
Isiah: Statistics About The Baby Name Isiah
| Year | Boy Rank | # Boys | % Boys | Girl Rank | # Girls | % Girls |
| 2013 | 824 | 259 | 0.0129% | * | * | * |
| 2012 | 775 | 290 | 0.0144% | * | * | * |
| 2011 | 639 | 362 | 0.0180% | * | * | * |
| 2010 | 596 | 416 | 0.0205% | * | * | * |
| 2009 | 534 | 493 | 0.0235% | * | * | * |
| 2008 | 446 | 625 | 0.0291% | * | * | * |
| 2007 | 447 | 616 | 0.0283% | * | * | * |
| 2006 | 406 | 717 | 0.0333% | * | * | * |
| 2005 | 390 | 726 | 0.0348% | * | * | * |
| 2004 | 384 | 704 | 0.0339% | * | * | * |
| 2003 | 365 | 730 | 0.0350% | * | * | * |
| 2002 | 358 | 742 | 0.0361% | * | * | * |
| 2001 | 336 | 819 | 0.0397% | * | * | * |
| 2000 | 342 | 797 | 0.0383% | * | * | * |
| 1999 | 342 | 779 | 0.0383% | * | * | * |
| 1998 | 348 | 767 | 0.0379% | * | * | * |
| 1997 | 345 | 741 | 0.0372% | * | * | * |
| 1996 | 365 | 657 | 0.0328% | * | * | * |
| 1995 | 461 | 489 | 0.0243% | * | * | * |
| 1994 | 541 | 359 | 0.0176% | * | * | * |
| 1993 | 570 | 323 | 0.0157% | * | * | * |
| 1992 | 512 | 393 | 0.0188% | * | * | * |
| 1991 | 467 | 448 | 0.0212% | * | * | * |
| 1990 | 433 | 510 | 0.0237% | * | * | * |
| 1989 | 466 | 409 | 0.0195% | * | * | * |
| 1988 | 525 | 302 | 0.0151% | * | * | * |
| 1987 | 640 | 205 | 0.0105% | * | * | * |
| 1986 | 884 | 106 | 0.0055% | * | * | * |
| 1985 | 774 | 130 | 0.0068% | * | * | * |
| 1984 | 793 | 120 | 0.0064% | * | * | * |
| 1983 | 865 | 103 | 0.0055% | * | * | * |
| 1982 | 831 | 115 | 0.0061% | * | * | * |
| 1981 | 895 | 99 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
| 1968 | 894 | 65 | 0.0037% | * | * | * |
| 1967 | 820 | 77 | 0.0043% | * | * | * |
| 1966 | 874 | 69 | 0.0038% | * | * | * |
| 1964 | 788 | 91 | 0.0045% | * | * | * |
| 1963 | 933 | 65 | 0.0031% | * | * | * |
| 1962 | 902 | 71 | 0.0034% | * | * | * |
| 1961 | 871 | 77 | 0.0036% | * | * | * |
| 1960 | 956 | 63 | 0.0029% | * | * | * |
| 1959 | 766 | 99 | 0.0046% | * | * | * |
| 1958 | 720 | 106 | 0.0049% | * | * | * |
| 1957 | 755 | 99 | 0.0045% | * | * | * |
| 1956 | 798 | 87 | 0.0041% | * | * | * |
| 1955 | 704 | 108 | 0.0052% | * | * | * |
| 1954 | 723 | 100 | 0.0048% | * | * | * |
| 1953 | 713 | 100 | 0.0050% | * | * | * |
| 1952 | 668 | 108 | 0.0055% | * | * | * |
| 1951 | 697 | 101 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
| 1950 | 700 | 96 | 0.0053% | * | * | * |
| 1949 | 639 | 114 | 0.0063% | * | * | * |
| 1948 | 606 | 125 | 0.0070% | * | * | * |
| 1947 | 648 | 114 | 0.0062% | * | * | * |
| 1946 | 599 | 115 | 0.0070% | * | * | * |
| 1945 | 659 | 84 | 0.0061% | * | * | * |
| 1944 | 553 | 120 | 0.0087% | * | * | * |
| 1943 | 618 | 104 | 0.0072% | * | * | * |
| 1942 | 640 | 99 | 0.0070% | * | * | * |
| 1941 | 605 | 98 | 0.0078% | * | * | * |
| 1940 | 669 | 82 | 0.0069% | * | * | * |
| 1939 | 567 | 102 | 0.0090% | * | * | * |
| 1938 | 613 | 94 | 0.0083% | * | * | * |
| 1937 | 640 | 85 | 0.0078% | * | * | * |
| 1936 | 579 | 99 | 0.0093% | * | * | * |
| 1935 | 630 | 87 | 0.0081% | * | * | * |
| 1934 | 686 | 79 | 0.0074% | * | * | * |
| 1933 | 589 | 97 | 0.0095% | * | * | * |
| 1932 | 577 | 105 | 0.0098% | * | * | * |
| 1931 | 563 | 109 | 0.0102% | * | * | * |
| 1930 | 599 | 103 | 0.0091% | * | * | * |
| 1929 | 529 | 122 | 0.0110% | * | * | * |
| 1928 | 557 | 120 | 0.0105% | * | * | * |
| 1927 | 582 | 113 | 0.0097% | * | * | * |
| 1926 | 537 | 128 | 0.0112% | * | * | * |
| 1925 | 535 | 131 | 0.0114% | * | * | * |
| 1924 | 541 | 137 | 0.0117% | * | * | * |
| 1923 | 517 | 139 | 0.0123% | * | * | * |
| 1922 | 532 | 138 | 0.0123% | * | * | * |
| 1921 | 585 | 118 | 0.0104% | * | * | * |
| 1920 | 563 | 122 | 0.0111% | * | * | * |
| 1919 | 498 | 143 | 0.0141% | * | * | * |
| 1918 | 526 | 132 | 0.0126% | * | * | * |
| 1917 | 608 | 96 | 0.0100% | * | * | * |
| 1916 | 657 | 81 | 0.0088% | * | * | * |
| 1915 | 578 | 97 | 0.0110% | * | * | * |
| 1914 | 482 | 102 | 0.0149% | * | * | * |
| 1913 | 588 | 56 | 0.0105% | * | * | * |
| 1912 | 441 | 79 | 0.0175% | * | * | * |
| 1911 | 397 | 52 | 0.0216% | * | * | * |
| 1910 | 329 | 56 | 0.0269% | * | * | * |
| 1909 | 335 | 48 | 0.0272% | * | * | * |
| 1908 | 371 | 39 | 0.0235% | * | * | * |
| 1907 | 354 | 39 | 0.0246% | * | * | * |
| 1906 | 403 | 29 | 0.0201% | * | * | * |
| 1905 | 349 | 35 | 0.0244% | * | * | * |
| 1904 | 397 | 28 | 0.0202% | * | * | * |
| 1903 | 348 | 31 | 0.0240% | * | * | * |
| 1902 | 375 | 28 | 0.0211% | * | * | * |
| 1901 | 445 | 19 | 0.0164% | * | * | * |
| 1900 | 323 | 44 | 0.0271% | * | * | * |
| 1899 | 408 | 21 | 0.0182% | * | * | * |
| 1898 | 361 | 29 | 0.0219% | * | * | * |
| 1897 | 363 | 27 | 0.0221% | * | * | * |
| 1896 | 345 | 31 | 0.0240% | * | * | * |
| 1895 | 305 | 35 | 0.0276% | * | * | * |
| 1894 | 268 | 43 | 0.0344% | * | * | * |
| 1893 | 313 | 31 | 0.0256% | * | * | * |
| 1892 | 307 | 37 | 0.0281% | * | * | * |
| 1891 | 329 | 27 | 0.0247% | * | * | * |
| 1890 | 306 | 32 | 0.0267% | * | * | * |
| 1889 | 475 | 16 | 0.0134% | * | * | * |
| 1888 | 305 | 35 | 0.0269% | * | * | * |
| 1887 | 295 | 32 | 0.0293% | * | * | * |
| 1886 | 374 | 22 | 0.0185% | * | * | * |
| 1885 | 335 | 26 | 0.0224% | * | * | * |
| 1884 | 365 | 24 | 0.0196% | * | * | * |
| 1883 | 343 | 24 | 0.0213% | * | * | * |
| 1882 | 325 | 28 | 0.0229% | * | * | * |
| 1881 | 338 | 24 | 0.0222% | * | * | * |
| 1880 | 385 | 20 | 0.0169% | * | * | * |
| * No data shown indicates the name was not among the top 1000 most popular names for that year. | ||||||
