Joseph: Statistics About The Baby Name Joseph
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
2023 | 29 | 7,237 | 0.3952% | * | * | * |
2022 | 30 | 7,771 | 0.4170% | * | * | * |
2021 | 28 | 8,067 | 0.4336% | * | * | * |
2020 | 26 | 8,430 | 0.4572% | * | * | * |
2019 | 24 | 9,058 | 0.4746% | * | * | * |
2018 | 23 | 9,555 | 0.4954% | * | * | * |
2017 | 19 | 10,360 | 0.5277% | * | * | * |
2016 | 20 | 10,892 | 0.5398% | * | * | * |
2015 | 21 | 11,375 | 0.5612% | * | * | * |
2014 | 20 | 11,995 | 0.5909% | * | * | * |
2013 | 20 | 12,095 | 0.6046% | * | * | * |
2012 | 20 | 12,404 | 0.6172% | * | * | * |
2011 | 22 | 12,798 | 0.6359% | * | * | * |
2010 | 20 | 13,657 | 0.6715% | * | * | * |
2009 | 16 | 14,674 | 0.7001% | * | * | * |
2008 | 13 | 16,281 | 0.7570% | * | * | * |
2007 | 13 | 17,018 | 0.7805% | * | * | * |
2006 | 11 | 18,037 | 0.8367% | * | * | * |
2005 | 10 | 18,737 | 0.8977% | * | * | * |
2004 | 9 | 19,695 | 0.9470% | * | * | * |
2003 | 7 | 21,188 | 1.0148% | * | * | * |
2002 | 7 | 21,771 | 1.0581% | * | * | * |
2001 | 8 | 21,888 | 1.0620% | * | * | * |
2000 | 8 | 22,734 | 1.0919% | * | * | * |
1999 | 8 | 23,153 | 1.1382% | * | * | * |
1998 | 11 | 23,126 | 1.1428% | * | * | * |
1997 | 12 | 23,542 | 1.1804% | * | * | * |
1996 | 12 | 24,696 | 1.2344% | * | * | * |
1995 | 12 | 25,292 | 1.2592% | * | * | * |
1994 | 11 | 25,684 | 1.2620% | * | * | * |
1993 | 12 | 26,959 | 1.3072% | * | * | * |
1992 | 11 | 27,849 | 1.3288% | * | * | * |
1991 | 9 | 29,799 | 1.4076% | * | * | * |
1990 | 10 | 30,076 | 1.3998% | * | * | * |
1989 | 11 | 29,850 | 1.4259% | * | * | * |
1988 | 12 | 28,938 | 1.4491% | 931 | 181 | 0.0094% |
1987 | 12 | 28,482 | 1.4630% | 809 | 217 | 0.0116% |
1986 | 12 | 28,777 | 1.5008% | 800 | 209 | 0.0113% |
1985 | 10 | 30,162 | 1.5704% | 756 | 226 | 0.0123% |
1984 | 10 | 30,475 | 1.6274% | 763 | 212 | 0.0118% |
1983 | 11 | 30,405 | 1.6349% | 762 | 211 | 0.0118% |
1982 | 11 | 30,997 | 1.6463% | 814 | 194 | 0.0107% |
1981 | 11 | 30,724 | 1.6534% | 845 | 185 | 0.0104% |
1980 | 10 | 30,124 | 1.6281% | 761 | 218 | 0.0123% |
1979 | 11 | 28,621 | 1.6007% | 768 | 209 | 0.0121% |
1978 | 10 | 26,642 | 1.5628% | 828 | 180 | 0.0110% |
1977 | 10 | 26,443 | 1.5500% | 845 | 176 | 0.0107% |
1976 | 12 | 24,022 | 1.4736% | 923 | 141 | 0.0090% |
1975 | 12 | 22,090 | 1.3638% | 946 | 134 | 0.0086% |
1974 | 12 | 21,826 | 1.3408% | 991 | 123 | 0.0079% |
1973 | 12 | 21,265 | 1.3197% | 919 | 134 | 0.0086% |
1972 | 12 | 22,437 | 1.3418% | 964 | 126 | 0.0078% |
1971 | 15 | 24,469 | 1.3486% | 895 | 148 | 0.0085% |
1970 | 16 | 26,699 | 1.4037% | 929 | 138 | 0.0075% |
1969 | 15 | 26,194 | 1.4326% | 829 | 155 | 0.0088% |
1968 | 16 | 25,371 | 1.4298% | 891 | 134 | 0.0078% |
1967 | 15 | 25,915 | 1.4574% | 927 | 122 | 0.0071% |
1966 | 15 | 26,960 | 1.4845% | * | * | * |
1965 | 11 | 28,647 | 1.5124% | 941 | 118 | 0.0065% |
1964 | 11 | 30,539 | 1.5078% | 965 | 120 | 0.0061% |
1963 | 13 | 30,088 | 1.4577% | 893 | 138 | 0.0069% |
1962 | 13 | 30,071 | 1.4317% | * | * | * |
1961 | 12 | 29,388 | 1.3654% | * | * | * |
1960 | 12 | 29,732 | 1.3734% | 969 | 122 | 0.0059% |
1959 | 13 | 29,521 | 1.3637% | * | * | * |
1958 | 12 | 30,046 | 1.3974% | * | * | * |
1957 | 12 | 31,795 | 1.4550% | * | * | * |
1956 | 12 | 32,679 | 1.5256% | * | * | * |
1955 | 13 | 31,540 | 1.5118% | * | * | * |
1954 | 13 | 31,194 | 1.5097% | * | * | * |
1953 | 13 | 29,136 | 1.4591% | * | * | * |
1952 | 12 | 28,524 | 1.4457% | * | * | * |
1951 | 14 | 28,059 | 1.4741% | * | * | * |
1950 | 13 | 27,013 | 1.4857% | * | * | * |
1949 | 14 | 26,300 | 1.4640% | * | * | * |
1948 | 13 | 26,737 | 1.5040% | * | * | * |
1947 | 14 | 27,413 | 1.4805% | * | * | * |
1946 | 14 | 24,202 | 1.4723% | * | * | * |
1945 | 14 | 20,783 | 1.5174% | 995 | 60 | 0.0045% |
1944 | 13 | 21,106 | 1.5246% | 850 | 80 | 0.0059% |
1943 | 13 | 22,694 | 1.5678% | 980 | 66 | 0.0046% |
1942 | 11 | 22,457 | 1.5941% | 882 | 78 | 0.0056% |
1941 | 12 | 19,751 | 1.5768% | 912 | 65 | 0.0052% |
1940 | 12 | 18,209 | 1.5354% | 894 | 64 | 0.0054% |
1939 | 12 | 17,723 | 1.5633% | 898 | 61 | 0.0054% |
1938 | 12 | 17,728 | 1.5611% | 811 | 76 | 0.0067% |
1937 | 12 | 17,297 | 1.5836% | 888 | 61 | 0.0055% |
1936 | 11 | 17,440 | 1.6405% | 812 | 69 | 0.0064% |
1935 | 10 | 17,170 | 1.6075% | 771 | 77 | 0.0071% |
1934 | 10 | 17,083 | 1.6108% | 720 | 86 | 0.0080% |
1933 | 9 | 17,119 | 1.6815% | 657 | 100 | 0.0096% |
1932 | 9 | 18,524 | 1.7268% | 660 | 104 | 0.0094% |
1931 | 9 | 19,282 | 1.8071% | 629 | 111 | 0.0101% |
1930 | 9 | 20,963 | 1.8597% | 568 | 144 | 0.0124% |
1929 | 9 | 21,082 | 1.9068% | 541 | 159 | 0.0137% |
1928 | 9 | 22,278 | 1.9553% | 516 | 181 | 0.0152% |
1927 | 9 | 23,445 | 2.0213% | 556 | 162 | 0.0131% |
1926 | 8 | 23,744 | 2.0752% | 552 | 163 | 0.0133% |
1925 | 7 | 24,577 | 2.1371% | 637 | 132 | 0.0105% |
1924 | 7 | 25,414 | 2.1751% | 640 | 138 | 0.0107% |
1923 | 7 | 25,565 | 2.2576% | 711 | 105 | 0.0084% |
1922 | 7 | 25,713 | 2.2842% | 716 | 104 | 0.0083% |
1921 | 7 | 26,189 | 2.3029% | 678 | 120 | 0.0094% |
1920 | 7 | 25,584 | 2.3243% | 689 | 112 | 0.0090% |
1919 | 7 | 24,270 | 2.3891% | 743 | 90 | 0.0077% |
1918 | 7 | 26,285 | 2.5029% | 752 | 90 | 0.0075% |
1917 | 5 | 24,759 | 2.5809% | 710 | 95 | 0.0085% |
1916 | 5 | 23,889 | 2.5869% | 783 | 77 | 0.0071% |
1915 | 5 | 23,066 | 2.6171% | 793 | 69 | 0.0067% |
1914 | 5 | 18,831 | 2.7572% | 696 | 69 | 0.0087% |
1913 | 5 | 14,463 | 2.6999% | 874 | 37 | 0.0057% |
1912 | 5 | 12,050 | 2.6719% | 752 | 45 | 0.0077% |
1911 | 6 | 6,469 | 2.6858% | 817 | 28 | 0.0064% |
1910 | 6 | 5,226 | 2.5104% | 801 | 29 | 0.0069% |
1909 | 6 | 4,342 | 2.4586% | 736 | 30 | 0.0082% |
1908 | 6 | 4,158 | 2.5008% | 865 | 21 | 0.0059% |
1907 | 7 | 3,845 | 2.4257% | * | * | * |
1906 | 7 | 3,523 | 2.4457% | 810 | 21 | 0.0067% |
1905 | 7 | 3,303 | 2.3056% | 790 | 22 | 0.0071% |
1904 | 7 | 3,292 | 2.3767% | 864 | 18 | 0.0062% |
1903 | 6 | 3,121 | 2.4127% | * | * | * |
1902 | 7 | 3,099 | 2.3339% | * | * | * |
1901 | 6 | 2,770 | 2.3955% | 900 | 14 | 0.0055% |
1900 | 7 | 3,717 | 2.2867% | * | * | * |
1899 | 6 | 2,678 | 2.3242% | 740 | 19 | 0.0077% |
1898 | 6 | 3,173 | 2.4010% | 686 | 23 | 0.0084% |
1897 | 6 | 2,827 | 2.3176% | 706 | 20 | 0.0081% |
1896 | 6 | 3,052 | 2.3639% | 645 | 24 | 0.0095% |
1895 | 7 | 2,992 | 2.3619% | 651 | 23 | 0.0093% |
1894 | 6 | 2,978 | 2.3839% | 730 | 17 | 0.0072% |
1893 | 6 | 2,997 | 2.4753% | 557 | 26 | 0.0115% |
1892 | 7 | 3,064 | 2.3304% | 847 | 13 | 0.0058% |
1891 | 7 | 2,572 | 2.3536% | 868 | 11 | 0.0056% |
1890 | 7 | 2,670 | 2.2302% | 853 | 11 | 0.0055% |
1889 | 7 | 2,729 | 2.2921% | * | * | * |
1888 | 7 | 2,993 | 2.3037% | 603 | 18 | 0.0095% |
1887 | 7 | 2,456 | 2.2465% | 649 | 13 | 0.0084% |
1886 | 7 | 2,594 | 2.1788% | 863 | 8 | 0.0052% |
1885 | 7 | 2,540 | 2.1906% | 593 | 14 | 0.0099% |
1884 | 7 | 2,708 | 2.2061% | 766 | 9 | 0.0065% |
1883 | 7 | 2,516 | 2.2365% | 471 | 17 | 0.0142% |
1882 | 7 | 2,671 | 2.1884% | 854 | 6 | 0.0052% |
1881 | 7 | 2,457 | 2.2685% | 560 | 10 | 0.0101% |
1880 | 7 | 2,633 | 2.2234% | 562 | 10 | 0.0102% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |