
Janice: Statistics About The Baby Name Janice
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls | 
| 2009 | * | * | * | 838 | 330 | 0.0165% | 
| 2007 | * | * | * | 946 | 282 | 0.0135% | 
| 2006 | * | * | * | 994 | 257 | 0.0125% | 
| 2004 | * | * | * | 856 | 283 | 0.0142% | 
| 2003 | * | * | * | 953 | 245 | 0.0123% | 
| 2002 | * | * | * | 747 | 323 | 0.0164% | 
| 2001 | * | * | * | 843 | 271 | 0.0137% | 
| 2000 | * | * | * | 742 | 310 | 0.0156% | 
| 1999 | * | * | * | 753 | 298 | 0.0153% | 
| 1998 | * | * | * | 710 | 311 | 0.0161% | 
| 1997 | * | * | * | 693 | 310 | 0.0163% | 
| 1996 | * | * | * | 654 | 339 | 0.0177% | 
| 1995 | * | * | * | 613 | 362 | 0.0189% | 
| 1994 | * | * | * | 562 | 419 | 0.0215% | 
| 1993 | * | * | * | 530 | 453 | 0.0230% | 
| 1992 | * | * | * | 515 | 462 | 0.0231% | 
| 1991 | * | * | * | 493 | 485 | 0.0239% | 
| 1990 | * | * | * | 476 | 514 | 0.0251% | 
| 1989 | * | * | * | 445 | 547 | 0.0275% | 
| 1988 | * | * | * | 380 | 630 | 0.0328% | 
| 1987 | * | * | * | 353 | 669 | 0.0357% | 
| 1986 | * | * | * | 360 | 658 | 0.0357% | 
| 1985 | * | * | * | 342 | 687 | 0.0373% | 
| 1984 | * | * | * | 314 | 753 | 0.0418% | 
| 1983 | * | * | * | 301 | 769 | 0.0430% | 
| 1982 | * | * | * | 276 | 880 | 0.0486% | 
| 1981 | * | * | * | 277 | 888 | 0.0497% | 
| 1980 | * | * | * | 257 | 1,002 | 0.0564% | 
| 1979 | * | * | * | 238 | 1,081 | 0.0628% | 
| 1978 | * | * | * | 216 | 1,162 | 0.0708% | 
| 1977 | * | * | * | 215 | 1,143 | 0.0696% | 
| 1976 | * | * | * | 212 | 1,156 | 0.0736% | 
| 1975 | * | * | * | 191 | 1,307 | 0.0838% | 
| 1974 | * | * | * | 192 | 1,324 | 0.0846% | 
| 1973 | * | * | * | 182 | 1,479 | 0.0952% | 
| 1972 | * | * | * | 171 | 1,720 | 0.1067% | 
| 1971 | * | * | * | 150 | 2,150 | 0.1228% | 
| 1970 | * | * | * | 145 | 2,344 | 0.1280% | 
| 1969 | * | * | * | 131 | 2,637 | 0.1497% | 
| 1968 | * | * | * | 109 | 3,050 | 0.1785% | 
| 1967 | * | * | * | 98 | 3,520 | 0.2051% | 
| 1966 | * | * | * | 80 | 4,344 | 0.2475% | 
| 1965 | * | * | * | 73 | 5,034 | 0.2756% | 
| 1964 | * | * | * | 69 | 6,168 | 0.3153% | 
| 1963 | * | * | * | 63 | 7,069 | 0.3557% | 
| 1962 | * | * | * | 58 | 7,822 | 0.3860% | 
| 1961 | * | * | * | 52 | 8,711 | 0.4199% | 
| 1960 | * | * | * | 41 | 9,621 | 0.4627% | 
| 1959 | * | * | * | 37 | 10,489 | 0.5048% | 
| 1958 | * | * | * | 35 | 10,875 | 0.5269% | 
| 1957 | * | * | * | 32 | 11,960 | 0.5704% | 
| 1956 | * | * | * | 26 | 13,013 | 0.6321% | 
| 1955 | * | * | * | 25 | 13,165 | 0.6571% | 
| 1954 | * | * | * | 25 | 13,520 | 0.6793% | 
| 1953 | * | * | * | 22 | 14,602 | 0.7576% | 
| 1952 | * | * | * | 23 | 14,971 | 0.7871% | 
| 1951 | * | * | * | 21 | 15,922 | 0.8637% | 
| 1950 | * | * | * | 22 | 15,003 | 0.8534% | 
| 1949 | * | * | * | 24 | 14,433 | 0.8228% | 
| 1948 | * | * | * | 23 | 14,150 | 0.8127% | 
| 1947 | * | * | * | 22 | 15,396 | 0.8478% | 
| 1946 | * | * | * | 22 | 14,023 | 0.8711% | 
| 1945 | * | * | * | 24 | 10,767 | 0.7999% | 
| 1944 | * | * | * | 28 | 9,722 | 0.7122% | 
| 1943 | * | * | * | 26 | 10,643 | 0.7433% | 
| 1942 | 989 | 46 | 0.0033% | 25 | 10,286 | 0.7391% | 
| 1941 | * | * | * | 22 | 10,058 | 0.8080% | 
| 1940 | 931 | 47 | 0.0040% | 22 | 9,315 | 0.7886% | 
| 1939 | * | * | * | 24 | 8,780 | 0.7742% | 
| 1938 | * | * | * | 24 | 8,710 | 0.7633% | 
| 1937 | * | * | * | 25 | 7,764 | 0.7050% | 
| 1936 | * | * | * | 31 | 6,146 | 0.5707% | 
| 1935 | * | * | * | 47 | 4,444 | 0.4091% | 
| 1934 | * | * | * | 68 | 3,582 | 0.3311% | 
| 1933 | * | * | * | 81 | 3,063 | 0.2930% | 
| 1932 | * | * | * | 94 | 2,628 | 0.2376% | 
| 1931 | * | * | * | 104 | 2,288 | 0.2075% | 
| 1930 | * | * | * | 126 | 1,927 | 0.1653% | 
| 1929 | * | * | * | 137 | 1,688 | 0.1459% | 
| 1928 | * | * | * | 149 | 1,569 | 0.1314% | 
| 1927 | * | * | * | 159 | 1,468 | 0.1188% | 
| 1926 | * | * | * | 159 | 1,472 | 0.1198% | 
| 1925 | * | * | * | 157 | 1,509 | 0.1195% | 
| 1924 | * | * | * | 187 | 1,175 | 0.0907% | 
| 1923 | * | * | * | 232 | 789 | 0.0630% | 
| 1922 | * | * | * | 239 | 745 | 0.0597% | 
| 1921 | * | * | * | 246 | 731 | 0.0572% | 
| 1920 | * | * | * | 254 | 670 | 0.0539% | 
| 1919 | * | * | * | 264 | 589 | 0.0501% | 
| 1918 | * | * | * | 280 | 509 | 0.0423% | 
| 1917 | * | * | * | 289 | 455 | 0.0405% | 
| 1916 | * | * | * | 314 | 372 | 0.0343% | 
| 1915 | * | * | * | 353 | 287 | 0.0281% | 
| 1914 | * | * | * | 353 | 225 | 0.0283% | 
| 1913 | * | * | * | 385 | 156 | 0.0239% | 
| 1912 | * | * | * | 385 | 143 | 0.0244% | 
| 1911 | * | * | * | 377 | 116 | 0.0263% | 
| 1910 | * | * | * | 419 | 89 | 0.0213% | 
| 1909 | * | * | * | 418 | 77 | 0.0210% | 
| 1908 | * | * | * | 471 | 59 | 0.0167% | 
| 1907 | * | * | * | 580 | 40 | 0.0119% | 
| 1906 | * | * | * | 480 | 51 | 0.0163% | 
| 1905 | * | * | * | 533 | 42 | 0.0136% | 
| 1904 | * | * | * | 566 | 36 | 0.0123% | 
| 1903 | * | * | * | 552 | 35 | 0.0126% | 
| 1902 | * | * | * | 483 | 43 | 0.0153% | 
| 1901 | * | * | * | 525 | 34 | 0.0134% | 
| 1900 | * | * | * | 564 | 38 | 0.0119% | 
| 1899 | * | * | * | 920 | 13 | 0.0053% | 
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
