Kimberly: Statistics About The Baby Name Kimberly
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
2023 | * | * | * | 222 | 1,329 | 0.0760% |
2022 | * | * | * | 210 | 1,384 | 0.0776% |
2021 | * | * | * | 220 | 1,340 | 0.0753% |
2020 | * | * | * | 184 | 1,556 | 0.0883% |
2019 | * | * | * | 194 | 1,527 | 0.0838% |
2018 | * | * | * | 170 | 1,696 | 0.0919% |
2017 | * | * | * | 164 | 1,823 | 0.0972% |
2016 | * | * | * | 133 | 2,326 | 0.1206% |
2015 | * | * | * | 107 | 2,826 | 0.1460% |
2014 | * | * | * | 105 | 2,883 | 0.1487% |
2013 | * | * | * | 101 | 3,084 | 0.1615% |
2012 | * | * | * | 88 | 3,297 | 0.1716% |
2011 | * | * | * | 67 | 3,782 | 0.1969% |
2010 | * | * | * | 68 | 3,849 | 0.1983% |
2009 | * | * | * | 66 | 4,189 | 0.2092% |
2008 | * | * | * | 57 | 4,764 | 0.2318% |
2007 | * | * | * | 53 | 5,032 | 0.2415% |
2006 | * | * | * | 58 | 4,936 | 0.2400% |
2005 | * | * | * | 63 | 4,679 | 0.2349% |
2004 | * | * | * | 61 | 4,782 | 0.2407% |
2003 | * | * | * | 64 | 4,799 | 0.2407% |
2002 | * | * | * | 63 | 4,766 | 0.2424% |
2001 | * | * | * | 61 | 4,866 | 0.2465% |
2000 | * | * | * | 58 | 5,232 | 0.2629% |
1999 | * | * | * | 51 | 5,440 | 0.2801% |
1998 | * | * | * | 54 | 5,710 | 0.2952% |
1997 | * | * | * | 49 | 6,173 | 0.3239% |
1996 | * | * | * | 41 | 7,172 | 0.3746% |
1995 | * | * | * | 37 | 7,737 | 0.4032% |
1994 | * | * | * | 32 | 8,745 | 0.4492% |
1993 | * | * | * | 39 | 7,960 | 0.4043% |
1992 | * | * | * | 35 | 8,894 | 0.4442% |
1991 | * | * | * | 34 | 9,799 | 0.4824% |
1990 | * | * | * | 31 | 10,186 | 0.4965% |
1989 | * | * | * | 28 | 11,044 | 0.5548% |
1988 | * | * | * | 25 | 11,937 | 0.6222% |
1987 | * | * | * | 21 | 13,028 | 0.6961% |
1986 | * | * | * | 18 | 14,405 | 0.7820% |
1985 | * | * | * | 19 | 14,908 | 0.8087% |
1984 | * | * | * | 22 | 14,435 | 0.8018% |
1983 | * | * | * | 15 | 15,364 | 0.8597% |
1982 | * | * | * | 14 | 16,087 | 0.8883% |
1981 | * | * | * | 13 | 16,681 | 0.9342% |
1980 | 998 | 82 | 0.0044% | 11 | 18,487 | 1.0398% |
1979 | * | * | * | 12 | 17,635 | 1.0245% |
1978 | * | * | * | 13 | 16,862 | 1.0271% |
1977 | 957 | 80 | 0.0047% | 8 | 18,284 | 1.1127% |
1976 | * | * | * | 7 | 18,964 | 1.2074% |
1975 | 908 | 82 | 0.0051% | 7 | 20,260 | 1.2992% |
1974 | 828 | 95 | 0.0058% | 6 | 22,411 | 1.4319% |
1973 | 812 | 95 | 0.0059% | 4 | 23,520 | 1.5144% |
1972 | 842 | 91 | 0.0054% | 4 | 26,285 | 1.6308% |
1971 | 800 | 101 | 0.0056% | 4 | 30,670 | 1.7518% |
1970 | 771 | 115 | 0.0060% | 3 | 34,108 | 1.8633% |
1969 | 723 | 116 | 0.0063% | 4 | 33,056 | 1.8762% |
1968 | 715 | 111 | 0.0063% | 3 | 31,900 | 1.8666% |
1967 | 685 | 118 | 0.0066% | 2 | 33,090 | 1.9281% |
1966 | 694 | 114 | 0.0063% | 2 | 32,208 | 1.8353% |
1965 | 677 | 120 | 0.0063% | 4 | 28,828 | 1.5780% |
1964 | 768 | 99 | 0.0049% | 6 | 24,123 | 1.2330% |
1963 | 806 | 88 | 0.0043% | 11 | 21,232 | 1.0683% |
1962 | 848 | 79 | 0.0038% | 16 | 20,355 | 1.0045% |
1961 | 726 | 112 | 0.0052% | 22 | 17,334 | 0.8356% |
1960 | 782 | 96 | 0.0044% | 26 | 16,862 | 0.8109% |
1959 | 730 | 110 | 0.0051% | 33 | 12,781 | 0.6151% |
1958 | 652 | 139 | 0.0065% | 39 | 10,706 | 0.5187% |
1957 | 614 | 156 | 0.0071% | 42 | 9,446 | 0.4505% |
1956 | 602 | 159 | 0.0074% | 73 | 6,732 | 0.3270% |
1955 | 551 | 179 | 0.0086% | 110 | 3,863 | 0.1928% |
1954 | 610 | 146 | 0.0071% | 166 | 2,098 | 0.1054% |
1953 | 641 | 123 | 0.0062% | 210 | 1,425 | 0.0739% |
1952 | 731 | 93 | 0.0047% | 253 | 967 | 0.0508% |
1951 | 709 | 95 | 0.0050% | 365 | 488 | 0.0265% |
1950 | * | * | * | 383 | 444 | 0.0253% |
1949 | * | * | * | 413 | 364 | 0.0208% |
1948 | * | * | * | 451 | 314 | 0.0180% |
1947 | * | * | * | 526 | 253 | 0.0139% |
1946 | * | * | * | 700 | 133 | 0.0083% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |