John: Statistics About The Baby Name John
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
2023 | 26 | 7,750 | 0.4232% | * | * | * |
2022 | 26 | 7,930 | 0.4255% | * | * | * |
2021 | 27 | 8,130 | 0.4369% | * | * | * |
2020 | 27 | 8,236 | 0.4466% | * | * | * |
2019 | 28 | 8,779 | 0.4599% | * | * | * |
2018 | 27 | 9,119 | 0.4728% | * | * | * |
2017 | 27 | 9,434 | 0.4805% | * | * | * |
2016 | 28 | 9,995 | 0.4953% | * | * | * |
2015 | 26 | 10,303 | 0.5083% | * | * | * |
2014 | 26 | 10,600 | 0.5222% | * | * | * |
2013 | 27 | 10,588 | 0.5293% | * | * | * |
2012 | 28 | 10,505 | 0.5227% | * | * | * |
2011 | 27 | 10,934 | 0.5433% | * | * | * |
2010 | 26 | 11,424 | 0.5617% | * | * | * |
2009 | 26 | 11,958 | 0.5705% | * | * | * |
2008 | 20 | 13,124 | 0.6102% | * | * | * |
2007 | 19 | 14,185 | 0.6506% | * | * | * |
2006 | 20 | 14,924 | 0.6923% | * | * | * |
2005 | 18 | 15,458 | 0.7406% | * | * | * |
2004 | 18 | 16,133 | 0.7758% | * | * | * |
2003 | 17 | 17,102 | 0.8191% | * | * | * |
2002 | 17 | 17,381 | 0.8447% | * | * | * |
2001 | 14 | 18,819 | 0.9131% | * | * | * |
2000 | 14 | 20,025 | 0.9618% | * | * | * |
1999 | 15 | 20,282 | 0.9971% | * | * | * |
1998 | 15 | 20,565 | 1.0163% | * | * | * |
1997 | 15 | 21,336 | 1.0698% | * | * | * |
1996 | 15 | 22,114 | 1.1053% | * | * | * |
1995 | 13 | 23,191 | 1.1546% | * | * | * |
1994 | 15 | 24,152 | 1.1867% | * | * | * |
1993 | 16 | 24,949 | 1.2097% | * | * | * |
1992 | 14 | 26,194 | 1.2498% | * | * | * |
1991 | 10 | 27,763 | 1.3114% | * | * | * |
1990 | 12 | 29,038 | 1.3515% | * | * | * |
1989 | 12 | 29,805 | 1.4238% | * | * | * |
1988 | 11 | 29,326 | 1.4686% | 986 | 167 | 0.0087% |
1987 | 11 | 29,514 | 1.5160% | 866 | 196 | 0.0105% |
1986 | 10 | 30,140 | 1.5718% | 774 | 220 | 0.0119% |
1985 | 9 | 31,445 | 1.6372% | 742 | 233 | 0.0126% |
1984 | 8 | 32,547 | 1.7381% | 703 | 237 | 0.0132% |
1983 | 9 | 33,127 | 1.7813% | 645 | 266 | 0.0149% |
1982 | 8 | 34,622 | 1.8388% | 729 | 234 | 0.0129% |
1981 | 8 | 34,844 | 1.8751% | 812 | 196 | 0.0110% |
1980 | 8 | 35,186 | 1.9017% | 688 | 251 | 0.0141% |
1979 | 7 | 35,361 | 1.9777% | 693 | 245 | 0.0142% |
1978 | 7 | 33,958 | 1.9919% | 716 | 221 | 0.0135% |
1977 | 7 | 34,145 | 2.0014% | 713 | 218 | 0.0133% |
1976 | 6 | 33,947 | 2.0825% | 702 | 210 | 0.0134% |
1975 | 7 | 35,027 | 2.1625% | 661 | 230 | 0.0147% |
1974 | 6 | 37,571 | 2.3080% | 617 | 252 | 0.0161% |
1973 | 6 | 39,128 | 2.4283% | 651 | 230 | 0.0148% |
1972 | 5 | 43,106 | 2.5780% | 669 | 225 | 0.0140% |
1971 | 4 | 51,429 | 2.8345% | 623 | 269 | 0.0154% |
1970 | 4 | 58,427 | 3.0719% | 598 | 293 | 0.0160% |
1969 | 4 | 58,756 | 3.2135% | 583 | 288 | 0.0163% |
1968 | 3 | 60,862 | 3.4300% | 558 | 303 | 0.0177% |
1967 | 4 | 61,572 | 3.4627% | 553 | 290 | 0.0169% |
1966 | 4 | 64,997 | 3.5789% | 565 | 283 | 0.0161% |
1965 | 2 | 71,521 | 3.7759% | 612 | 253 | 0.0138% |
1964 | 2 | 82,450 | 4.0707% | 616 | 265 | 0.0135% |
1963 | 2 | 78,623 | 3.8091% | 627 | 260 | 0.0131% |
1962 | 3 | 78,372 | 3.7314% | 587 | 284 | 0.0140% |
1961 | 3 | 79,789 | 3.7071% | 611 | 275 | 0.0133% |
1960 | 4 | 76,097 | 3.5152% | 649 | 242 | 0.0116% |
1959 | 4 | 76,405 | 3.5295% | 664 | 228 | 0.0110% |
1958 | 5 | 75,852 | 3.5279% | 687 | 206 | 0.0100% |
1957 | 5 | 78,878 | 3.6096% | 654 | 226 | 0.0108% |
1956 | 5 | 80,686 | 3.7668% | 642 | 219 | 0.0106% |
1955 | 5 | 79,974 | 3.8334% | 685 | 187 | 0.0093% |
1954 | 4 | 81,034 | 3.9218% | 680 | 188 | 0.0094% |
1953 | 4 | 79,944 | 4.0036% | 713 | 162 | 0.0084% |
1952 | 3 | 83,098 | 4.2117% | 634 | 196 | 0.0103% |
1951 | 3 | 81,261 | 4.2691% | 607 | 201 | 0.0109% |
1950 | 3 | 79,343 | 4.3638% | 639 | 179 | 0.0102% |
1949 | 3 | 80,899 | 4.5034% | 586 | 200 | 0.0114% |
1948 | 3 | 82,548 | 4.6433% | 605 | 192 | 0.0110% |
1947 | 3 | 88,105 | 4.7583% | 602 | 201 | 0.0111% |
1946 | 3 | 78,987 | 4.8049% | 548 | 209 | 0.0130% |
1945 | 3 | 66,069 | 4.8238% | 519 | 197 | 0.0146% |
1944 | 3 | 66,396 | 4.7960% | 545 | 176 | 0.0129% |
1943 | 3 | 68,637 | 4.7418% | 483 | 233 | 0.0163% |
1942 | 3 | 66,051 | 4.6885% | 477 | 238 | 0.0171% |
1941 | 3 | 57,471 | 4.5883% | 471 | 220 | 0.0177% |
1940 | 3 | 54,714 | 4.6136% | 463 | 208 | 0.0176% |
1939 | 3 | 51,068 | 4.5045% | 445 | 229 | 0.0202% |
1938 | 3 | 50,490 | 4.4460% | 457 | 216 | 0.0189% |
1937 | 3 | 48,677 | 4.4565% | 446 | 218 | 0.0198% |
1936 | 3 | 47,643 | 4.4815% | 446 | 204 | 0.0189% |
1935 | 3 | 47,466 | 4.4440% | 449 | 207 | 0.0191% |
1934 | 3 | 46,674 | 4.4011% | 410 | 255 | 0.0236% |
1933 | 3 | 46,137 | 4.5316% | 427 | 228 | 0.0218% |
1932 | 3 | 48,536 | 4.5244% | 373 | 297 | 0.0269% |
1931 | 3 | 48,333 | 4.5298% | 356 | 325 | 0.0295% |
1930 | 3 | 52,332 | 4.6426% | 327 | 402 | 0.0345% |
1929 | 3 | 51,991 | 4.7025% | 321 | 415 | 0.0359% |
1928 | 2 | 53,690 | 4.7122% | 324 | 421 | 0.0353% |
1927 | 2 | 55,855 | 4.8156% | 319 | 439 | 0.0355% |
1926 | 2 | 56,078 | 4.9012% | 335 | 390 | 0.0317% |
1925 | 2 | 57,099 | 4.9651% | 354 | 367 | 0.0291% |
1924 | 2 | 59,067 | 5.0554% | 349 | 380 | 0.0293% |
1923 | 1 | 57,447 | 5.0730% | 363 | 334 | 0.0267% |
1922 | 1 | 57,266 | 5.0872% | 384 | 287 | 0.0230% |
1921 | 1 | 58,185 | 5.1164% | 399 | 287 | 0.0224% |
1920 | 1 | 56,909 | 5.1702% | 395 | 280 | 0.0225% |
1919 | 1 | 53,559 | 5.2723% | 370 | 306 | 0.0261% |
1918 | 1 | 56,644 | 5.3938% | 419 | 248 | 0.0206% |
1917 | 1 | 51,873 | 5.4072% | 397 | 254 | 0.0226% |
1916 | 1 | 50,050 | 5.4198% | 412 | 227 | 0.0209% |
1915 | 1 | 47,572 | 5.3977% | 431 | 199 | 0.0195% |
1914 | 1 | 37,935 | 5.5543% | 408 | 169 | 0.0213% |
1913 | 1 | 29,283 | 5.4664% | 448 | 122 | 0.0187% |
1912 | 1 | 24,572 | 5.4485% | 445 | 112 | 0.0191% |
1911 | 1 | 13,418 | 5.5708% | 504 | 68 | 0.0154% |
1910 | 1 | 11,440 | 5.4954% | 421 | 88 | 0.0210% |
1909 | 1 | 9,579 | 5.4239% | 459 | 67 | 0.0182% |
1908 | 1 | 9,343 | 5.6193% | 475 | 58 | 0.0164% |
1907 | 1 | 8,978 | 5.6639% | 445 | 65 | 0.0193% |
1906 | 1 | 8,266 | 5.7382% | 522 | 44 | 0.0140% |
1905 | 1 | 8,065 | 5.6296% | 534 | 42 | 0.0136% |
1904 | 1 | 8,108 | 5.8537% | 524 | 40 | 0.0137% |
1903 | 1 | 7,609 | 5.8822% | 507 | 40 | 0.0144% |
1902 | 1 | 7,909 | 5.9565% | 521 | 38 | 0.0136% |
1901 | 1 | 6,896 | 5.9636% | 485 | 39 | 0.0153% |
1900 | 1 | 9,849 | 6.0591% | 502 | 46 | 0.0145% |
1899 | 1 | 6,993 | 6.0693% | 462 | 40 | 0.0162% |
1898 | 1 | 8,163 | 6.1770% | 416 | 55 | 0.0201% |
1897 | 1 | 7,552 | 6.1911% | 433 | 46 | 0.0185% |
1896 | 1 | 8,140 | 6.3048% | 408 | 50 | 0.0198% |
1895 | 1 | 8,323 | 6.5704% | 360 | 61 | 0.0247% |
1894 | 1 | 8,241 | 6.5969% | 362 | 60 | 0.0254% |
1893 | 1 | 8,050 | 6.6488% | 343 | 61 | 0.0271% |
1892 | 1 | 9,039 | 6.8749% | 363 | 54 | 0.0240% |
1891 | 1 | 7,681 | 7.0287% | 379 | 44 | 0.0224% |
1890 | 1 | 8,503 | 7.1025% | 347 | 55 | 0.0273% |
1889 | 1 | 8,548 | 7.1794% | 346 | 52 | 0.0275% |
1888 | 1 | 9,248 | 7.1181% | 333 | 52 | 0.0274% |
1887 | 1 | 8,110 | 7.4182% | 286 | 56 | 0.0360% |
1886 | 1 | 9,026 | 7.5814% | 300 | 48 | 0.0312% |
1885 | 1 | 8,756 | 7.5514% | 297 | 45 | 0.0317% |
1884 | 1 | 9,387 | 7.6473% | 309 | 40 | 0.0291% |
1883 | 1 | 8,896 | 7.9079% | 279 | 40 | 0.0333% |
1882 | 1 | 9,557 | 7.8303% | 278 | 40 | 0.0346% |
1881 | 1 | 8,771 | 8.0981% | 313 | 26 | 0.0263% |
1880 | 1 | 9,654 | 8.1522% | 229 | 46 | 0.0471% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |