Jarvis: Statistics About The Baby Name Jarvis
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
2007 | 901 | 218 | 0.0100% | * | * | * |
2006 | 1000 | 181 | 0.0084% | * | * | * |
2005 | 937 | 183 | 0.0088% | * | * | * |
2004 | 982 | 167 | 0.0080% | * | * | * |
2003 | 891 | 188 | 0.0090% | * | * | * |
2002 | 959 | 166 | 0.0081% | * | * | * |
2001 | 814 | 203 | 0.0098% | * | * | * |
2000 | 765 | 217 | 0.0104% | * | * | * |
1999 | 700 | 239 | 0.0117% | * | * | * |
1998 | 691 | 244 | 0.0121% | * | * | * |
1997 | 635 | 266 | 0.0133% | * | * | * |
1996 | 593 | 303 | 0.0151% | * | * | * |
1995 | 592 | 300 | 0.0149% | * | * | * |
1994 | 455 | 482 | 0.0237% | * | * | * |
1993 | 467 | 451 | 0.0219% | * | * | * |
1992 | 490 | 419 | 0.0200% | * | * | * |
1991 | 428 | 521 | 0.0246% | * | * | * |
1990 | 435 | 509 | 0.0237% | * | * | * |
1989 | 359 | 635 | 0.0303% | * | * | * |
1988 | 347 | 599 | 0.0300% | * | * | * |
1987 | 385 | 497 | 0.0255% | * | * | * |
1986 | 355 | 533 | 0.0278% | * | * | * |
1985 | 385 | 462 | 0.0241% | * | * | * |
1984 | 378 | 466 | 0.0249% | * | * | * |
1983 | 378 | 452 | 0.0243% | * | * | * |
1982 | 425 | 387 | 0.0206% | * | * | * |
1981 | 409 | 402 | 0.0216% | * | * | * |
1980 | 455 | 340 | 0.0184% | * | * | * |
1979 | 482 | 295 | 0.0165% | * | * | * |
1978 | 498 | 263 | 0.0154% | * | * | * |
1977 | 507 | 260 | 0.0152% | * | * | * |
1976 | 594 | 187 | 0.0115% | * | * | * |
1975 | 552 | 212 | 0.0131% | * | * | * |
1974 | 582 | 186 | 0.0114% | * | * | * |
1973 | 614 | 167 | 0.0104% | * | * | * |
1972 | 626 | 158 | 0.0094% | * | * | * |
1971 | 634 | 169 | 0.0093% | * | * | * |
1970 | 693 | 143 | 0.0075% | * | * | * |
1969 | 754 | 107 | 0.0059% | * | * | * |
1968 | 724 | 107 | 0.0060% | * | * | * |
1967 | 769 | 90 | 0.0051% | * | * | * |
1966 | 871 | 70 | 0.0039% | * | * | * |
1965 | 776 | 91 | 0.0048% | * | * | * |
1964 | 794 | 90 | 0.0044% | * | * | * |
1963 | 788 | 94 | 0.0046% | * | * | * |
1962 | 787 | 94 | 0.0045% | * | * | * |
1961 | 791 | 93 | 0.0043% | * | * | * |
1960 | 732 | 111 | 0.0051% | * | * | * |
1959 | 699 | 121 | 0.0056% | * | * | * |
1958 | 686 | 121 | 0.0056% | * | * | * |
1957 | 679 | 126 | 0.0058% | * | * | * |
1956 | 792 | 88 | 0.0041% | * | * | * |
1955 | 759 | 92 | 0.0044% | * | * | * |
1954 | 832 | 76 | 0.0037% | * | * | * |
1953 | 857 | 70 | 0.0035% | * | * | * |
1952 | 865 | 66 | 0.0033% | * | * | * |
1951 | 867 | 65 | 0.0034% | * | * | * |
1950 | 951 | 53 | 0.0029% | * | * | * |
1941 | 968 | 44 | 0.0035% | * | * | * |
1938 | 843 | 55 | 0.0048% | * | * | * |
1937 | 886 | 49 | 0.0045% | * | * | * |
1933 | 901 | 48 | 0.0047% | * | * | * |
1931 | 916 | 50 | 0.0047% | * | * | * |
1927 | 953 | 53 | 0.0046% | * | * | * |
1922 | 936 | 56 | 0.0050% | * | * | * |
1918 | 969 | 48 | 0.0046% | * | * | * |
1917 | 926 | 48 | 0.0050% | * | * | * |
1910 | 957 | 12 | 0.0058% | * | * | * |
1905 | 875 | 9 | 0.0063% | * | * | * |
1902 | 978 | 7 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
1898 | 938 | 7 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
1896 | 936 | 7 | 0.0054% | * | * | * |
1892 | 906 | 7 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
1889 | 927 | 6 | 0.0050% | * | * | * |
1888 | 869 | 7 | 0.0054% | * | * | * |
1886 | 807 | 7 | 0.0059% | * | * | * |
1884 | 816 | 7 | 0.0057% | * | * | * |
1883 | 505 | 13 | 0.0116% | * | * | * |
1882 | 894 | 6 | 0.0049% | * | * | * |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |