Ismael: Statistics About The Baby Name Ismael
Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
2023 | 244 | 1,421 | 0.0776% | * | * | * |
2022 | 312 | 1,072 | 0.0575% | * | * | * |
2021 | 351 | 919 | 0.0494% | * | * | * |
2020 | 349 | 904 | 0.0490% | * | * | * |
2019 | 365 | 871 | 0.0456% | * | * | * |
2018 | 358 | 915 | 0.0474% | * | * | * |
2017 | 391 | 809 | 0.0412% | * | * | * |
2016 | 402 | 791 | 0.0392% | * | * | * |
2015 | 401 | 767 | 0.0378% | * | * | * |
2014 | 384 | 805 | 0.0397% | * | * | * |
2013 | 400 | 741 | 0.0370% | * | * | * |
2012 | 382 | 774 | 0.0385% | * | * | * |
2011 | 377 | 784 | 0.0390% | * | * | * |
2010 | 362 | 821 | 0.0404% | * | * | * |
2009 | 356 | 859 | 0.0410% | * | * | * |
2008 | 349 | 926 | 0.0431% | * | * | * |
2007 | 327 | 966 | 0.0443% | * | * | * |
2006 | 327 | 971 | 0.0450% | * | * | * |
2005 | 336 | 881 | 0.0422% | * | * | * |
2004 | 332 | 897 | 0.0431% | * | * | * |
2003 | 332 | 867 | 0.0415% | * | * | * |
2002 | 339 | 807 | 0.0392% | * | * | * |
2001 | 323 | 865 | 0.0420% | * | * | * |
2000 | 340 | 802 | 0.0385% | * | * | * |
1999 | 337 | 784 | 0.0385% | * | * | * |
1998 | 351 | 744 | 0.0368% | * | * | * |
1997 | 370 | 658 | 0.0330% | * | * | * |
1996 | 336 | 771 | 0.0385% | * | * | * |
1995 | 342 | 716 | 0.0356% | * | * | * |
1994 | 371 | 641 | 0.0315% | * | * | * |
1993 | 372 | 635 | 0.0308% | * | * | * |
1992 | 382 | 601 | 0.0287% | * | * | * |
1991 | 373 | 614 | 0.0290% | * | * | * |
1990 | 414 | 556 | 0.0259% | * | * | * |
1989 | 444 | 450 | 0.0215% | * | * | * |
1988 | 414 | 474 | 0.0237% | * | * | * |
1987 | 419 | 436 | 0.0224% | * | * | * |
1986 | 407 | 443 | 0.0231% | * | * | * |
1985 | 419 | 415 | 0.0216% | * | * | * |
1984 | 425 | 380 | 0.0203% | * | * | * |
1983 | 393 | 425 | 0.0229% | * | * | * |
1982 | 386 | 435 | 0.0231% | * | * | * |
1981 | 408 | 403 | 0.0217% | * | * | * |
1980 | 422 | 385 | 0.0208% | * | * | * |
1979 | 391 | 419 | 0.0234% | * | * | * |
1978 | 433 | 338 | 0.0198% | * | * | * |
1977 | 440 | 325 | 0.0191% | * | * | * |
1976 | 414 | 348 | 0.0213% | * | * | * |
1975 | 457 | 306 | 0.0189% | * | * | * |
1974 | 411 | 361 | 0.0222% | * | * | * |
1973 | 470 | 279 | 0.0173% | * | * | * |
1972 | 468 | 281 | 0.0168% | * | * | * |
1971 | 475 | 289 | 0.0159% | * | * | * |
1970 | 469 | 297 | 0.0156% | * | * | * |
1969 | 488 | 247 | 0.0135% | * | * | * |
1968 | 478 | 253 | 0.0143% | * | * | * |
1967 | 507 | 221 | 0.0124% | * | * | * |
1966 | 498 | 231 | 0.0127% | * | * | * |
1965 | 541 | 200 | 0.0106% | * | * | * |
1964 | 530 | 218 | 0.0108% | * | * | * |
1963 | 540 | 214 | 0.0104% | * | * | * |
1962 | 521 | 232 | 0.0110% | * | * | * |
1961 | 590 | 179 | 0.0083% | * | * | * |
1960 | 546 | 209 | 0.0097% | * | * | * |
1959 | 553 | 197 | 0.0091% | * | * | * |
1958 | 561 | 191 | 0.0089% | * | * | * |
1957 | 563 | 187 | 0.0086% | * | * | * |
1956 | 523 | 205 | 0.0096% | * | * | * |
1955 | 579 | 161 | 0.0077% | * | * | * |
1954 | 582 | 161 | 0.0078% | * | * | * |
1953 | 553 | 163 | 0.0082% | * | * | * |
1952 | 578 | 144 | 0.0073% | * | * | * |
1951 | 590 | 138 | 0.0072% | * | * | * |
1950 | 592 | 132 | 0.0073% | * | * | * |
1949 | 597 | 130 | 0.0072% | * | * | * |
1948 | 630 | 116 | 0.0065% | * | * | * |
1947 | 682 | 103 | 0.0056% | * | * | * |
1946 | 667 | 94 | 0.0057% | * | * | * |
1945 | 686 | 78 | 0.0057% | * | * | * |
1944 | 697 | 80 | 0.0058% | * | * | * |
1943 | 967 | 48 | 0.0033% | * | * | * |
1942 | 801 | 65 | 0.0046% | * | * | * |
1941 | 834 | 58 | 0.0046% | * | * | * |
1940 | 999 | 42 | 0.0035% | * | * | * |
1939 | 831 | 54 | 0.0048% | * | * | * |
1938 | 814 | 58 | 0.0051% | * | * | * |
1937 | 885 | 49 | 0.0045% | * | * | * |
1935 | 872 | 52 | 0.0049% | * | * | * |
1933 | 746 | 67 | 0.0066% | * | * | * |
1932 | 848 | 57 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
1931 | 703 | 74 | 0.0069% | * | * | * |
1930 | 733 | 75 | 0.0067% | * | * | * |
1929 | 884 | 57 | 0.0052% | * | * | * |
1928 | 944 | 52 | 0.0046% | * | * | * |
* No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. |