Kim: Statistics About The Baby Name Kim
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
1991 | * | * | * | 931 | 206 | 0.0101% |
1990 | * | * | * | 787 | 256 | 0.0125% |
1989 | * | * | * | 758 | 259 | 0.0130% |
1988 | * | * | * | 748 | 250 | 0.0130% |
1987 | * | * | * | 666 | 279 | 0.0149% |
1986 | * | * | * | 663 | 279 | 0.0151% |
1985 | 953 | 92 | 0.0048% | 566 | 347 | 0.0188% |
1984 | 916 | 92 | 0.0049% | 509 | 385 | 0.0214% |
1983 | 922 | 91 | 0.0049% | 490 | 401 | 0.0224% |
1982 | 912 | 96 | 0.0051% | 456 | 466 | 0.0257% |
1981 | 842 | 109 | 0.0059% | 411 | 533 | 0.0298% |
1980 | 833 | 112 | 0.0061% | 382 | 600 | 0.0337% |
1979 | 821 | 113 | 0.0063% | 307 | 780 | 0.0453% |
1978 | 761 | 123 | 0.0072% | 283 | 818 | 0.0498% |
1977 | 745 | 131 | 0.0077% | 230 | 1,085 | 0.0660% |
1976 | 706 | 139 | 0.0085% | 195 | 1,249 | 0.0795% |
1975 | 632 | 164 | 0.0101% | 178 | 1,486 | 0.0953% |
1974 | 634 | 161 | 0.0099% | 144 | 1,939 | 0.1239% |
1973 | 586 | 184 | 0.0114% | 129 | 2,194 | 0.1413% |
1972 | 537 | 220 | 0.0132% | 118 | 2,735 | 0.1697% |
1971 | 492 | 267 | 0.0147% | 102 | 3,681 | 0.2103% |
1970 | 457 | 314 | 0.0165% | 78 | 4,725 | 0.2581% |
1969 | 416 | 362 | 0.0198% | 66 | 5,452 | 0.3095% |
1968 | 385 | 408 | 0.0230% | 57 | 6,088 | 0.3562% |
1967 | 348 | 458 | 0.0258% | 49 | 7,406 | 0.4315% |
1966 | 317 | 550 | 0.0303% | 43 | 9,190 | 0.5237% |
1965 | 305 | 612 | 0.0323% | 43 | 10,077 | 0.5516% |
1964 | 278 | 779 | 0.0385% | 42 | 9,981 | 0.5102% |
1963 | 264 | 847 | 0.0410% | 39 | 10,675 | 0.5371% |
1962 | 256 | 913 | 0.0435% | 37 | 11,643 | 0.5746% |
1961 | 239 | 1,103 | 0.0512% | 36 | 11,368 | 0.5480% |
1960 | 237 | 1,154 | 0.0533% | 34 | 12,471 | 0.5997% |
1959 | 241 | 1,109 | 0.0512% | 35 | 11,589 | 0.5577% |
1958 | 206 | 1,313 | 0.0611% | 40 | 10,647 | 0.5159% |
1957 | 162 | 1,976 | 0.0904% | 35 | 11,419 | 0.5446% |
1956 | 119 | 2,950 | 0.1377% | 38 | 9,892 | 0.4805% |
1955 | 97 | 3,498 | 0.1677% | 74 | 5,688 | 0.2839% |
1954 | 110 | 3,163 | 0.1531% | 133 | 2,936 | 0.1475% |
1953 | 127 | 2,554 | 0.1279% | 182 | 1,744 | 0.0905% |
1952 | 127 | 2,343 | 0.1188% | 216 | 1,291 | 0.0679% |
1951 | 172 | 1,477 | 0.0776% | 331 | 570 | 0.0309% |
1950 | 231 | 798 | 0.0439% | 480 | 286 | 0.0163% |
1949 | 255 | 634 | 0.0353% | 515 | 252 | 0.0144% |
1948 | 305 | 510 | 0.0287% | 536 | 238 | 0.0137% |
1947 | 298 | 531 | 0.0287% | 521 | 254 | 0.0140% |
1946 | 318 | 405 | 0.0246% | 581 | 190 | 0.0118% |
1945 | 433 | 188 | 0.0137% | 848 | 79 | 0.0059% |
1944 | 523 | 135 | 0.0098% | 836 | 83 | 0.0061% |
1943 | 620 | 104 | 0.0072% | * | * | * |
1942 | 684 | 88 | 0.0062% | * | * | * |
1941 | 852 | 55 | 0.0044% | * | * | * |
1940 | 768 | 65 | 0.0055% | * | * | * |
1939 | 852 | 52 | 0.0046% | * | * | * |
1937 | 811 | 58 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
1936 | 855 | 51 | 0.0048% | * | * | * |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |