James: Statistics About The Baby Name James
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
2023 | 4 | 11,670 | 0.6373% | * | * | * |
2022 | 4 | 12,028 | 0.6454% | * | * | * |
2021 | 5 | 12,367 | 0.6647% | * | * | * |
2020 | 6 | 12,343 | 0.6694% | * | * | * |
2019 | 6 | 13,087 | 0.6856% | * | * | * |
2018 | 4 | 13,525 | 0.7012% | * | * | * |
2017 | 4 | 14,232 | 0.7249% | * | * | * |
2016 | 5 | 14,842 | 0.7356% | * | * | * |
2015 | 7 | 14,705 | 0.7255% | * | * | * |
2014 | 9 | 14,301 | 0.7046% | * | * | * |
2013 | 13 | 13,416 | 0.6706% | * | * | * |
2012 | 14 | 13,271 | 0.6604% | * | * | * |
2011 | 17 | 13,133 | 0.6525% | * | * | * |
2010 | 19 | 13,714 | 0.6743% | * | * | * |
2009 | 18 | 14,022 | 0.6690% | * | * | * |
2008 | 17 | 14,952 | 0.6952% | * | * | * |
2007 | 15 | 15,708 | 0.7205% | * | * | * |
2006 | 16 | 15,945 | 0.7397% | * | * | * |
2005 | 17 | 15,773 | 0.7557% | * | * | * |
2004 | 17 | 16,166 | 0.7773% | * | * | * |
2003 | 18 | 16,752 | 0.8023% | * | * | * |
2002 | 18 | 16,859 | 0.8194% | * | * | * |
2001 | 19 | 16,988 | 0.8243% | * | * | * |
2000 | 18 | 17,927 | 0.8610% | * | * | * |
1999 | 19 | 18,504 | 0.9097% | * | * | * |
1998 | 18 | 19,649 | 0.9710% | * | * | * |
1997 | 17 | 20,386 | 1.0222% | * | * | * |
1996 | 17 | 21,141 | 1.0567% | * | * | * |
1995 | 17 | 22,698 | 1.1301% | * | * | * |
1994 | 14 | 24,739 | 1.2155% | * | * | * |
1993 | 14 | 26,237 | 1.2721% | * | * | * |
1992 | 9 | 28,491 | 1.3594% | * | * | * |
1991 | 7 | 30,481 | 1.4398% | * | * | * |
1990 | 8 | 32,329 | 1.5047% | * | * | * |
1989 | 9 | 32,709 | 1.5625% | 982 | 176 | 0.0088% |
1988 | 9 | 32,469 | 1.6260% | 771 | 242 | 0.0126% |
1987 | 8 | 32,600 | 1.6746% | 731 | 247 | 0.0132% |
1986 | 7 | 34,005 | 1.7734% | 673 | 273 | 0.0148% |
1985 | 7 | 35,822 | 1.8651% | 645 | 287 | 0.0156% |
1984 | 7 | 35,796 | 1.9116% | 696 | 239 | 0.0133% |
1983 | 6 | 36,292 | 1.9515% | 618 | 283 | 0.0158% |
1982 | 6 | 38,830 | 2.0623% | 580 | 314 | 0.0173% |
1981 | 7 | 38,234 | 2.0576% | 652 | 271 | 0.0152% |
1980 | 5 | 39,252 | 2.1214% | 663 | 271 | 0.0152% |
1979 | 5 | 39,333 | 2.1998% | 665 | 262 | 0.0152% |
1978 | 5 | 39,837 | 2.3368% | 626 | 268 | 0.0163% |
1977 | 5 | 39,966 | 2.3426% | 615 | 273 | 0.0166% |
1976 | 5 | 38,266 | 2.3474% | 615 | 254 | 0.0162% |
1975 | 4 | 39,539 | 2.4411% | 621 | 253 | 0.0162% |
1974 | 5 | 41,321 | 2.5384% | 614 | 253 | 0.0162% |
1973 | 4 | 42,833 | 2.6582% | 531 | 316 | 0.0203% |
1972 | 3 | 47,057 | 2.8142% | 556 | 297 | 0.0184% |
1971 | 2 | 54,529 | 3.0054% | 581 | 300 | 0.0171% |
1970 | 2 | 61,692 | 3.2435% | 531 | 356 | 0.0194% |
1969 | 3 | 59,931 | 3.2778% | 545 | 328 | 0.0186% |
1968 | 4 | 60,700 | 3.4209% | 552 | 309 | 0.0181% |
1967 | 3 | 61,670 | 3.4682% | 533 | 312 | 0.0182% |
1966 | 3 | 65,161 | 3.5879% | 551 | 295 | 0.0168% |
1965 | 4 | 67,656 | 3.5719% | 545 | 302 | 0.0165% |
1964 | 4 | 72,977 | 3.6030% | 557 | 315 | 0.0161% |
1963 | 4 | 71,295 | 3.4541% | 550 | 310 | 0.0156% |
1962 | 4 | 72,500 | 3.4518% | 618 | 263 | 0.0130% |
1961 | 4 | 75,773 | 3.5206% | 599 | 284 | 0.0137% |
1960 | 3 | 76,820 | 3.5486% | 582 | 288 | 0.0138% |
1959 | 3 | 78,506 | 3.6265% | 571 | 294 | 0.0141% |
1958 | 3 | 78,696 | 3.6602% | 620 | 253 | 0.0123% |
1957 | 2 | 84,149 | 3.8508% | 579 | 278 | 0.0133% |
1956 | 2 | 84,777 | 3.9578% | 595 | 253 | 0.0123% |
1955 | 3 | 84,060 | 4.0293% | 591 | 242 | 0.0121% |
1954 | 2 | 86,206 | 4.1722% | 599 | 229 | 0.0115% |
1953 | 2 | 85,809 | 4.2973% | 576 | 236 | 0.0122% |
1952 | 1 | 87,059 | 4.4125% | 529 | 259 | 0.0136% |
1951 | 1 | 86,931 | 4.5670% | 514 | 261 | 0.0142% |
1950 | 1 | 86,021 | 4.7311% | 512 | 252 | 0.0143% |
1949 | 1 | 86,656 | 4.8238% | 505 | 258 | 0.0147% |
1948 | 1 | 88,337 | 4.9690% | 519 | 253 | 0.0145% |
1947 | 1 | 94,475 | 5.1023% | 518 | 256 | 0.0141% |
1946 | 1 | 87,094 | 5.2981% | 493 | 248 | 0.0154% |
1945 | 1 | 74,346 | 5.4281% | 452 | 251 | 0.0186% |
1944 | 1 | 76,689 | 5.5395% | 472 | 228 | 0.0167% |
1943 | 1 | 79,838 | 5.5156% | 452 | 269 | 0.0188% |
1942 | 1 | 77,294 | 5.4865% | 429 | 285 | 0.0205% |
1941 | 1 | 66,618 | 5.3185% | 428 | 256 | 0.0206% |
1940 | 1 | 62,441 | 5.2651% | 423 | 261 | 0.0221% |
1939 | 1 | 59,677 | 5.2638% | 414 | 267 | 0.0235% |
1938 | 2 | 59,054 | 5.2002% | 406 | 272 | 0.0238% |
1937 | 2 | 56,521 | 5.1747% | 406 | 253 | 0.0230% |
1936 | 2 | 54,604 | 5.1363% | 428 | 229 | 0.0213% |
1935 | 2 | 54,916 | 5.1415% | 422 | 238 | 0.0219% |
1934 | 2 | 54,188 | 5.1097% | 400 | 264 | 0.0244% |
1933 | 2 | 51,037 | 5.0129% | 369 | 297 | 0.0284% |
1932 | 2 | 51,858 | 4.8341% | 356 | 319 | 0.0288% |
1931 | 2 | 51,044 | 4.7838% | 343 | 347 | 0.0315% |
1930 | 2 | 53,853 | 4.7776% | 323 | 419 | 0.0360% |
1929 | 2 | 52,064 | 4.7091% | 325 | 395 | 0.0341% |
1928 | 3 | 52,692 | 4.6246% | 318 | 430 | 0.0360% |
1927 | 3 | 53,530 | 4.6151% | 339 | 389 | 0.0315% |
1926 | 3 | 53,127 | 4.6433% | 351 | 362 | 0.0295% |
1925 | 4 | 52,629 | 4.5764% | 357 | 365 | 0.0289% |
1924 | 4 | 52,902 | 4.5278% | 421 | 275 | 0.0212% |
1923 | 4 | 50,492 | 4.4588% | 401 | 280 | 0.0224% |
1922 | 4 | 49,824 | 4.4261% | 430 | 241 | 0.0193% |
1921 | 4 | 49,746 | 4.3743% | 456 | 231 | 0.0181% |
1920 | 4 | 47,952 | 4.3565% | 425 | 248 | 0.0199% |
1919 | 3 | 42,440 | 4.1778% | 482 | 191 | 0.0163% |
1918 | 3 | 42,202 | 4.0186% | 461 | 212 | 0.0176% |
1917 | 3 | 37,323 | 3.8905% | 486 | 182 | 0.0162% |
1916 | 3 | 35,592 | 3.8542% | 506 | 166 | 0.0153% |
1915 | 3 | 33,793 | 3.8342% | 495 | 155 | 0.0151% |
1914 | 3 | 26,266 | 3.8458% | 546 | 106 | 0.0133% |
1913 | 3 | 20,815 | 3.8857% | 525 | 94 | 0.0144% |
1912 | 3 | 17,632 | 3.9097% | 545 | 81 | 0.0138% |
1911 | 3 | 9,942 | 4.1277% | 503 | 68 | 0.0154% |
1910 | 2 | 9,185 | 4.4121% | 513 | 64 | 0.0153% |
1909 | 3 | 7,584 | 4.2943% | 525 | 52 | 0.0142% |
1908 | 3 | 7,007 | 4.2143% | 684 | 32 | 0.0090% |
1907 | 3 | 6,706 | 4.2306% | 540 | 45 | 0.0133% |
1906 | 3 | 5,912 | 4.1041% | 581 | 37 | 0.0118% |
1905 | 3 | 6,043 | 4.2182% | 590 | 35 | 0.0113% |
1904 | 3 | 5,860 | 4.2307% | 675 | 27 | 0.0092% |
1903 | 3 | 5,484 | 4.2395% | 636 | 28 | 0.0101% |
1902 | 3 | 5,590 | 4.2100% | 607 | 30 | 0.0107% |
1901 | 3 | 4,735 | 4.0948% | 567 | 30 | 0.0118% |
1900 | 3 | 7,262 | 4.4676% | 527 | 41 | 0.0129% |
1899 | 3 | 4,600 | 3.9924% | 600 | 27 | 0.0109% |
1898 | 3 | 5,321 | 4.0265% | 601 | 29 | 0.0106% |
1897 | 3 | 5,115 | 4.1932% | 543 | 30 | 0.0121% |
1896 | 3 | 5,209 | 4.0346% | 587 | 28 | 0.0111% |
1895 | 3 | 5,336 | 4.2124% | 506 | 34 | 0.0138% |
1894 | 3 | 5,111 | 4.0913% | 588 | 25 | 0.0106% |
1893 | 3 | 5,028 | 4.1528% | 606 | 23 | 0.0102% |
1892 | 3 | 5,400 | 4.1071% | 605 | 22 | 0.0098% |
1891 | 3 | 4,517 | 4.1334% | 464 | 31 | 0.0158% |
1890 | 3 | 5,097 | 4.2575% | 452 | 33 | 0.0164% |
1889 | 3 | 5,021 | 4.2171% | 492 | 26 | 0.0137% |
1888 | 3 | 5,563 | 4.2818% | 359 | 45 | 0.0238% |
1887 | 3 | 4,768 | 4.3613% | 518 | 19 | 0.0122% |
1886 | 3 | 5,355 | 4.4979% | 403 | 29 | 0.0189% |
1885 | 3 | 5,177 | 4.4648% | 408 | 26 | 0.0183% |
1884 | 3 | 5,695 | 4.6395% | 343 | 33 | 0.0240% |
1883 | 3 | 5,225 | 4.6447% | 367 | 25 | 0.0208% |
1882 | 3 | 5,892 | 4.8275% | 438 | 18 | 0.0156% |
1881 | 3 | 5,443 | 5.0254% | 330 | 24 | 0.0243% |
1880 | 3 | 5,927 | 5.0050% | 344 | 22 | 0.0225% |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |