6308% |
| 1971 | 800 | 101 | 0.0056% | 4 | 30,670 | 1.7518% |
| 1970 | 771 | 115 | 0.0060% | 3 | 34,108 | 1.8633% |
| 1969 | 723 | 116 | 0.0063% | 4 | 33,056 | 1.8762% |
| 1968 | 715 | 111 | 0.0063% | 3 | 31,900 | 1.8666% |
| 1967 | 685 | 118 | 0.0066% | 2 | 33,090 | 1.9281% |
| 1966 | 694 | 114 | 0.0063% | 2 | 32,208 | 1.8353% |
| 1965 | 677 | 120 | 0.0063% | 4 | 28,828 | 1.5780% |
| 1964 | 768 | 99 | 0.0049% | 6 | 24,123 | 1.2330% |
| 1963 | 806 | 88 | 0.0043% | 11 | 21,232 | 1.0683% |
| 1962 | 848 | 79 | 0.0038% | 16 | 20,355 | 1.0045% |
| 1961 | 726 | 112 | 0.0052% | 22 | 17,334 | 0.8356% |
| 1960 | 782 | 96 | 0.0044% | 26 | 16,862 | 0.8109% |
| 1959 | 730 | 110 | 0.0051% | 33 | 12,781 | 0.6151% |
| 1958 | 652 | 139 | 0.0065% | 39 | 10,706 | 0.5187% |
| 1957 | 614 | 156 | 0.0071% | 42 | 9,446 | 0.4505% |
| 1956 | 602 | 159 | 0.0074% | 73 | 6,732 | 0.3270% |
| 1955 | 551 | 179 | 0.0086% | 110 | 3,863 | 0.1928% |
| 1954 | 610 | 146 | 0.0071% | 166 | 2,098 | 0.1054% |
| 1953 | 641 | 123 | 0.0062% | 210 | 1,425 | 0.0739% |
| 1952 | 731 | 93 | 0.0047% | 253 | 967 | 0.0508% |
| 1951 | 709 | 95 | 0.0050% | 365 | 488 | 0.0265% |
| 1950 | - | - | - | 383 | 444 | 0.0253% |
| 1949 | - | - | - | 413 | 364 | 0.0208% |
| 1948 | - | - | - | 451 | 314 | 0.0180% |
| 1947 | - | - | - | 526 | 253 | 0.0139% |
| 1946 | - | - | - | 700 | 133 | 0.0083% |
